Skip to main content
Log in

Economical operation of the C pm control chart for monitoring process capability index

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process capability indices are widely used to provide the evaluation measure of a process. Especially, the process capability index C pm , which is defined by the range of the process standard specification limits and the deviation from a target value, is called the Taguchi index. Boyles has investigated the statistical characteristics of the estimator \(\hat{C}_{pm}\), and also proposed a technique for the C pm control chart. Since the process capability index C pm is based on the concept of the Taguchi’s quality loss, the process capability index C pm already includes an economical concept. In this article, we evaluate an operating cost consisting of the sampling cost, the sample cost, and the quality loss of failing to detect an out-of-control state when the C pm control chart is used. Then, we derive an optimal operating plan by sample size and sampling interval in order to minimize the ceiling value of the operating cost based on the min–max criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbasi B (2008) A neural network applied to estimate process capability of non-normal processes. Expert Syst Appl (in press)

  2. Ames AE, Mattucci N, MacDonald S, Szonyi G, Hawkins DM (1997) Quality loss function for optimization across multiple response surfaces. J Qual Technol 29(3):339–346

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arizono I, Kanagawa A, Ohta H, Watakabe K, Tateishi K (1997) Variable sampling plans for normal distribution indexed by Taguchi’s loss function. Nav Res Logist 44(6):591–603

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bai DS, Lee KT (1998) An economic design of variables sampling interval \(\overline{X}\) control charts. Int J Prod Econ 54(1):57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Banerjee PK, Rahim MA (1988) Economic design of \(\overline{X}\)–control charts under weibull shock models. Technometrics 30(4):407–414

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ben-Daya M, Duffuaa SO (2003) Integration of Taguchi’s loss function approach in the economic design of \(\overline{x}\) chart. Int J Qual Reliab Manage 20(5):607–619D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyles RS (1991) The Taguchi capability index. J Qual Technol 23(1):17–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Collani EV, Saniga EM, Weigand C (1994) Economic adjustment designs for \(\overline{X}\) control chart. IIE Trans 26(6):37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duncan AJ (1956) The economic design of \(\overline{x}\)–charts used to maintain current control of a process. J Am Stat Assoc 51:228–242

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Duncan AJ (1971) The economic design of \(\overline{x}\)–charts when there is a multiplicity of assignable causes. J Am Stat Assoc 66:107–121

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Festervand TA, Kethley RB, Waller BD (2001) The marketing of industrial real estate: application of Taguchi loss functions. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 10(4):219–228

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Gong L, Jwo W, Tang K (1997) Using on-line sensors in statistical process control. Manag Sci 43(7):1017–1028

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hosseinifard SZ, Abbasi B, Ahmad S, Abdollahian M (2008) A transformation technique to estimate the process capability index for non-normal processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (in press)

  14. Hsieh KL, Tong LI (2006) Incorporating process capability index and quality loss function into analyzing the process capability for qualitative data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27(11–12):1217–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiao JR, Helo PT (2008) Optimization design of a CUSUM control chart based on Taguchi’s loss function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35(11–12):1234–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones LA, Champ CW, Rigdon SE (2001) The performance of exponentially weighted moving average charts with estimated parameters. Technometrics 43(2):156–167

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1994) Continuous univariate distributions. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18(1):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kobayashi J, Arizono I, Takemoto Y (2003) Economical operation of the \( (\overline{x}, s)\) control chart indexed by Taguchi’s loss function. Int J Prod Res 41(6):1115–1132

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kotz C, Johnson NL (1993) Process capability indices. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kotz C, Lovelance CR (1998) Process capability indices in theory and practice. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lorenzen TJ, Vance LC (1986) The economic design of control charts: a unified approach. Technometrics 28(1):3–10

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Maghsoodloo S, Li MC (2000) Optimal asymmetric tolerance design. IIE Trans 32(12):1127–1137D

    Google Scholar 

  24. Montgomery DC (2001) Introduction to statistical quality control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morita M, Arizono I, Takemoto Y (2008) Variable sampling inspection plans with screening for assuring average outgoing surplus quality loss limit indexed by Taguchi’s loss. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (in press)

  26. Parkhideh B, Case KE (1989) The economic design of a dynamic \(\overline{X}\)—control chart. IIE Trans 21(4):313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Patnaik PB (1949) The non-central χ 2- and F-distribution and their applications. Biometrika 36:202–232

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Pearn WL, Shu MH (2003) Lower confidence bounds with sample size information for C pm applied to production yield assurance. Int J Prod Res 41(15):3581–3599

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Serfling RJ (1980) Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Taguchi G (1985) A tutorial on quality control and assurance—the Taguchi methods. In: ASA Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, 24–27 October 1985

  31. Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  32. Takemoto Y, Watakabe K, Arizono I (2003) A study of cumulative sum \( (\,\overline{x}, s)\) control chart. Int J Prod Res 41(9):1873–1886

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Trietsch D (1998) The harmonic rule for process setup adjustment with quadratic loss. J Qual Technol 30(1):75–84

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wu Z, Shamsuzzaman M, Pan ES (2004) Optimization design of control charts based on Taguchi’s loss function and random process shift. Int J Prod Res 42(2):379–390

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ikuo Arizono.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morita, M., Arizono, I., Nakase, I. et al. Economical operation of the C pm control chart for monitoring process capability index. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43, 304–311 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1703-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1703-2

Keywords

Navigation