Skip to main content
Log in

Use of a procedural model in the design of production control for a polymerization plant

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process manufacturing has a number of characteristics that make it different from other types of manufacturing. These characteristics are reflected in the design of process production control. This article addresses some features of process manufacturing that have to be taken into account during the design of a production control system in the process industries and gives an example of the design of a process production control system based on production performance indicators. The description of a model of a case study polymerization production plant is presented. Based on this model, a control structure framework is proposed, which makes it possible to automate part of the manager’s work. In this study, the model-based controller is introduced to the control structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Gorry GA, Scott Morton MS (1971) Framework for management information systems. Sloan Manage Rev 13(1):55–70

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simon HA (1977) The new science of management decision. Prentice Hall, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anthony R (1965) Planning and control systems: a framework for analysis. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston

  4. Shim JP, Warkentin M, Courtney JF, Power DJ, Sharda R, Carlsson C (2002) Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decis Support Syst 33(2):111–126 doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00139-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K (1995) Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Oper Prod Manage 15(4):80–116 doi:10.1108/01443579510083622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Folan P, Brown J (2005) A review of performance measurement: towards performance management. Comput Ind 56:663–680 doi:10.1016/j.compind.2005.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghalayini AM, Noble JS, Crowe TJ (1997) An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness. Int J Prod Econ 48:207–225 doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(96)00093-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suwignjo P, Bititci US, Carrie AS (2000) Quantitative models for performance measurement system. Int J Prod Econ 64(1–3):231–241 doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00061-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mouss NN, Mouss HL, Baci A, Koull A (2003) Evaluation of industrial performance for the reactif piloting of production. Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA ‘03 IEEE Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, vol 1, pp 580–587

  10. Vernadat FB (1996) Enterprise modeling and integration. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mönch L (2007) Simulation-based benchmarking of production control schemes for complex manufacturing systems. Control Eng Pract 15:1381–1393 doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrer-Nadal S, Yélamos-Ruiz I, Graells M, Puigjaner L (2007) An integrated framework for on-line supervised optimization. Comput Chem Eng 31:401–409 doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Skogestad S (2004) Near-optimal operation by self-optimizing control: from process control to marathon running and business systems. Comput Chem Eng 29:127–137 doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aske EMB, Strand S, Skogestad S (2007) Coordinator MPC for maximizing plant throughput. Comput Chem Eng 32:195–204 doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dilworth JB (1996) Operations management. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scherer E (1995) Approaches to complexity and uncertainty of scheduling in process industries: process regulation in highly auto-mated systems. IFAC Symposium on Automated Systems Based on Human Skills, Berlin, Germany, pp 91–95

  17. Hauptman B, Jovan V (2004) An approach to process production reactive scheduling. ISA Trans 43:305–318 doi:10.1016/S0019-0578(07)60039-1

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kariwala V (2007) Optimal measurement combination for local self-optimizing control. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:3629–3634 doi:10.1021/ie0610187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gradišar D, Mušič G (2007) Production-process modelling based on production-management data: a Petri-net approach. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 20(8):794–810 doi:10.1080/09511920601103064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morari M, Lee JH (1999) Model predictive control: past, present and future. Comput Chem Eng 23(4–5):667–682 doi:10.1016/S0098-1354(98)00301-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qin SJ, Badgwell TA (2003) A survey of industrial model predictive control technology. Control Eng Pract 11(7):733–764 doi:10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00186-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maciejowski JM (1989) Multivariable feedback design. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Škrjanc I, Blažič S, Oblak S, Richalet J (2004) An approach to predictive control of multivariable time-delayed plant: stability and design issues. ISA Trans 43:585–595 doi:10.1016/S0019-0578(07)60170-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bemporad A, Morari M, Ricker L (2006) Model predictive control toolbox for use with MATLAB. The Mathworks, Natwick

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dejan Gradišar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zorzut, S., Gradišar, D., Jovan, V. et al. Use of a procedural model in the design of production control for a polymerization plant. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44, 1051–1062 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1915-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1915-5

Keywords

Navigation