Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis and modeling of effective parameters for dimension shrinkage variation of injection molded part with thin shell feature using response surface methodology

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The injection molded housing part with thin shell feature could be produced to increase the internal space for packing more components. In this study, injection velocity, packing pressure, mold temperature, and melt temperature were selected as effective parameters for injection molding process. For the purpose of reducing dimension shrinkage variation of thin shell molded part, the response surface methodology was utilized to determine the relationship between input parameters and responses. Then the optimization condition was obtained according to the desirability function. Results show that melt temperature is the most significant factor on dimension shrinkage variation in transverse direction, followed by packing pressure, mold temperature, and injection velocity. However, in the longitudinal direction, packing pressure has the greatest influence on the dimension shrinkage variation, followed by injection velocity, melt temperature, and mold temperature. In accordance with verification experiments, the difference between the experimental data and predicted values ranges from −9.8% to 1.8%. To obtain the optimal condition, the overall desirability must be larger than 0.9. Based on analysis of variance, the proposed models look reasonably accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozcelik B, Erzurumlu T (2005) Determination of effecting dimensional parameters on warpage of thin shell plastic part using integrated response surface method and genetic algorithm. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 32:1085–1094. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2004.10.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Galantucci LM, Spina R (2003) Evaluation of filling conditions of injection moulding by integrating numerical simulations and experimental tests. J Mater Process Technol 142:266–275. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(03) 00276-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen C, Wang L, Li Q (2007) Optimization of injection molding process parameters using combination of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm method. J Mater Process Technol 183:412–418. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen YK, Wu CW, Yu YF, Chung HW (2008) Analysis for optimal gate design of thin-walled injection molding. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 35:728–734. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2008.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen YK, Yeh PH, Wu JS (2001) Numerical simulation for thin wall injection molding of fiber-reinforced thermoplastics. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 28:1035–1042. doi:10.1016/S0735-1933(01) 00307-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang MC, Tai CC (2001) The effective factors in the warpage problem of an injection-molded part with a thin shell feature. J Mater Process Technol 110:1–9. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(00) 00649-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang SH, Tan YJ, Sapuan SM, Sulaiman S, Ismail N, Samin R (2007) The use of Taguchi method in the design of plastic injection mould for reducing warpage. J Mater Process Technol 182:418–426. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.08.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park K, Ahn JH (2004) Design of experiment considering two-way interactions and its application to injection molding processes with numerical analysis. J Mater Process Technol 146:221–227. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi DS, Im YT (1999) Prediction of shrinkage and warpage in consideration of residual stress in integrated simulation of injection molding. Compos Struct 47:655–665. doi:10.1016/S0263-8223(00) 00045-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Myers RH, Montgomery DH (1995) Response surface methodology. Wiley, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chiang KT (2007) Modeling and optimization of designing parameters for a parallel-plain fin heat sink with confined impinging jet using the response surface methodology. Appl Therm Eng 27:2473–2482. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurtaran H, Erzurumlu T (2006) Efficient warpage optimization of thin shell plastic parts using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:468–472. doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2321-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moldflow Plastics Insight Release 5.0 (2004)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Cherng Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, CC., Su, PL. & Lin, YC. Analysis and modeling of effective parameters for dimension shrinkage variation of injection molded part with thin shell feature using response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45, 1087 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2045-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2045-4

Keywords

Navigation