Abstract
Compliance with environmental regulations is becoming more and more costly for manufacturers as government scrutiny and global trade agreements become more stringent. Metal-cutting fluid use and disposal is a major concern as these environmental issues become more prominent. Gaining a clear understanding of the costs associated with machining coolant/lubricant use can be difficult. Many factors impact this cost, such as the original purchase price, maintenance costs, disposal management and fees, and performance factors related to the particular fluid. This paper develops a detailed cost and performance-based methodology for machining coolant/lubricant selection. A model by which to evaluate the relative impacts of coolant/lubricant decisions on the unit workpiece cost of production is described. At present, a widely accepted methodology is not available for this purpose. The model presented here will assist manufacturing companies of all types in making this critical decision.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ezugwu E, Bonney J, Olajire K (2002) The effect of coolant concentration on the machinability of nickel-base, C-263, alloy. Proc 6th International Tribology Conference, Perth, Western Australia, 515–520
Nicolaou P, Thurston D, Carnahan J (2002) Machining quality and cost: estimation and tradeoffs. J Manuf Sci Eng 124:840–851
Stidham J (1999) A predictive comparative model program to determine the effects of coolant/lubricant use and application methods on machined part cost. MS Thesis, University of Missouri-Rolla
McClure T, Adams R, Gugger M (2004) Comparison of flood vs. microlubrication on machining performance. Unist Technical Paper
El Baradie M (1996) Cutting fluids part two: recycling and clean machining. J Mater Process Technol 56(1):798–806
Sheehan M (1999) Final report of the OSHA metalworking fluids standards advisory committee. Occupational Safety & Health Administration, Washington, DC
Markert K, Corson A (1995) Metalworking fluids technical training manual, Dubois Inc.
Quigley L (1992) Metalworking fluids - at the cutting edge of health and safety. ASTM Standard News, pp 40–43
Silliman J (1992) Cutting and grinding fluids: selection and application. Soc Manuf Eng
Sheng P, Oberwalleny S (1997) Life-cycle planning of cutting fluids—a review. J Manuf Sci Eng 119:791–800
Koelsh J (1997) Lubricity vs. the environment: cascades of cleanliness. Manuf Eng 118(5):50–58
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1983a) Treatability manual: cost estimating. Office of Research and Development, Publication Number EPA-600/2-82-001d
Cozzens D, Rao P, Olson W, Sutherland J, Panetta J (1999) An experimental investigation into the effect of cutting fluid conditions on the boring of aluminum alloys. J Manuf Sci Eng 121(33):434–439
Upton D (1992) A flexible structure for computer-controlled manufacturing systems. Manuf Rev 5(1):58–74
Groover M (2000) Automation, production systems, and computer integrated manufacturing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
DeGarmo E, Black J, Kohser R (2002) Materials and processes in manufacturing, 9th edn. Wiley, New York
Takakuwa S (1997) The use of simulation in activity-based costing for flexible manufacturing systems. Proc 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, INFORMS
TechSolve, Inc. (1980) The machining data handbook. TechSolve, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hubbard, K.M., Callahan, R.N. & Strong, S.D. A standardized model for the evaluation of machining coolant/lubricant costs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36, 1–10 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0806-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0806-x