Advertisement

The study on the drop detachment for automatic pipeline GMAW system: free flight mode

  • Alireza Doodman TipiEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

In the automatic pipeline welding systems, the mechanical properties and weld bead geometry are changed following to angle variation around the pipe. It occurred since during a weld pass, there are all of possible positions. In this work, first an augmented state-space model of process is presented that includes the travel motion and angle of robot. Also, gravitational force and arc voltage equations are modified. This model covers the free flight transfer modes (spray and globular). Then, accuracy of model is shown by model validation and comparing to real experiments. Finally, the angle effect on detachment is studied for all positions using simulation results. Detachment frequency variations, disturbance effects, and irregularity in detachments are analyzed using time–frequency representation.

Keywords

Gas metal arc welding Dynamic behavior Characteristic equations Modeling Time–frequency representation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benyounis KY, Olabi AG (2008) Optimization of different welding processes using statistical and numerical approaches: a reference guide. Adv Eng Soft 39:483–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim IS, Son JS, Kim IG, Kim JY, Kim OS (2003) A study on relationship between process variable and bead penetration for robotic CO2 arc welding. J Mater Process Technol 136:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raveendra J, Parmar RS (1987) Mathematical models to predict weld bead geometry for flux cored arc welding. Met Construct 19:31–35Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Manonmani K, Murugan N, Buvanasekaran G (2005) Effect of process parameters on the weld bead geometry of laser beam butt welded stainless steel sheets. Int J Adv Manu Technol 17:103–109Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kannan T, Murugan N (2006) Effect of flux cored arc welding process parameters on duplex stainless steel clad quality. J mater Process Technol 176:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ridings GE, Thomson RC, Thewlis G (2002) Prediction of multi wire submerged arc weld bead shape using neural network modeling. Sci Technol Weld Join 7:265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee HK, Han HS, Son KJ, Hong SB (2006) Optimization of Nd-YAG laser welding parameters for sealing small titanium tube ends. Mater Sci Eng A 415:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canyurt OE (2005) Estimation of welded joint strength using genetic algorithm approach. Int J Mech Sci 47:1249–1261zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomsen JS (2004) Advanced control methods for optimization of arc welding. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Cont. Eng., Aalborg University, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ushio M, Mao W (1996) Modeling of the arc sensor for DC MIG/MAG welding in open arc mode—a study on the improvement of the sensitivity and the reliability of the arc sensor in GMA welding (1st report). J Jpn Weld Soc 14:99–107Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JW, Na SJ (1991) A study on prediction of welding current in GMAW. Proc Ins Mech Eng Part B 205:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Richardson IM, Bucknall PW, Stares I (1994) The influence of power source dynamics on wire melting rate in pulsed GMAW. Weld J 73:32–37Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi SK, Yoo CD, Kim YS (1998) Dynamic simulation of metal transfer in GMAW—part 1: globular and spray transfer modes. Weld J 77:38–44Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kenedy JL (1993) Oil and gas pipeline fundamentals, 2nd edn. Penn Pub, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lopes GT (2006) Arc-based sensing in narrow groove pipe welding, Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield Univ, Sch Indus Manu SciGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Modenesi PJ, Reis RI (2007) A model for melting rate phenomena in GMA welding. J Mater Process Technol 189:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simpson SW, Zhu P (1995) Formation of molten droplets at a consumable anode in an electric welding arc. J Phys D: Appl Phys 28:1594–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johnson JA, Smartt HB, Harmer T, Moore KL, Reutzel EW, Einerson CJ (1995) Derivation and calibration of a gas metal arc welding (GMAW) dynamic droplet model. In: Trends in welding research. Proc 4th Int Conf, pp 377–384Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jones LA, Eagar TW, Lang JH (1998) Magnetic forces acting on molten drops in gas metal arc welding. J Phys D: Appl Phys 31:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Watkins AD, Smartt HB, Johnson J (1992) A dynamic model of droplet growth and detachment in GMAW. Proc Int Trends Weld Sci Technol, ASMGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Doodman Tipi AR, Mortazavi SA (2008) A new adaptive method (AF-PID) presentation with implementation in the automatic welding robot. IEEE/ASME Int Conf Mechat Embed Sys Appl (MESA08), Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kermanshah University of TechnologyKermanshahIran

Personalised recommendations