Abstract
Ultrasonic techniques have the potential to be used to detect sub-surface defects in aluminium castings. However, ultrasonic sensing techniques have not been successfully used to detect sub-surface defects in aluminium die castings with rough surfaces or in the ‘as-cast’ state due to the poor quality of signals. Ultrasonic signal noise caused by rough surfaces and grain size variations of the castings is difficult to eliminate. Hence, there is a need to process noisy ultrasonic signals to identify defects within the rough surface castings. This paper documents an investigation of ultrasonic signal analysis using artificial neural networks and hybrid signal pre-processing approaches for the purpose of detecting defects from noisy ultrasonic signals. In this investigation, ultrasonic signals were obtained from aluminium castings with different levels of surface roughness. The signals were first pre-processed using hybrid signal analysis techniques and then classified using an artificial neural network classifier. The hybrid pre-processing techniques utilised various combinations of fast Fourier transform (FFT), wavelet transform (WT) and principal component analysis. The best signal classification performance was generally achieved with a hybrid WT/FFT signal pre-processing technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Long J (1998) Nondestructive testing: 5 ways to ensure defect-free deliveries. Mod Cast 88(4):49–52
Palanisamy S, Nagarajah C R, and Iovenitti P 2004 A study on ultrasonic flaw detection of aluminium die castings, 8th Int., Conf., on Manufacturing & Management, volume 1, pp 61–8
Thavasimuthu M, Rajagopalan C, Kalyanasundaram P, Raj B (1996) Improving the evaluation sensitivity of an ultrasonic pulse echo technique using a neural network classifier. NDT Int 29(3):175–179 doi:10.1016/0963-8695(96)80001-5
Demuth H, Beale M (1998) Neural network toolbox for use with MATLAB. The Math Works, Inc., Natick
Brigham OE (1979) The fast fourier transform. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
Chen CF, Teng YS, Chen CY (2003) Combination of PCA and wavelet transforms for face recognition on 2.5D images In: Proc., of Image & Vision Computing, Palmerston North, New Zealand, pp 343–347
Matalgah M, Knopp J (1995) Time-varying spectral analysis of non-stationary signals based on wavelet and Fourier transforms. Electronics 78(3):463–476 doi:10.1080/00207219508926177
Wang RL, Hua TJ, Wang J, Fan YJ (1994) Combination of FT and WT for fingerprint recognition. SPIE–Wavelet Applications 2242:260–270
Sastry KLA, Karen MM, Ajitkumar PM, Mary CV (1994) Mixed Fourier/wavelet transforms analysis of biological signals, Eng., in Medicine and Biology Society, Eng., Advances: New Opportunities for Biomedical Engineers. Proc., of the 16th Annual Int., Conf., of the IEEE, 2, 1226–1227
Palanisamy S, Nagarajah CR, Iovenitti P (2003) Automated ultrasonic classification of defects in aluminium die castings, Tran., of 22nd Int., Die Casting Congress, Indiana, USA, 1, 93–100
Palanisamy S, Nagarajah CR, Iovenitti P (2005) Effects of grain size and surface roughness on ultrasonic testing of aluminium alloy die castings. Mater Eval 63(8):832–836
Thavasimuthu M, Rajagopalan C, Kalyanasundaram P, Raj B (1996) Improving the evaluation sensitivity of an ultrasonic pulse echo technique using a neural network classifier. NDT Int 29(3):175–179 doi:10.1016/0963-8695(96)80001-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palanisamy, S., Nagarajah, C.R., Graves, K. et al. A hybrid signal pre-processing approach in processing ultrasonic signals with noise. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42, 766–771 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1640-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1640-0