Skip to main content
Log in

Another view of dual response surface modeling and optimization in robust parameter design

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robust parameter design (RPD) based on the concept of building quality into a design has received much attention from researchers and practitioners for years, and a number of methodologies have been studied in the research community. There have been many attempts to integrate RPD principles with well-established statistical techniques, such as response surface methodology, in order to model the response directly as a function of control factors. In this paper, we reinvestigate the dual response approach based on quadratic models Vinning and Myers (J Qual Technol 22:38–45), which is often referred to in the RPD literature and demonstrate that higher-order polynomial models may be more effective in finding better RPD solutions than the commonly-used quadratic model. We also propose optimization models for each of the three classes of quality characteristics (i.e., nominal-the-best, larger-the-better, and smaller-the-better). The optimal solutions obtained using the proposed models are compared with the solutions obtained using the RPD techniques in the current literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering. UNIPBUK/Krans International: White Plains, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Taguchi G (1987) Systems of experimental design: engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize cost. UNIPBUK/Krans International: White Plains, NY

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nair VN, Shoemaker AC (1990) The role of experimentation in quality engineering: a review of Taguchi’s contribution. Design and analysis of industrial experiments. NY: Marcel Dekker, pp. 247–277

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vining GG, Myers RH (1990) Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: a dual response approach. J Qual Technol 22:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  5. Myers RH, Carter WH Jr (1973) Response surface techniques for dual response systems. Technometrics 15:301–317

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoerl AE (1959) Optimum solution of many variables equations. Chem Eng Prog 55:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  7. Draper NR (1963) Ridge analysis of response surfaces. Technometrics 5:469–479

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Myers RH (1976) Response surface methodology. Department of Statistics, Virginia Polythechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg

    Google Scholar 

  9. Box GEP, Draper NR (1987) Empirical model building and response surface. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khuri AI, Cornell JA (1996) Response surfaces: design and analyses. Decker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Umland AW, Smith WN (1959) The use of Lagrange multipliers with response surfaces. Technometrics 1(3):289–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Del Castillo E, Montgomery DC (1995) A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. J Qual Technol 25:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cho BR (1994) Optimization issues in quality engineering. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Oklahoma, USA

  14. Lin DKJ, Tu W (1995) Dual response surface optimization. J Qual Technol 27:34–39

    Google Scholar 

  15. Copeland KAF, Nelson PR (1996) Dual response optimization via direct function minimization. J Qual Technol 28:331–336

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim K, Lin DKJ (1998) Response surface optimization: a fuzzy modeling approach. J Qual Technol 30:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  17. Del Castillo E, Fan SK, Semple J (1997) Computation of global optima in dual response systems. J Qual Technol 29:347–353

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fan SKS (2000) A generalized global optimization algorithm for dual response systems. J Qual Technol 32:444–456

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim YJ, Cho BR (2002) Development of priority-based robust design. Qual Eng 14:355–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang LC, Xu K (2002) Unified approach for dual response optimization. J Qual Technol 34(4):437–447

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Köskoy O, Doganaksoy N (2003) Joint optimization of mean and standard deviation using response surface methods. J Qual Technol 35:239–252

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lam SW, Tang LC (2005) A hraphical spproach to thedual response robust design approach. Reliability and maintainability symposium. Proceedings. Annual. pp. 200–206

  23. Vining GG, Kowalski SM, Montgomery DC (2005) Response surface designs within a split-plot structure. J Qual Technol 37(2):115–129

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kowalski SM, Vining GG, Montgomery DC, Borror CM (2006) Modifying a central composite design to model the process mean and variance when there are hard-to-change factors. Appl Stat 55(5):615–630

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Kunert J, Auer C, Erdbrugge M, Ewers R (2007) An experiment to compare Taguchi’s product array and the combined array. J Qual Technol 39(1):17–34

    Google Scholar 

  26. Del Castilllo E, Alvarez MJ, Ilzarbe L, Viles E (2007) A new design criterion for robust parameter experiments. J Qual Technol 39(3):279–295

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nelder JA, Lee Y (1991) Generalized linear models for the analysis of Taguchi-type experiments. Appl Stoch Models and Data Analysis 7:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee Y, Nelder JA (1998) Robust design via generalized linear models. Can J Stat 8(26):95–105

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee Y, Nelder JA (2003) Robust design via generalized linear models. J Qual Technol 35:2–12

    Google Scholar 

  30. Engel J, Huele AF (1996) A generalized linear model approach to robust design. Technometrics 25:365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Myers WR, Brenneman WA, Myers RH (2005) A dual-response approach to robust parameter design for a generalized linear model. J Qual Technol 37(2):130–138

    Google Scholar 

  32. Robinson TJ, Wulff SS, Montgomery DC (2006) Robust parameter design using generalized linear mixed models. J Qual Technol 38(1):65–75

    Google Scholar 

  33. Montgomery DC, Peck EA (1992) Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York

  34. Mallows CL (1964) Choosing variables in a linear regression: a graphical aid. Central regional meeting of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Manhattan, Kansas

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. B. Shaibu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaibu, A.B., Cho, B.R. Another view of dual response surface modeling and optimization in robust parameter design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41, 631–641 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1509-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1509-2

Keywords

Navigation