Skip to main content
Log in

Damage detection in assembly fixtures using non-destructive electromechanical impedance sensors and multivariate statistics

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dimensional integrity of assembled products is a critical factor in defining product functionality and process productivity. It has been reported that fixture faults are one of the root causes of defective sheet metal assemblies. Therefore, integrating new sensor technologies into manufacturing process fixtures will have a direct impact on improving assembly system quality by helping to detect fixture faults faster. A piezoelectric impedance sensor combined with multivariate statistical process control (MSPC) is proposed to accurately monitor the structural integrity of locating fixtures. The new sensing and detection methodology reduces costs associated with production downtime due to faulty fixtures. MSPC is utilized due to its inherent advantages over current sensor monitoring techniques, mainly damage metrics. Previously used damage metrics fail to function properly if voltage or measurement variation is observed. Numerous false alarms result along with an inability to reference or calibrate a fixture to a healthy state. Introducing MSPC concepts and methodologies into piezoelectric fixture sensing systems decreases false alarms, enables healthy sensor state identification, and improves monitoring capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ceglarek D, Shi J (1995) Dimensional variation reduction for automotive body assembly. Manuf Rev 8:139–154

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lalande F, Rogers CA, Childs B, Chaudhry Z (1996) High-frequency impedance analysis for NDE of complex precision parts. SPIE—Smart Structures and Materials, Bellingham, WA, pp 237–243

    Google Scholar 

  3. Park G, Cudney H, Inman DJ (2000) Impedance-based health monitoring of civil structural components. ASCE J Infrastruct Mater Syst Struct 11(6):448–455

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ayres JW, Lalande F, Chaudhry Z, Rogers CA (1998) Qualitative impedance-based health monitoring of civil infrastructures. Smart Mater Struct 7(5):599–605 doi:10.1088/0964-1726/7/5/004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Park G, Cudney H, Inman DJ (2003) Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward. Shock Vibr Dig 35(6):451–463 doi:10.1177/05831024030356001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thien AB (2006) Pipeline structural health monitoring using macro-fiber composite active sensors. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) thesis/dissertation

  7. Giurgiutiu V, Rogers C (2003) Active sensors for health monitoring of aging aerospace structures. Int J Cond Monit Diagn Eng Manage 6(1):3–21

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gyekenyesi AL, Martin RE, Sawicki JT, Baaklini GY (2005) Damage assessment of aerospace structural components by impedance based health monitoring. NASA Technical Report 213579

  9. Simmers GE Jr (2005) Impedance-based structural health monitoring to detect corrosion. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University thesis

  10. Bhalla S, Naidu ASK, Ong CW, Soh CK (2002) Practical issues in the implementation of electromechanical impedance technique for NDE. In: Proceedings of the SPIE International Symposium on Smart Materials, Nano-, and Micro-Smart Systems, December 16–18, Melbourne, Australia (paper no 4935-77)

  11. Peairs DM, Park G, Inman DJ (2004) Improving accessibility of the impedance-based structural health monitoring method. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 15(2):129–139 doi:10.1177/1045389X04039914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tseng KK-H, Naidu ASK (2002) Non-parametric damage detection and characterization using smart piezoceramic material. Smart Mater Struct 11(3):317–329 doi:10.1088/0964-1726/11/3/301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giurgiutiu V, Zagrai A (2005) Damage detection in thin plates and aerospace structures with the electro-mechanical impedance method. Struct Health Monitoring Int J 4(2):99–118 doi:10.1177/1475921705049752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Grisso BL (2004) Considerations of the impedance method, wave propagation, and wireless systems for structural health monitoring. Mechanical Engineering thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 108 pp

  15. Camelio JA, Heichelbech B (2006) Comparison of diagnosis methodologies on sheet metal assembly. Trans NAMRI/SME XXXIV:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dreyer JT, Pandit SM, Bett TA, Milbrodt P, Ungpiyakul T (2006) Application of data dependent systems modeling to failure prediction in non-stationary manufacturing processes. Trans NAMRI/SME XXXIV:461–469

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1998) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rickli J, Camelio J (2007) Monitoring and diagnosis of assembly fixture faults using multivariate control charts and surface scanning content. Proceedings of MSEC 2007, October 15–18, Atlanta, Georgia

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime A. Camelio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rickli, J.L., Camelio, J.A. Damage detection in assembly fixtures using non-destructive electromechanical impedance sensors and multivariate statistics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42, 1005–1015 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1657-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1657-4

Keywords

Navigation