Abstract
The paper presents a feasibility study on prediction of surface roughness in side milling operations using the different polynomial networks. A series of experiments using S45C steel plates is conducted to study the effects of the various cutting parameters on surface roughness. The different polynomial networks for predicting surface roughness are developed using the abductive modeling technique and based on the F-ratio to select their input variables. The results show that the developed models achieve high predicting capability on surface roughness, especially for the case of smaller flank wear of peripheral cutting edge. Hence, it can be concluded that the developed polynomial-network models posses promising potential in the application of predicting surface roughness in side milling operations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alauddin M, EI Baradie MA, Hashmi MSJ (1995) Computer-aided analysis of a surface-roughness model for end milling. J Mater Process Technol 55:123–127
Lou SJ, Chen JC (1999) In-process surface roughness recognition (ISRR) system in end-milling operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15:200–209
Melkote SN, Thangaraj AR (1994) An enhanced end milling surface texture model including the effect of radial rake and primary relief angles. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 116:166–174
Fuh KH, Wu CF (1995) A proposed statistical model for surface quality prediction in end-milling of Al alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(8):1187–1200
Lo S-P (2003) An adaptive-network based fuzzy inference system for prediction of workpiece surface roughness in end milling. J Mater Process Technol 142:665–675
Wang M-Y, Chang H-Y (2004) Experimental study of surface roughness in slot end milling AL2014-T6. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:51–57
Lee B-Y, Juan H, Lin W-Y (2002) The predictive model of surface roughness in the dynamic Turning state. J Technol 17(1):31–36
Fulcher GE, Brown DE (1994) A polynomial network for predicting temperature distributions. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(3):372–379
Barron RL, Mucciardi AN, Cook FJ, Craig JN, Barron AR (1984) Adaptive learning networks: development and application, in the United States, of algorithms related to GMDH. In : Farlow SJ (ed), Self-organizing methods in modeling: GMDH type algorithms. Dekker, New York
Chryssolouris G, Guillot M (1990) A comparison of statistical and AI approaches to the selection of process parameters in intelligent machining. ASME J Eng Ind 112:122–131
Montgomery GJ, Drake KC (1991) Abductive reasoning network. Neurocomputing 2:97–104
Ravindra HV, Raghunandan M, Srinivasa YG, Krishnamurthy R (1994) Tool wear estimation by group method of data handing in turning. Int J Prod Res 32:1295–1312
Barron AR (1984) Predicted-squared-error: a criterion for automatic model selection. In: Farlow SJ (ed), Self-organizing methods in modeling: GMDH type algorithms. Dekker, New York
Ivakhnenko AG (1971) Polynomial theory of complex systems. IEEE Trans System Man Cybernet 1(4):364–378
Farlow SJ (ed) (1984) The GMDH algorithm: self-organizing methods in modeling:GMDH type algorithms. Dekker, New York
Miller GA (1956) The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97
UNLON TOOL (2003) UNLON Tool Catalog v 6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, CK., Lu, H. Study on the prediction model of surface roughness for side milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29, 867–878 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-2604-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-2604-2