Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of the ANN and RSM modeling approaches for predicting burr size in drilling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the comparison of the burr size predictive models based on artificial neural networks (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM). The models were developed based on three-level full factorial design of experiments conducted on AISI 316L stainless steel work material with cutting speed, feed, and point angle as the process parameters. The ANN predictive models of burr height and burr thickness were developed using a multilayer feed forward neural network, trained using an error back propagation learning algorithm (EBPA), which is based on the generalized delta rule. The performance of the developed ANN models were compared with the second-order RSM mathematical models of burr height and thickness. The comparison clearly indicates that the ANN models provide more accurate prediction compared to the RSM models. The details of experimentation, model development, testing, and performance comparison are presented in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gillespie LK (1979) Deburring precision miniature parts. Precis Eng 1(4):189–198

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Gillespie LK (1975) Burrs produced by drilling. Bendix Corporation, Unclassified Topical Report, BDX-613-1248

  3. Gillespie LK, Blotter PT (1976) The formation and properties of machining burrs. ASME J Eng Ind 98(2):66–74

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sugawara A, Inagaki K (1982) Effect of workpiece structure on burr formation in micro-drilling. Precis Eng 4(1):9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pande SS, Relekar HP (1986) Investigations on reducing burr formation in drilling. Int J Mach Tool Des Res 26(3):339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stein JM, Dornfeld DA (1997) Burr formation in drilling miniature holes. Ann CIRP 46(1):63–66

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim J, Dornfeld DA, Furness RJ (1999) Experimental study of burr formation in drilling of intersection holes with gun and twist drills. Trans NAMRI/SME 27:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dornfeld DA, Kim JS, Dechow H, Hewson J, Chen LJ (1999) Drilling burr formation in titanium alloy, Ti-6Al-4V. Ann CIRP 48(1):73–76

    Google Scholar 

  9. Min S, Dornfeld DA, Nakao Y (2003) Influence of exit surface angle on drilling burr formation. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 125(4):637–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ko S-L, Chang J-E, Kalpakjian S (2003) Development of drill geometry for burr minimization in drilling. Ann CIRP 52(1):45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin T-R (2002) Cutting behavior of a TiN-coated carbide drill with curved cutting edges during the high-speed machining of stainless steel. J Mater Proces Technol 127:8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin T-R (2002) Cutting behaviour using variable feed and variable speed when drilling stainless steel with TiN-coated carbide drills. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:629–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Achyutha BT, Siddeswarappa B (2005) GA applications to RSM based models for burr size reduction in drilling. J Scient Ind Res 64:347–353

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Achyutha BT, Siddeswarappa B (2006) Taguchi approach with multiple performance characteristics for burr size minimization in drilling. J Scient Ind Res 65:977–981

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Achyutha BT, Siddeswarappa B (2007) Methodology of Taguchi optimization for multi-objective drilling problem to minimize burr size. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Achyutha BT, Siddeswarappa B, Davim JP (2007) Predicting burr size in drilling of AISI 316L stainless steel using response surface analysis. Int J Mater Prod Technol (in press)

  17. Min S, Kim J, Dornfeld DA (2001) Development of a drilling burr control chart for low alloy steel, AISI 4118. J Mater Process Technol 113:4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim J, Dornfeld DA (2000) Development of a drilling burr control chart for stainless steel. Trans NAMRI/SME 28:317–322

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim J, Min S, Dornfeld DA (2001) Optimization and control of drilling burr formation of AISI 304L and AISI 4118 based on drilling burr control charts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:923–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo YB, Dornfeld DA (1998) Finite element analysis of drilling burr minimization with a backup material. Trans NAMRI/SME 26:207–212

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guo YB, Dornfeld DA (2000) Finite element modeling of burr formation process in drilling 304 stainless steel. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 122(4):612–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Min S, Dornfeld DA, Kim J, Shyu B (2001) Finite element modeling of burr formation in metal cutting. Mach Sci Technol 5(3):307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kosko B (1994) Neural networks and fuzzy systems. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schalkoff RB (1997) Artificial neural networks. McGraw-Hill International Edition, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim DH, Kim DJ, Kim BM (1999) The application of neural networks and statistical methods to process design in metal forming processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15:886–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tong KW, Kwong CK, Yu KM (2004) Process optimisation of transfer moulding for electronic packages using artificial neural networks and multiobjective optimisation techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:675–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Özel T, Karpat Y (2005) Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bagci E, Işık B (2006) Investigation of surface roughness in turning unidirectional GFRP composites by using RS methodology and ANN. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cochran WG, Cox GM (1992) Experimental designs, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Montgomery DC (2003) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. MathWorks Inc. (2005) MATLAB user manual version 7.1 R14. MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. N. Gaitonde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karnik, S.R., Gaitonde, V.N. & Davim, J.P. A comparative study of the ANN and RSM modeling approaches for predicting burr size in drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38, 868–883 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1140-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1140-7

Keywords

Navigation