Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated approach to modularize the conceptual product family architecture

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To meet the increasingly heterogeneous market, a product family strategy is needed to determine how customized variants can be derived from a common product platform within acceptable cost and time. Toward this, a suitably conceived and developed product family architecture (PFA) is important for implementing mass customization. In this paper, we present a systematic approach to modularize PFA at the early design phase, which is the conceptual design stage. The PFA can be viewed as a conceptual structure with the following three interrelated elements: module, variant, and coupling interface. Identifying variant as the external driver of architectural variation, this paper develops a variety index (VI) method to estimate effects of customization on the conceptual modules. Rather than just identification of module boundary in the product architecture, the proposed modularization method translates the variety source generated from requirements analysis into a dynamic configuration of the conceptual PFA, involving variety analysis, product modularization, and generation of product portfolio architecture. An example of a power tool design is used to demonstrate the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AMM:

attribute module matrix

NRE:

nonrecurring engineering

PBPF:

platform-based product family

PFA:

product family architecture

PPA:

product portfolio architecture

PPP:

product portfolio planning

QFD:

quality function deployment

VI:

variety index

References

  1. Jiao JX, Tseng MM (1999) A method of developing product family architecture for mass customization. J Intel Manuf 10:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Silveira GD, Borenstein D, Fogliatto FS (2001) Mass customization: literature review and research directions. Int J Prod Econ 72:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer M, Lehnerd A (1997) The power of product platforms, building value and cost leadership. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson TW (2004) Product platform design and customization: status and promise. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 18:3–20

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jose A, Tollenaere M (2005) Modular and platform methods for product family design: literature analysis. J Intell Manuf 16:371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiao JX, Tseng MM (2004) Customizability analysis in design for mass customization. Comput Aided Des 36:745–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res Policy 24:419–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ulrich K, Eppinger SD (2000) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gershenson JK, Prasad GJ, Zhang Y (2003) Product modularity: definitions and benefits. J Eng Des 14(3):295–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mikkola JH, Gassmann O (2003) Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 50(2):204–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Wie MJ, Greer JL, Matthew IC, Stone RB, Wood KL (2001) Interfaces and product architecture. ASME, Conf Proc DETC2001, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

  12. Van Wie MJ, Rajan P et al (2003) Representing product architecture. ASME, Conf Proc DETC2003, Chicago, IL, USA

  13. Holtta KM, Otto KN (2005) Incorporating design effort complexity measures in product architectural design and assessment. Des Stud 26:463–485

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fixson K (2005) Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process and supply chain design decisions. J Oper Manag 23:345–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin MV, Ishii K (2002) Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product family architectures. Res Eng Des 13:213–235

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moore WL, Louviere JJ, Verma R (1999) Using conjoint analysis to help design product platforms. J Prod Innov Manag 16:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujita K, Yoshida H (2004) Product variety optimization simultaneously designing module combination and module attributes. Concurr Eng: Res Appl 12(2):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Simpson TW, Jonathan RA, Farrokh M (2001) Product platform design: method and application. Res Eng Des 13:2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Du XH, Jiao JX, Tseng MM (2001) Architecture of product family: fundamentals and methodology. Concurr Eng: Res Appl 9(4):309–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Erens F, Verhulst K (1997) Architectures for product families. Comput Ind 33:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Muffatto M, Roveda M (2002) Product architecture and platforms: a conceptual framework. Int J Technol Manag 24(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsiao SW, Liu E (2005) A structural component-based approach for designing product family. Comput Ind 56:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiao JX, Tseng MM (2000) Fundamentals of product family architecture. Integr Manuf Syst 11(7):469–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen KM, Liu RJ (2005) Interface strategies in modular product innovation. Technovation 25:771–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Suh NP (2001) Axiomatic Design: Advances and Application. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pullman ME, Moore WL, Wardell DG (2002) A comparison of quality function deployment and conjoint analysis in new product design. J Prod Innov Manag 19:354–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiao JX, Zhang YY, Wang Y (2005) Product portfolio planning with customer-engineering interaction. IIE Trans 37(9):801–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiao JX, Zhang YY, Wang Y (in press) A heuristic genetic algorithm for product portfolio planning. Comput Oper Res

  29. Gonzalez-Zugasti JP, Otto KN, Baker JD (2000) A method for architecture product platforms. Res Eng Des 12:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Weck OL, Suh ES, Chang D (2003) Product family and platform portfolio optimization. ASME, Conf Proc DETC2003, Chicago, IL, USA

  31. Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: A systematic approach. Design Council, London

  32. Stone R, Wood K (2000) Development of a functional basis for design. J Mech Des 122(4):359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Krishnan V, Gupta S (2001) Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development. Manage Sci 47(1):52–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu JS, Gonzalez-Zugasti JP, Otto KN (1999) Product architecture definition based upon customer demands. J Mech Des 121(3):329–335

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dahmus JB, Gonzalez-Zugasti JP, Otto KN (2001) Modular product architecture. Des Stud 22:409–424

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kurtadikar RM, Stone RB, Van Wie MJ, McAdams DA (2004) A customer needs motivated conceptual design methodology for product portfolios. ASME2004, Conf Proc DETC, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

  37. Newcomb PJ, Bras B, Rosen DW (1998) Implications of modularity on product design for life cycle. J Mech Des 120:483–490

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gershenson JK, Prasad GJ, Allamneni S (1999) Modular product design: a life-cycle view. J Integr Des Process Sci 3(4):13–26

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stone R, Wood K, Crawford R (2000) A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures. Des Stud 21:5–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119077, Singapore

    Liu Zhuo, Wong Yoke San & Lee Kim Seng

Authors
  1. Liu Zhuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wong Yoke San
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lee Kim Seng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wong Yoke San.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhuo, L., Yoke San, W. & Kim Seng, L. Integrated approach to modularize the conceptual product family architecture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36, 83–96 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0805-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0805-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation