Abstract
There is widespread consensus that landfill of waste electronic and electric equipment is not an acceptable end-of-use management option. Diversion from landfill, either through voluntary or mandatory take-back and collection programs, overwhelmingly leads to the recycling of e-waste, which typically consists of the recovery of a limited number of metals. Cell phones are currently one of the few electronic products, if not the only one, that also have a thriving reuse market. In fact, more handsets are reused than recycled. Cell phones therefore offer the rare opportunity to compare closed-loop supply chains for e-waste reuse and recycling. In this paper, we examine the economics of cell phone reuse and recycling based on detailed primary data collected from reverse logistics, reuse and recycling operations in 2003 in the UK and in 2006 in the US. We show that while cell phone reuse has a healthy profit margin, handset recycling is currently a by-product of reuse.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Nokia (2005a) Integrated product policy pilot project stage 1 report. Nokia, Espoo, Finland, January 2005
Mawston N (2008) Motorola, Sony Ericsson and Apple Lose Global Handset Marketshare in Q1 2008, Research Report, 25 April 2008, Strategy Analytics, Newton, MA
WEEE (2002) EU directive 2002/96/EC (WEEE directive). J Eur Union L37:24–38
CPRA (2004) Cell Phone Recycling Act (CPRA) of 2004, Assembly Bill 2901, State of California
Geyer R (2004) Environmental and economic evaluation of supply loops and their constraints, PhD Dissertation, Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, UK
Doctori Blass V, Favret L, Fuji M, Mahdavi S, Miller R, Neira J (2006) End-of-life management of cell phones in the United States, Master’s Thesis, Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Clift R (1997) The ECTEL trials. J Ind Ecol 1(2):3–5
Wright L (1999) Product life cycle management, EngD Thesis, Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
McLaren J, Wright L, Parkinson S, Jackson T (1999) A dynamic life-cycle energy model of mobile phone take-back and recycling. J Ind Ecol 2(1):77–91
Clift R, Wright L (2000) Relationship between environmental impacts and added value along the supply chain. Technol Forecast Soc Change 65:281–295
Stutz M, Franz R, Tzscheutschler P (2000) Energy use in the life cycle of a cellular phone: a study of the impacts during manufacturing and use. Proceedings of EGG 2000, 11–13 Sept 2000, Berlin, Germany
Oiva L, Oppermann W, Middendorf A, Zuber K-H, Stobbe I (2000) Case study on the environmental impacts of a mobile phone. Proceedings of EGG 2000, 11–13 Sept 2000, Berlin, Germany
Lindholm ME (2003) Toward environmentally conscious product design—a comprehensive DfE implementation in new generation cellular phones. Proceeding of the ISEE 2003, 19–22 May 2003, Boston, MA, USA
Takala R, Tanskanen P (2002) Outlining opportunities of engineering process and technology on environmental impacts of the end of life treatment of mobile terminals. Proceedings of IMAPS Nordic Annual Conference, September 2002, Stockholm, Sweden
Guide VDR (2000) Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. J Oper Manag 18:467–483
Guide VDR, Van Wassenhove LN (2002) Closed-loop supply chains. In: Ayres RU, Ayres LW (eds) A handbook of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Guide VDR, Van Wassenhove LN (eds) (2003) Business aspects of closed-loop supply chains. Carnegie Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh
Basdere B, Seliger G (2003) Disassembly factories for electrical and electronic products to recover resources in product and material cycles. Environ Sci Technol 37(23):5354–5362
Seliger G, Skerlos SJ, Basdere B, Zettle M (2003) Design of a modular housing platform to accommodate remanufacturing of multiple cellular phone models. Proceedings of EcoDesign 2003, Tokyo, Japan, 8–11 Dec 2003
Guide VDR, Teunter RH, Van Wassenhove LN (2003) Matching demand and supply to maximize profits from remanufacturing. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 5(4):303–316
Skerlos SJ, Seliger G, Morrow WR, Chan K-Y, Basdere B, Zhao F, Hula A, Prasitnarit A (2003) Economic and environmental characteristics of global cellular telephone remanufacturing. Proceeding of the ISEE 2003, 19–22 May 2003, Boston, MA
Bhuie AK, Ogunseitan OA, Saphores J-DM Shapiro AA (2004) Environmental and economic trade-offs in consumer electronic products recycling: a case study of cell phones and computers. Proceeding of the ISEE 2004, 19–23 May 2004, Phoenix, AZ
McLaren J, Piukkula N (2004) Life cycle assessment of a 3 rd generation Nokia handset. Proceedings of EGG 2004, 6–9 Sept 2004, Berlin, Germany
Malmodin J (2004) Summary of the study “life cycle assessment of a third generation (3G) system at Ericcson”. Ericcson Radio Systems, Stockholm
Pesonen I (2002) Development of eco-efficiency of base stations by means of the MIPS indicator. Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki
