Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of surface roughness based on super resolution reconstruction algorithm

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, an attempt has been made to use a super resolution image processing algorithm for preprocessing the images over and above existing image quality enhancement techniques. The improved quality images processed using a machine vision system have been used to assess the quality of the surfaces. To ensure the validity of the approach the roughness values quantified using these images are then compared with widely accepted standard mechanical stylus instrument values. Quantification of digital images for surface roughness is performed using two Fourier transform parameters (major peak frequency and principal component magnitude squared value) and the standard deviation of gray level intensity values. Then the group method of data handling (GMDH) technique was used to obtain an analytical relationship of the roughness parameters calculated using the digital surface image and the stylus instrument values. We present in this paper an analysis based on the comparison to make sure that the present approach of estimation of surface finish based on the digital processed image could be implemented in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kiran M, Ramamoorthy B, Radhakrishnan V (1998) Evaluation of surface roughness by vision system. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 38:685–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luk F, Hyunh V, North W (1989) Measurement of surface roughness by a machine vision system. J Phys E 22:977–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-kindi GA, Baul RM, Gill KF (1992) An application of machine vision in the automated inspection of engineering surfaces. Int J Prod Res 2:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jason DG, Rourke JM, Bell AC (1984) High-speed surface roughness measurement. Transactions of ASME 34(106):34–39

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tsai DM, Tseng CF (1999) Surface roughness classification for castings. Pattern Recogn 32:389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kartik A, Chandra S, Ramamoorthy B, Das S (1997) 3D tool wear measurement and visualization using stereo imaging. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 37:1573–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajneesh Kumar, Dhanasekar B, Ramamoorthy B (2005) Application of digital image magnification for surface roughness evaluation using machine vision. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 45:228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee BY, Tarng YS (2001) Surface roughness inspection by computer vision in turning operations. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 41:1251–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Younis MA (1998) On line surface roughness measurements using image processing towards an adaptive control. Comput. Ind. Eng. 35:49–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vandewalle P, Süsstrunk S, Vetterli M (2004) Double resolution from a set of aliased images. Proc. IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging 2004: Sensors and Camera Systems for Scientific, Industrial, and Digital Photography Applications: 5301

  11. Irani M, Peleg S (1991) Improving resolution by image registration. CVGIP, Graph Models Image Process 53:231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsai RY, Huang TS (1984) Multiple frame image restoration and registration. Advances in Computer Vision and Image Processing:317–339

  13. Park SM, Park MK, Kang MG (2003) Super-Resolution Image Construction: A Technical Overview. IEEE Signal Process Mag

  14. Patti AJ, Ibrahim M, Tekalp AM (1997) Super resolution video reconstruction with arbitrary sampling lattices and nonzero aperture time. IEEE Trans Image Process 5:1064–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu S, Jernigan M (1990) Texture analysis and discrimination in additive noise. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 49(1):52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ivakhenko AG (1971) Polynomial theory of complex systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyb 1(4):364–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farlow SJ (1984) The GMDH algorithm, self-organizing methods in modeling. GMDH type algorithms

  18. Keren D, Peleg S, Brada R (1988) Image sequence enhancement using sub-pixel displacement. Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition:742–746

  19. Papoulis A (1975) A new algorithm in spectral analysis and band-limited extrapolation. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 22(9):735–742

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Marcel B, Briot M, Murrieta R (1997) Calcul de translation et rotation par la transformation de Fourier. Traitement du signal 14:135–149

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Vandewalle P, Susstrunk S, Vetterli M (2003) Superresolution images reconstructed from aliased images. SPIE/IS & T Visual Communication and Image Processing Conference 5150:1398–1405

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Ramamoorthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhanasekar, B., Ramamoorthy, B. Assessment of surface roughness based on super resolution reconstruction algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35, 1191–1205 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0799-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0799-5

Keywords

Navigation