Abstract
Burnishing, a plastic deformation process, is becoming more popular in satisfying the increasing demands of machine component performance and reliability. Thus, investigating the burnishing parameters in order to improve the product quality is especially crucial. The objective of this research is to evaluate the effect of different burnishing conditions on surface microhardness, surface roughness, and form accuracy. Orthogonal central composite experiment design was used to select the input parameters making them into the right order. Optimum burnishing parameters were established to minimize roughness and/or maximize surface hardening. Emperical formulas were developed to predict the surface microhardness and roughness of leaded brass obtained by burnishing under lubricated conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kukielka L (1989) Designating the field areas for the contact of a rotary burnishing element with the rough surface of a part, providing high-quality product. J Mech Work Technol 19:319–356
Kalpakjian S (1995) Manufacturing engineering and technology, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, New York, USA
Pandey PC, Singh CK (1995) Production engineering sciences, 6th edn. Nai Sarak, Delhi
Sharma P (1999) Production engineering. Schand, India
El-Axir MH (2000) An investigation into roller burnishing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:1603–1617
El-Khabeery MM, El-Axir MH (2000) Experimental techniques for studying the effect of milling roller-burnishing parameters on surface integrity. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:1705–1719
Loh NH, Tam SC, Miyazawa S (1989) A study of the effect of ball-burnishing parameters on surface roughness using factorial design. J Mech Work Technol 18:53–61
Niberg AN (1987) Wear resistance of sideways strengthened by burnishing. Sov Eng Res 7:67
Michael PC, Saka N, Rabinowicz E (1989) Burnishing and adhesive wear of an electrically conductive polyster carbon film. Wear 132:235
Fattouh M, El-Khabeery MM (2000) Residual stress distribution in burnishing solution treated and aged 7075 aluminum alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 29:153
PDI Webmaster (2000, November 30) Surface metrology guide. http://www.predev.com/smg/parameters.htm
Yang JL, Chen JC (2001) A systematic approach for identifying optimum surface roughness performance in end-milling operations. J Ind Technol 17:1–8
Davis J (1989) Metals handbook, 9th edn., machining, Vol. 16. ASM, Materials Park, OH, USA
Mitsui K (1985) In-process sensors for surface roughness and their application. Precis Eng 9:212–220
Shin YC, Oh SJ, Coker SA (1995) Surface roughness measurement by ultrasonic sensing for in-process monitiring. J Eng Ind 117:439–447
NewAge Testing Instruments Inc. (2006) http://www.hardnesstesters.com/microhardnesstester
Augambaev M, Ivanov A, Terekhov Y (1993) Principles of planning of experimental research. Ukituvchi, Tashkent, Yzbekstan Republic, Russia
Das MN, Giri NG (1980) Design and analysis of experimentals, 2nd edn. Willey, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abu Shreehah, T.A. Developing and investigating of elastic ball burnishing tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36, 270–279 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0838-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0838-2