Skip to main content
Log in

A predictive model for improving production line performance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diagnosing of the reason for non-performance requires that the behaviour of the line under study be precisely analysed in order to identify potential end-of-line gains. The first section of this article presents existing analytical models for homogenous and non-homogenous line production. The second section applies those analytical models to line production performance diagnosis, injecting input data from a real case study into the models. A predictive model for improving line production performance is proposed and implemented in a diagnosis system. This model generates the production gains that would result from each action and helps the operator to choose the action that will most improve line performance. A case study of a non-homogenous production line is used to illustrate the potential efficiency of our diagnosis system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez Vargas R, Dallery Y, David R (1992) A study of continuous flow model of production lines with unreliable machines and finite buffers. J Manuf Syst 13:221–234

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Gershwin SB (1994) Manufacturing systems engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  3. Dallery Y (1994) On modeling failure and repair times in stochastic models of manufacturing systems using generalized exponential distributions. Queuing Syst 15:199–209

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dallery Y, Gershwin SB (1992) Manufacturing flow line systems: a review of models and analytical results. Queueing Syst: Theory Appl 12:3–94

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dallery Y, David R, Xie X-L (1989) Approximate analysis of transfer lines with unreliable machines and finite buffers. IEEE Trans Automat Control 34(9):943–953

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois D, Forestier J-P (1982) Productivité et en-cours moyen d’un ensemble de deux machines séparées par une zone de stockage. Revue RAIRO 16:105–132

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Burman M-H (1995) New results in flow line analysis. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  8. Commault C, Semery A (1990) Taking into account delays in buffers for analytical performance evaluation of transfer. IIE Trans 22:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  9. Terracol C, David R (1987) An aggregation technique for performance evaluation of transfer lines with unreliable machine and finite buffers. IEEE Conference on Robotics and automation, Raleigh, NC, pp 1333–1337

  10. Patchong A (1997) Méthodes de modélisation, d‘analyse et de diagnostic pour l’amélioration de l‘efficacité d’un atelier de production. Dissertation, LAMIH, Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut-Cambrésis

  11. Gershwin SB (1987) An efficient decomposition algorithm for the approximate evaluation of tandem queues with finite storage space and blocking. Oper Res 35:291–305

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Gershwin SB (1987) Representation and analysis of transfer lines with machines that have different processing rates. Ann Oper Res 9:511–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Le Bihan H, Dallery Y (2000) A robust decomposition method for the analysis of production lines with unreliable machines and finite buffers. Ann Oper Res 93:265–297

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Dallery Y, David R, Xie X-L (1988) An efficient algorithm for analysis of transfer lines with unreliable machine and finite buffers. IIE Trans 20:280–283

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dallery Y, Frein Y (1989) A decomposition method for approximate analysis of closed queuing networks with blocking. In: Perros HG, Aliok T (eds) Qeueing with networks with blocking. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 193–216

  16. Glassey C, Hong Y (1993) The analysis behaviour of an unreliable n-stage automatic transfer line with (n-1) inter-stage buffer storage. Int J Prod Res 31:519–530

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tolio T, Gershwin SB, Matta A (2002) Analysis of two-machine lines with multiple failure modes. IIE Trans 34(1):51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dallery Y, Le Bihan H (1997) Homogenisation techniques for the analysis of production lines with unreliable machines having different speeds. Eur J Control 3:200–215

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Dallery Y, Le Bihan H (1998) An improved decomposition method for the analysis of production lines with unreliable machines and finite buffers. Proc INRIA/IEEE Symposium on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Paris

  20. Frein Y, Commault C, Dallery Y (1992) Analytical performance evaluation of closed transfer lines with limited number of pallets. Proc IEEE Conference on Robotics and automation, pp 1018–1023, Nice, France

  21. Frein Y, Commault C, Dallery Y (1996) Modeling and analysis of closed-loop production lines with unreliable machine and finite buffers. IIE Trans 28:545–554

    Google Scholar 

  22. IEC60863 (1986) International standard. Presentation of reliability, maintainability and availability predictions of systems and equipment, p 23, Bilingual

  23. Cauffriez L, Willaeys D, Defrenne J (1997) Mesure des indicateurs de performances de lignes de production: présentation d’une méthode et retour d’expérience. Journal Européen des systèmes Automatisés Vol. 31/8, (pp. 1297–1310), Hermès. ISSN 0296-1598

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cauffriez L, Willaeys D, Defrenne J (1996) A method and a diagnosis system to value the production performances of manufacturing flow-line systems. IEEE/SMC CESA’96 IMACS Multi-conference, International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Proc 2:814–819, 9–12 July 1996, Lille, France

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Cauffriez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cauffriez, L., Willaeys, D. A predictive model for improving production line performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29, 969–979 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-2583-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-2583-3

Keywords

Navigation