Skip to main content
Log in

Process mean, process tolerance, and use time determination for product life application under deteriorating process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robust design can significantly improve a producer’s competitive ability to deliver high-quality products with low development cycle time, quality loss, failure cost, and tolerance cost. However, during usage by a consumer, the functional performance of a product or some of its components may change as use time passes, leading to unexpected product failure that is usually costly in both time and money. The cost of these failures may influence the determination of optimal use time and optimal initial settings as compensation for the possible process mean changes during consumer usage. In addition to finding use time and initial settings for proper quality performance, the determination of process mean and tolerance also needs to be considered. As is known, changes in process means acquired quality loss and variability, while process tolerance has an effect on tolerance-related costs and quality loss. Because there exists a dependency among use time, initial setting of process mean, process mean, and process tolerance, these values must be determined simultaneously. Thus, in this paper, an optimization model with an acceptable reliability value is developed to minimize total cost, including quality loss, failure cost, and tolerance cost, by determining optimal use time, initial settings, process mean, and process tolerance, simultaneously. Applications of single and multiple components are presented to explain the proposed models. Finally, sensitivity analysis and model discussions on some decision variables are performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Fawzan MA, Rahim MA (2001) Optimal control of a deteriorating process with a quadratic loss function. Qual Reliab Eng Int 17:459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A, Raman R (1998) GAMS: a user’s guide. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, D.C., USA

  3. Chase KW, Greenwood WH, Loosli BG, Haugland LF (1990) Least cost tolerance allocation for mechanical assemblies with automated process selection. Manuf Rev 3(1):49–59

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drezner Z, Wesolowsky GO (1989) Optimal control of a linear trend process with quadratic loss. IIE Trans 21:66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibra TN (1967) Optimal control of process subject to linear trends. J Ind Eng 18(1):35–41

    Google Scholar 

  6. Irani SA, Mittal RO, Lehtihet EA (1989) Tolerance chart optimization. Int J Prod Res 27(9):1531–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeang A, Yang K (1992) Optimal tool replacement with nondecreasing tool wear. Int J Prod Res 30(2):299–314

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeang A (1996) Tolerance chart balancing for machining process planning. Qual Reliab Eng Int 12:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeang A (2001) Combined parameter and tolerance design optimization with quality and cost reduction. Int J Prod Res 39(5):923–952

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeang A, Tsai SW, Li HC, Hsien CK (2002) A computer model for time-based tolerance design with response surface methodology. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 15(2):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeang A, Chung CP, Hsieh CK (2005) Simultaneous process mean and process tolerance determination with asymmetric loss function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, published online 30 December, DOI 1007/s00170-005-0250-3

  12. Jeang A, Chen T, Li HC, Liang F (2006) Simultaneous process mean and process tolerance determination with adjustment and compensation for precision manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, published online 10 June, DOI 10.1007/s00170-006-0542-2

  13. Kackar RN (1985) Off-line quality control, parameter design, and the Taguchi method. J Qual Technol 17(4):176–198

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kotz S, Johnson NL (1993) Process capability indices. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mittag HJ, Rinne H (1993) Statistical methods of quality assurance. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ngoi BKA (1992) Applying linear programming to tolerance chart balancing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 7(2):187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ngoi BKA, Teck OC (1993) A complete tolerance charting system. Int J Prod Res 31(2):453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ngoi BKA (1993) A matrix approach to tolerance charting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 8(3):175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ngoi BKA, Ong CT (1996) Optimum assembly using a component dimensioning method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 11:172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Phadke MS (1989) Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rahim MA, Tuffaha F (2004) Integrated model for determining the optimal initial setting of the process mean and the optimal production run assuming quadratic loss functions. Int J Prod Res 42(16):3281–3300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheikh AK, Raouf A, Sekerdey UA, Younas M (1999) Optimal tool replacement and resetting strategies in automated manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 37(4):917–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Taguchi G, Elsayed E, Hsiang T (1989) Quality engineering in production systems. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wu Z, Elmaraghy WH, Elmaraghy HA (1988) Evaluation of cost-tolerance algorithm for design tolerance analysis and synthesis. Manuf Rev 1(3):168–179

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang HC, Hug HE (1982) Tolerancing techniques: the state of art. Int J Prod Res 30(9):2111–2135

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angus Jeang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeang, A., Chung, CP. Process mean, process tolerance, and use time determination for product life application under deteriorating process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36, 97–113 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0814-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0814-x

Keywords

Navigation