Frey SD, Harrison DJ, Billet EH (2006) Ecological footprint analysis applied to mobile phones. J Ind Ecol 10(1–2):199–216
Huisman J (2004) QWERTY and eco-efficiency analysis on cellular phone treatment in Sweden, TU Delft, The Netherlands, commissioned by El-Kretsen, Stockholm, Sweden
Scharnhorst W, Althaus H-J, Classen M, Jolliete O, Hilty LM (2005) The end of life treatment of second generation mobile phone networks: strategies to reduce the environmental impacts. Environ Impact Asses Rev 25:540–566
HML (2004) E-waste report: determination of regulated elements in seven types of discarded consumer electronic products, Hazardous Material Laboratory (HML), Cal EPA
Townsend TG, Vann K, Mutha S, Pearson B, Jang Y-C, Musson S, Jordan A (2004) RCRA toxicity characterization of computer CPUs and other discarded electronic devices, Report to US EPA, University of Florida, FL
Lincoln JD, Ogunseitan OA, Shapiro AA, Saphores J-DM (2007) Leaching assessments of hazardous materials in cellular phones. Environ Sci Technol 41(7):2572–2578
Uryu T, Yoshinaga J, Yanagisawa Y (2003) Environmental fate of gallium arsenide semiconductor disposal. J Ind Ecol 7(2):103–112
Nokia (2005b) Integrated product policy pilot project stage 2 final report: options for improving life-cycle environmental performance of mobile phones, Nokia, Espoo, Finland, September 2005
Nokia (2006) Integrated product policy pilot project: stage 3 report: evaluation of options for improving life-cycle environmental performance of mobile phones, Nokia, Finland, April 2006
MPPI (2005) Environmentally sound management of end-of-life mobile phones. Mobile Phone Partnership Initiative. Basel Convention, UNEP, Geneva
ITU (2007) World telecommunication/ICT indicators database, 11th edn. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva
Yuan L (2007) Upgrading a call on emerging markets. Wall Street J, 6 September 2007
DEFRA (2003) A study on mobile phones and the potential for recycling other small electrical and electronic products. Request for tender. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
Saphores J-DM, Nixon H, Ogunseitan OA, Shapiro AA (2006) Household willingness to recycle electronic waste: an application to California. Environ Behav 38(2):183–208
Mayers K, France C, Cleverly A, Kabouris E, Planas S (2002) The use and disposal of IT products within commercial markets. J Bus Ind Mark 17(5):357–376
Coopers T, Mayers K (2000) Prospects for household appliances. E-SCOPE, London
SSMR (2001) Mobile phone user survey. Surrey Social and Market Research Ltd. (SSMR), Guildford
Mayers K (2001) An investigation of the implications and effectiveness of producer responsibility for the disposal of WEEE. EngD Thesis, Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Sullivan DE (2006) Recycled cell phones—a treasure trove of valuable metals. United States Geological Survey (USGS), Denver
EPA (2008) Fact sheet: recycle your cell phone—it’s an easy call, EPA530-F-07-046, January 2008, US EPA
MPPI (2006) Guideline on material recovery and recycling of end-of-life mobile phones. Mobile Phone Partnership Initiative. Basel Convention, UNEP, Geneva
Scharnhorst (2006) Life cycle assessment of mobile phone networks, with focus on the end-of-life phase, PhD Thesis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
Teh C-H (2006) Personal communication with Chuan-Hai Teh. Noranda Recycling, San Jose
ECS (2006) Personal communication with Thomas Hogye, Ken Taggert and Steve Ryan. ECS Refining, Santa Clara
Shields (2002) Fonebak information package. Shields Environmental plc, South Ockendon
Stutz M, Burkhard C, Ertel J (2002) Cost elements of recycling and the design of mobile phones in the context of WEEE. Proceedings of Going Green CARE Innovation, 25–28 Nov 2002, Vienna, Austria
Hainault T, Smith DS, Cauchi DJ, Thompson TA, Fisher MM, Hetzel C (2000) Minnesota’s multi-stakeholder approach to managing electronic products at end-of-life. Proceedings of ISEE 2000, 8–10 May 2000, San Francisco, CA
Else (2003) Internal documents. Else Refining & Recycling Ltd., Shefford
USGS (2007) Minerals yearbook, 2007. United States Geological Survey (USGS), Denver
Kirkman GA (2003) Personal communication with Grant A Kirkman. Greener Solutions, London
Blackburn JD, Guide VDR, Souza GC, Van Wassenhove LN (2004) Reverse supply chain for commercial returns. Calif Manage Rev 46(2):6–22
Guide VDR, Muyldermans L, Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Hewlett-Packard Company unlocks the value potential for time-sensitive returns. Interfaces 35(4):281–293
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Geyer, R., Doctori Blass, V. The economics of cell phone reuse and recycling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47, 515–525 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2228-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2228-z