Solution of inverse dynamics problems for contour error minimization in CNC machines

Open Access
Original Article

Abstract

For CNC machines governed by typical feedback controllers, the problem of compensating for inertia and damping of the machine axes is solved by a priori modifications to the commanded path geometry. Standard second-order models of axis dynamics are expressed in terms of the path parameter ξ rather than the time t as independent variable, incurring ordinary differential equations with polynomial coefficients. For a commanded path specified as a Pythagorean-hodograph curve R(ξ) and a P controller, a modified path \(\hat{\bf R}(\xi)\) can be determined as a rational Bézier curve, that precisely compensates for the axis inertia and damping, and thus (theoretically) achieves zero contour error. For PI, PID, or P–PI controllers, exact closed-form solutions for \(\hat{\bf R}(\xi)\) are no longer possible, but polynomial approximations may be computed in the numerically stable Bernstein basis on ξ ∈ [ 0,1 ]. The inverse-dynamics path modification procedure is applicable to both constant feedrates and variable feedrates defined by polynomial functions V(ξ) of the curve parameter. The method is described in the general context of PID controllers, and its implementation is then demonstrated for both P and PI controllers, governing motion along paths with extreme variations of curvature and/or parametric speed.

Keywords

CNC machine PID controller Inverse dynamics Feedrate Contour error Path modification Pythagorean-hodograph curve 

References

  1. 1.
    Altintas Y (2000) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coddington EA (1961) An introduction to ordinary differential equations. Dover, New York (reprint)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis PJ (1975) Interpolation and approximation. Dover, New York (reprint)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Souza AF, Coelho RT (2007) Experimental investigation of feed rate limitations on high speed milling aimed at industrial applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1104–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erkorkmaz K, Yeung C-H, Altintas Y (2006) Virtual CNC system. Part II. High speed contouring application. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1124–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farouki RT (1994) The conformal map zz 2 of the hodograph plane. Comput Aided Geom Des 11:363–390MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farouki RT (2008) Pythagorean-hodograph curves: algebra and geometry inseparable. Springer, BerlinMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farouki RT, Goodman TNT (1996) On the optimal stability of the Bernstein basis. Math Comput 65:1553–1566MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farouki RT, Neff CA (1995) Hermite interpolation by Pythagorean-hodograph quintics. Math Comput 64:1589–1609MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farouki RT, Rajan VT (1987) On the numerical condition of polynomials in Bernstein form. Comput Aided Geom Des 4:191–216MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farouki RT, Rajan VT (1988) Algorithms for polynomials in Bernstein form. Comput Aided Geom Des 5:1–26MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farouki RT, Sakkalis T (1991) Real rational curves are not “unit speed.” Comput Aided Geom Des 8:151–157MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farouki RT, Sakkalis T (2007) Rational space curves are not “unit speed.” Comput Aided Geom Des 24:238–240MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farouki RT, Shah S (1996) Real-time CNC interpolators for Pythagorean-hodograph curves. Comput Aided Geom Des 13:583–600MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Farouki RT, Tsai Y-F (2001) Exact Taylor series coefficients for variable-feedrate CNC curve interpolators. Comput Aided Des 33:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hausdorff F (1957) Set theory (translated by J. R. Aumann et al.). Chelsea, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Imani BM, Jahanpour J (2008) High-speed contouring enhanced with PH curves. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:747–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jahanpour J, Imani BM (2008) Real-time PH curve CNC interpolators for high speed cornering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:302–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Komanduri R, Subramanian K, von Turkovich BF (eds) (1984) High speed machining. PED, vol 12. ASME, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shpitalni M, Koren Y, Lo CC (1994) Realtime curve interpolators. Comput Aided Des 26:832–838MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith S, Tlusty J (1997) Current trends in high-speed machining. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 119:664–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tlusty J (1993) High-speed machining. CIRP Ann 42:733–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsai Y-F, Farouki RT (2001) Algorithm 812: BPOLY: an object-oriented library of numerical algorithms for polynomials in Bernstein form. ACM Trans Math Softw 27:267–296MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang DCH, Kong T (1994) Parametric interpolator versus linear interpolator for precision CNC machining. Comput Aided Des 26:225–234MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yeh S-S, Hsu P-L (1999) The speed-controlled interpolator for machining parametric curves. Comput Aided Des 31:349–357MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yeung, C-H, Altintas Y, Erkorkmaz K (2006) Virtual CNC system. Part I. System architecture. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1107–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations