Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of variations in the riveting process on the quality of riveted joints

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 05 July 2008

An Erratum to this article was published on 05 July 2008

Abstract

Sheet metal parts are widely used in the assembly of aircraft. The most common method of assembling sheet metal parts is through riveting. Failure of a rivet can have severe consequences in terms of loss of human lives and money. There are many parameters associated with a riveting process that directly affect the quality of rivets including squeeze force, rivet length, rivet diameter, and hole diameter tolerance. Incorrect selection or variations in these parameters could induce excessive residual stresses that result in stress concentration sites and initiate cracks, and also result in improper rivet head deformation leading to loose rivets. This paper presents a study of the effect of the aforementioned riveting parameters on the quality of a formed rivet using finite element simulation. The study was part of a larger project carried out for the local aircraft industry and hence, uses the inch system. The research is conducted on a 1/8″ (0.125″) diameter rivet and a 0.064″ thick aluminum sheet. The results indicate that under normal variations in the riveting process parameters, when using the recommended countersunk depth of 0.042″ for rivet hole, most rivets that are formed will not meet the quality requirements. This is primarily due to the existence of a gap between the formed rivet and the hole. Decreasing the countersunk depth to 0.032″ allows for a higher range of hole and rivet diameter tolerances, as well as an increase in the range of squeeze force that can be applied without violating the quality requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Szolwinski MP, Farris TN (2000) Linking riveting process parameters to the fatigue performance of riveted aircraft structures. J Aircr 37(1):130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Military Standardization Handbook (1994) Metallic materials and elements for aerospace vehicles structures (MIL-HDBK-5G) Defense Automated Printing Services, Philadelphia

  3. Reithmaier L (1991) Standard aircraft handbook, Tab Aero (5th edn.). Blue Ridge Summit, PA

  4. Smith CR (1957) The fatigue strength of riveted joints. Aircr Eng 32(375):142–144

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frost NE, Marsh KJ, Pook LP (1974) Metal fatigue. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Seliger V (1943) Effect of rivet pitch upon the fatigue strength of single-row riveted joints of 0.025 inch 24S-T alclad. NACA TN 900

  7. Holt M (1950) Results of shear fatigue tests of joints with 3/16″ diameter 24S-T31 rivets in 0.064″ thick alclad sheet. NACA TN 2012

  8. Heywood RB (1962) Designing against fatigue. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Endurance of riveted lap joints (aluminum alloy sheet and rivets) (1979) ESDU Data Sheets No. 79031. Engineering Sciences Data Unit, London

  10. Ekvall JCE (1986) Fatigue of riveted metallic joints. ASTM STP 927, pp 172–189

  11. Fung CP, Smart J (1996) An experimental and numerical analysis of riveted single lap joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng 208:79–90

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iyer K, Rubin CA, Hahn GT (1999) Three-dimensional analysis of single rivet row lap joints - Part I: Elastic response. Recent Adv Solids Struct 398:23–39

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iyer K, Rubin CA, Hahn GT (1999) Three-dimensional analysis of single rivet row lap joints - Part II: Elastic-Plastic response. Recent Adv Solids Struct 398:41–57

    Google Scholar 

  14. Silva LFM (2000) Multiple site damage in riveted lap-joints: experimental simulation and finite element prediction. Int J Fatigue 22:319–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Muller RPG (1995) An experimental and analytical investigation on the fatigue behavior of fuselage riveted lap joints. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands

  16. Li G, Shi G (2004) Effect of the riveting process on the residual stress in fuselage lap joints. Can Aeronaut Space J 50(2):91–105

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Li G, Shi G, Bellinger NC (2005) Studies of residual stress in single-row countersunk riveted lap joints. 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Austin, Texas, pp 18–21

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Hossein Cheraghi.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1593-3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheraghi, S.H. Effect of variations in the riveting process on the quality of riveted joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39, 1144–1155 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1291-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1291-6

Keywords

Navigation