Skip to main content
Log in

The application of abductive networks and FEM to predict the limiting drawing ratio in sheet metal forming processes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The deep drawing process, one of the sheet metal forming methods, is very useful in the industrial field because of its efficiency. The limiting drawing ratio (LDR) is affected by many material and process parameters, such as the strain-hardening exponent, the plastic strain ratio, friction and lubrication, the blank holder force, the presence of drawbeads, the profile radius of the die and punch, etc. In order to verify the finite element method (FEM) simulation results of the LDR, the experimental data are compared with the results of the current simulation. The influences of the process parameters such as the blank holder force, the profile radius of the die, the clearance between the punch and the die, and the friction coefficient on the LDR are also examined. The abductive network was then applied to synthesize the data sets obtained from the numerical simulation. The predicted results of the LDR from the prediction model are in good agreement with the results obtained from the FEM simulation. By employing the predictive model, it can provide valuable references to the prediction of the LDR under a suitable range of process parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woo DM (1965) The stretching forming test. Eng 200:876–880

    Google Scholar 

  2. Odell EI, Clausen WE (1977) Numerical solution of a deep-drawing problem. ASME J Eng Ind 99:206–209

    Google Scholar 

  3. Korhonen AS (1982) Drawing force in deep drawing of cylindrical cup with flat-nosed punch. J Eng Ind 104(1):29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobayashi S, Oh S-I, Altan T (1989) Metal forming and the finite element method. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hrivnak A, Sobotova L (1992) Influence of the deformational ageing and the conditions of stress on the properties of the deep-drawing steel sheet. J Mater Process Technol 34(1–4):425–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Date PP, Padmanabhan KA (1992) On the prediction of the forming-limit diagram of sheet metals. Int J Mech Sci 34(5):363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yossifon S, Tirosh J (1991) On the dimensional accuracy of deep drawing products by hydroforming processes. Int J Mech Sci 33(4):279–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang Y-M, Chen J-W (1995) Influence of the die arc on formability in cylindrical cup-drawing. J Mater Process Tech 55(3–4):360–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang Y-M, Cheng J-W (1997) Influence of lubricant on limitation of formability of cylindrical cup-drawing process. J Mater Process Tech 63(1–3):77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moshksar MM, Zamanian A (1997) Optimization of the tool geometry in the deep drawing of aluminium. J Mater Process Tech 72(3):363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang TS, Hsu YC (2006) An analysis of the hemisphere deep drawing process of metal sheet. J Chi Soc Mech Eng 27(1):81–86

    Google Scholar 

  12. Woo DM (1968) On the complete solution of the deep-drawing problem. Int J Mech Sci 10:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin JC (2002) Prediction of rolling force and deformation in three-dimensional cold rolling by using the finite-element method and a neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(11):799–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin FC, Lin SY (2002) Radius ratio estimation and fold situation prediction of the deformation profile in forging-extrusion process. Comput Struct 80(24):1817–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin SY, Lin FC (2003) Prediction of fold defect in barreling formations of cylinder upsetting. Finite Elem Anal Des 39(4):325–341

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin FC, Kwan CT (2004) Application of abductive network and FEM to predict an acceptable product on T-shape tube hydroforming process. Comput Struct 82(15–16):1189–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Scientific Forming Technologies (2003) DEFORM-2D user’s manual, version 8.0. Scientific Forming Technologies Corporation, Columbus, Ohio

  18. Ivakhnenko AG (1971) Polynomial theory of complex systems. IEEE Trans Syst 1(4):364–378

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Patrikar A, Provence J (1996) Nonlinear system identification and adaptive control using polynomial networks. Math Comput Modeling 23(1–2):159–173

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Barron AR (1984) Predicted square error: a criterion for automatic model selection. In: Farlow SJ (ed) Self-organizing methods in modeling: GMDH type algorithms. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tung-Sheng Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, TS. The application of abductive networks and FEM to predict the limiting drawing ratio in sheet metal forming processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37, 58–69 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0949-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0949-4

Keywords

Navigation