Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical modeling of tool wear rate in ultrasonic machining of titanium

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasonic machining is a mechanical material removal process used to erode holes and cavities in hard or brittle workpiece by using shaped tools, high-frequency mechanical motion, and an abrasive slurry. In the present study, outcome of the Taguchi model has been used for developing a mathematical model for tool wear rate; using Buckingham’s π-theorem for stationary ultrasonic machining of titanium and its alloys. Six input parameters, namely, tool material, power rating, slurry type, slurry temperature, slurry concentration, and slurry grit size were selected to give output in form of tool wear rate. This study will provide main effects of these variables on tool wear rate and will shed light on the tool wear mechanism in ultrasonic machining of titanium and its alloys. The comparison with experimental results will also serve as further validation of model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rupinder S, Khamba JS (2004) Machining characteristics comparison of titanium alloys in ultrasonic assisted drilling. In: Proceedings of International Conference on recent advances in composite materials, India, pp. 438–443

  2. Rupinder S, Khamba JS (2007) Macro-model for ultrasonic machining of titanium and its alloys(:) designed experiments. J Eng Manuf B2:221–229

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rupinder S, Khamba JS (2003) A framework for modeling the machining characteristics of titanium alloys using USM. In: Proceedings of Int. Conf. Digital aided modeling and simulation, India, pp. 31

  4. Rupinder S, Khamba JS (2003) Silicon carbide slurry effect in ultrasonic assisted drilling of titanium alloy. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Today 2(7):8–11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khamba JS, Rupinder S (2003) Effect of alumina (white fused) slurry in ultrasonic assisted drilling of titanium alloys (TITAN 15). In: Proceedings of National Conference on Materials and Related Technologies (NCMRT), India, pp. 75–79

  6. Rupinder S, Khamba JS (2004) Study of machining characteristics of titanium alloys in ultrasonic machining. In: Proceedings of the 21st AIMTDR conference, India, pp. 155–160

  7. Rupinder S, Khamba JS (2004) Comparison of machining characteristics of titanium alloys: effect of slurry in ultrasonic machining process. In: Proceedings of global congress on manufacturing and management (GCMM), India, pp. 54–58

  8. Benedict GF (1987) Book on non traditional manufacturing processes. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 67–86

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thoe TB, Aspinwall DK, Wise MLH (1998) Review on ultrasonic machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38(4):239–255. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(97)00036-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scab KHW (1990) Parametric studies of ultrasonic machining, SME Tech. paper, pp. 11.

  11. Neppiras EA (1972) Macrosonics in industry. Ultrasonics 10:9–13. doi:10.1016/0041-624X(72)90207-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Perkins J (1972) An outline of power ultrasonics. In: Technical Report by Kerry Ultrasonics, pp. 7

  13. Farago FT (1980) Abrasive methods engineering. Vol. 2, Industrial, pp. 480–481

  14. Balamuth L (1964) Ultrasonic vibrations assist cutting tools. Metalwork Prod 108:75–77

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nishimura G (1954) Ultrasonic machining—part I. J Fac Eng 24(3):65–100

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy DC, Grieve RJ (1975) Ultrasonic machining—a review. The Prod Engineer 54(9):481–486

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kremer D (1991) New developments on ultrasonic machining, SME Technical Paper, MR91-522, pp. 13

  18. Clifton D, Imal Y, McGeough JA (1993) Some ultrasonic effects on machining materials encountered in the offshore industries. In: Proceedings of 30th Int. MATADOR Conf., pp. 119–123

  19. Shaw MC (1956) Ultrasonic grinding. Microtechnic 10(6):257–265

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moreland MA (1991) Ultrasonic machining—Book chapter: ceramics and glasses, ASM International, Engineering Material Handbook, ISBN 0871702827, Schneider and Samuel J., Vol.4, pp. 359–362

  21. Garde RJ, Mirajgaoker AG (1988) Book on engineering fluid mechanics, Chapter-7 on Dimensional analysis and similitude. Chand, Roorkee, India, pp 235–236

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bansal RK (1998) A text book of fluid mechanics and hydraulic machines, Chapter-12, Dimensional and model analysis. Laxmi, New Delhi, pp 595–600

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar DS (1987) Fluid mechanics and fluid power engineering, chapter-6, dimensional analysis and model similitude. Kataria, India, pp 323–326

    Google Scholar 

  24. Modi PN, Seth SM (1998) Hydraulics and fluid mechanics, chapter-17, dimensional analysis. Standard, New Delhi, pp 830–833

    Google Scholar 

  25. Streeter VL, Benjamin WE (1983) Book on fluid mechanics, international student edition. McGraw-Hill, Japan, pp 160–169

    Google Scholar 

  26. Buckingham E (1915) Model experiments and the form of empirical equations. Trans. ASME 37:263–296

    Google Scholar 

  27. Amitabha G, Mallik AK (1996) Book on manufacturing science, chapter 6. East–West, India, pp 335–353:409–411

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rupinder Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, R., Khamba, J.S. Mathematical modeling of tool wear rate in ultrasonic machining of titanium. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43, 573–580 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1729-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1729-5

Keywords

Navigation