Design solution evaluation for metal forming product development
- 196 Downloads
In the current metal forming product development paradigm, the simultaneous and optimal design of product, process and forming system is a non-trivial issue as there are many affecting factors which interact and interplay each other. In the up-front design process, the systematic evaluation and verification of design solution is critical as this could shift the product development paradigm from traditionally trial-and-error and heuristic know-how to more scientific calculation, analysis and simulation. To ensure the efficient and accurate assessment and evaluation of design solution generation, state-of-the-art technologies need to be developed. In this paper, a methodology for systematic evaluation and verification of the simultaneous design of metal forming product, process, and forming system is presented. The factors which affect these designs are first articulated and how they interact and interplay are described. The importance of the systematic evaluation of designs is, thus, figured out. In addition, the role that CAE simulation plays in this process is explained. To evaluate the design, detailed evaluation criteria are developed and how the criteria are used through CAE simulation technology to reveal the behaviors and performances of designs is articulated. Through case studies, the developed technology is illustrated and its efficiency is finally verified.
KeywordsDesign solution evaluation CAE simulation Metal forming product development
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Fuh JYH, Zhang YF, Nee AYC, Fu MW (2004) Computer-aided injection mould design and manufacture. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kobayashi S, Oh SI, Altan T (1989) Metal Forming and the Finite-element Method. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bariani PF, Negro TD, Bruschi S (2004) Testing and modeling of material response to deformation in bulk metal forming. Annals of the CIRP 53(2)Google Scholar
- 6.Fu MW, Yong MS, Muramatsu T (2007) Die fatigue life design and assessment via CAE simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, on-lineGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fu MW, Yong MS, Tong KK, Wong CC (2005) CAE supported design solution generation in metal forming product development. Trans of the NAMRC 33:375–382Google Scholar
- 8.Lange K, Cser L, Geiger M, Kals JAG (1992) Tool life and tool quality in bulk metal forming. Annals pf the CIRP 41(2):667–675Google Scholar
- 10.Geiger M, Merklein M, Kerausch M (2004) Finite element simulation of deep drawing of tailored heat treated blanks. CIRP Annals 53(2):223–226Google Scholar
- 18.Cho H, Ngaile G, Altan T (2003) Simultaneous determination of flow stress and interface friction by finite element based inverse analysis technique. Annals of CIRP 52:221–224Google Scholar
- 19.Mamalis AG, Johnson W (1987) Defects in the processing of metals and composites. In: Predeleanu M (ed) Computational methods for predicting material processing defects. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 26.Scientific forming Technologies Corporation (2007) DEFORM™ 3D v6.01 User’s ManualGoogle Scholar