A knowledge-based manufacturing and cost evaluation system for product design/re-design

Original Article


Various research studies have concluded that most new design projects are actually re-design activities. This re-design may be for improvement or for reprovision of existing products. Most research efforts for providing computer tools for supporting conceptual or early design mainly concentrated on the design of new products. In practice manufacturing plans generated when an order was placed may quickly become out-dated as the manufacturing environment and constraints often change. It is therefore equally important to regenerate manufacturing plans and re-evaluate design every time a product is changed, re-designed or reordered. This project focuses on manufacturability analysis and provides re-design support for conceptual design of discrete single-piece mechanical parts with emphasis on machined processes. This limitation of implementing the prototype system for re-design activities is not a system design or methodology restriction. The condition has been imposed by the authors as a prelude to validating the system and its results. A novel hybrid approach using a combination of sequential flowchart logic and an expert system has been developed which uses a user-defined feature tree as the input for its analysis. The system allows the designer to estimate manufacturability according to criteria of time and cost, and also to explore different scenarios of parametric variation in the design. A case study has been presented to validate the system’s practicality and usefulness.


Conceptual design Manufacturing and cost evaluation Computer-aided process planning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Boothroyd G (1994) Product design for manufacture and assembly. Comput Aided Des 26(7):505–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rehman S, Guenov MD (1998) A methodology for modelling manufacturing costs at conceptual design. Comput Ind Eng 35(3–4):623–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salomons O, Slooten Fv, Houten FJAM, Kals HJJ (1993) A computer support tool for re-design. Int Conf Eng Des ICED 93 ,The Hague 1559–1570Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang F, Mills JJ, Devarajan V (2002) A conceptual approach to managing design resource. Comput Ind 47:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sivaloganathan S, Shahin TMM (1999) Design reuse an overview. Proc I MECH E B J Eng Manuf 213(7):641–654 (14)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharma R, Gao JX (2002) Implementation of STEP AP224 in an automated manufacturing planning system. Proc I MECH E B J Eng Manuf 216(9):1277–1289Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schreve K, SHR, Basson AH (1999) Manufacturing cost estimation during design of fabricated parts. Proc I MECH E B J Eng Manuf 213(7):731–735 (5)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shehab EM, Abdalla HS (2001) Manufacturing cost modelling for concurrent product development. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 17(4):341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishii K (1993) Modeling of concurrent engineering design. In: Kusiak A (ed) Concurrent engineering: automation, tools and techniques. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mukherjee A, Liu CR (1997) Conceptual design, manufacturability evaluation and preliminary process planning using function-form relationships in stamped metal parts. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 13(3):253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta SK, Nau DS (1995) A systematic approach for analysing the manufacturability of machined parts. Comput Aided Des 27(5):342–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pham DT, Ji C (1999) A concurrent design system for machined parts. Proc I MECH E B J Eng Manuf 213(8):841–846 (6)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng SC, Song EY (2000) Information modeling on conceptual design integrated with process planning, symposia for design for manufacturability—the 2000 international mechanical engineering comgress and exposition. Orlando, Florida, USA, pp 160–168Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kyrssanov VA, Kleshchev A, Fukuda Y, Konishi K (1998) Building a logical model in the machining domain for CAPP expert systems. Int J Prod Res 36(4):1075–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zeir, GV, Kruth J-P, Detand J (1998) A conceptual framework for interactive and blackboard based CAPP. Int J Prod Res 36(6):1453–1473MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Younis MA, Wahab MAA (1997) A CAPP expert system for rotational components. Comput Ind Eng 33(3–4):509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giarratano JC (2000) CLIPS user’s guideGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharma R, Gao JX (1999) A feature model editor for process planning of sheet metal products. 15th International Conference on Computer Aided Production Engineering CAPE ’99. Durham, UK, pp 151–156Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao JX, Tang YS, Sharma R (2000) A feature model editor and process planning system for sheet metal products. J Mater Process Technol 107(1–3):88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Young M (2000) XML step by step. Microsoft PressGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kramer TR (1994) Issues concerning material removal shape element volumes (MRSEVs). Int J Comput Integr Manuf 7(3):139–151Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ISO (2001) Industrial automation systems and integration—product data representation and exchange. Part 224: application protocol: mechanical product defination for process planning using machining featuresGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManufacturingCranfield UniversityBedfordUK

Personalised recommendations