Skip to main content
Log in

A new technique for directly measuring the position errors of a 3-axis machine. Part 2: application

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To expand the measurement range of the method introduced in part 1 of this paper series, a pyramid array artifact is proposed and calibrated on a CMM. In the calibration procedure, the distance between the pyramids is presented by data from three groups. Then in the measurement procedure, the position changes are calculated from both calibration and measurement data. In addition, the error induced by manufacture can be reduced or erased in these two procedures. After calibration by a high-accuracy CMM or machine tools, the developed device can also have the same accuracy as these tools. The developed device has been tested using an actual machine tool. The measurement results of the proposed device were checked by other high-accuracy measuring systems, and the comparison showed good agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang Y (2000) Laser-CCD based 6 degree-of-freedom machine error measuring system. PhD thesis, University of California, Davis

  2. Ondrej S, Pavel B (2004) Definitions and correlations of 3D volumetric positioning errors of CNC machining centers. IMTS 2004 manufacturing conference, Chicago, Il, 8–10 September

  3. Okafor AC, Yalcin ME (2000) Derivation of machine tool error models and error compensation procedure for three axes vertical machining center using rigid body kinematics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:1199–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi JP, Min BK, Lee SJ (2004) Reduction of machining errors of a three-axis machine tool by on-machine measurement and error compensation system. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:2056–2064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Srivastava AK, Veldhuis SC, Elbestawi MA (1995) Modeling geometric and thermal errors in a five-axes CNC machine tool. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(9):1321–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2000) Error compensation in machine tools—a review. Part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:1235–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pahk H, Kim Y, Moon J (1997) A new technique for volumetric error assessment of CNC machine tools incorporating ball bar measurement and 3D volumetric error model. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37(11):1583–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim K, Kim MK (1991) Volumetric accuracy analysis based on generalized geometric error model in multi-axis machine tools. Mech Mach Theory 26(2):207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang SM, Ehmann KF (1999) Measurement methods for the position errors of a multi-axis machine. Part 2: application and experimental results. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 39:1485–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ziegert JC, Mize CD (1994) The laser ball bar: a new instrument for machine tool metrology. Precis Eng 16(4):259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Y. Mao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mao, X.Y., Li, B., Shi, H.M. et al. A new technique for directly measuring the position errors of a 3-axis machine. Part 2: application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35, 1085–1089 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1229-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1229-z

Keywords

Navigation