Skip to main content
Log in

Irregular shapes classification by back-propagation neural networks

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a back-propagation neural network approach to classify irregular shapes by their convex hulls and brightness in automated production lines. An image-based defect detection and classification system is established, which would examine the quality of rolls of aluminum foil and determine the type of defects, such as bolt, fracture, scratch, or spot on the aluminum foil. The developed approach is capable of performing image acquisition, image processing, defect detection and recognition, and, subsequently, the classification of the aluminum foil sheets by a back-propagation neural network. In order to verify the effectiveness of the developed approach, ten-fold cross-validation is used. The experimental results show that, using a small number of training iterations, the average accuracy rate of classification reaches 96.4%. Thus, the developed approach can be used to replace manual visual inspection for process control and process improvement, which significantly reduces the cost of labor and increases the consistency of product quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang C, Huang L, Rosenfeld A (1991) Detecting clouds and cloud shadows on aerial photographs. Pattern Recogn Lett 12(1):55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu-Yu S, Thonnat M (1992) Using apparent boundary and convex hull for the shape characterization of foraminifera images. In: Proceedings of the 11th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition C: Image, Speech and Signal Analysis, vol III, pp 569–572

  3. Wang YS, Griffiths BJ, Wilkie BA, Silverwood PA, Norgate P (1994) Complex and coloured object inspection. Comput Ind 25(2):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Green K, Eggert D, Stark L, Bowyer K (1995) Generic recognition of articulated objects through reasoning about potential function. Comput Vis Image Underst 62(2):177–193

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsai D-M (1996) Locating overlapping industrial parts for robotic assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 12(4):288–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park J, Kurz L (1996) Unsupervised segmentation of textured images. Inform Sci 92(1–4):255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burge W, Burger M, Mayr W (1996) Learning to recognize generic visual categories using a hybrid structural approach. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’96), Lausanne, Switzerland, vol 2, pp 321–324

  8. Atiquzzaman M (1999) Coarse-to-fine search technique to detect circles in images. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(2):96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deglint HJ, Rangayyan RM (2005) Segmentation of neuroblastoma in CT images using deformable contours, image reconstruction, and convex hulls. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEE International Seminar on Medical Applications of Signal Processing, London, UK, November 2005, pp 29–34

  10. Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sing JK, Basu DK, Nasipuri M, Kundu M (2005) Self-adaptive RBF neural network-based segmentation of medical images of the brain. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Sensing and Information Processing, Chennai, India, January 2005, pp 447–452

  12. Witten LI, Frank E (2005) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Han J, Kamber M (2003) Data mining: concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu K, Luxmoore AR, Deravi F (1997) Comparison of shape features for the classification of wear particles. Eng Appl Artif Intell 10(5):485–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hou T-H, Pern M-D (1999) A computer vision-based shape-classification system using image projection and a neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(11):843–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shiau Y-R, Tsai I-S, Lin C-S (2000) Classifying web defects with a back-propagation neural network by color image processing. Tex Res J 70(7):633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stojanovic R, Mitropulos P, Koulamas C, Karayiannis Y, Koubias S, Papadopoulos G (2001) Real-time vision-based system for textile fabric inspection. J Real-Time Imag 7(6):507–518

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Visen NS, Paliwal J, Jayas DS, White NDG (2004) Image analysis of bulk grain samples using neural networks. J Can Biosyst Eng 46:711–715

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chuang YK, Kusiak A (1994) Grouping parts with a neural network. J Manuf Sys 13(4):262–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bogdanov AV, Sandven S, Johannessen OM, Alexandrov VY, Bobylev LP (2005) Multisensor approach to automated classification of sea ice image data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 43(7):1648–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Iannino A, Shapiro SD (1979) An iterative generalization of the Sobel edge detection operator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Processing. Chicago, Illinois, August 1979, pp 130–137

  22. Kapur JN, Sahoo PK and Wong AKC (1985) A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 29(3):273–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yao AC-C (1981) A lower bound to finding convex hulls. J ACM 28(4):780–787

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Day AM (1988) Planar convex hull algorithms in theory and practice. Comput Graph Forum 7(3):177–193

    Google Scholar 

  25. Matsunaga A, Ogawa K (2000) Scatter correction in multinuclide data acquisition by means of a neural network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Seattle, Washington, October 1999, vol 2, pp 948–952

  26. Salzberg SL (1997) On comparing classifiers: pitfalls to avoid and a recommended approach. Data Min Knowl Disc 1(3):317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuo-Yan Chou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, SW., Chou, SY. & Chen, SC. Irregular shapes classification by back-propagation neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34, 1164–1172 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0667-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0667-3

Keywords

Navigation