Skip to main content
Log in

Study of key algorithms in topology optimization

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theory of topology optimization based on the solid isotropic material with penalization model (SIMP) method is thoroughly analyzed in this paper. In order to solve complicated topology optimization problems, a hybrid solution algorithm based on the method of moving asymptotes (MMA) approach and the globally convergent version of the method of moving asymptotes (GCMMA) approach is proposed. The numerical instability, which always leads to a non-manufacturing result in topology optimization, is analyzed, along with current methods to control it. To eliminate the numerical instability of topology results, a convolution integral factor method is introduced. Meanwhile, an iteration procedure based on the hybrid solution algorithm and a method to eliminate numerical instability are developed. The proposed algorithms are verified with illustrative examples. The effect and function of the hybrid solution algorithm and the convolution radius in optimization are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bendsoe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71(2):197–224

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Hassani B, Hinton E (1999) Homogenization and structural topology optimization: theory, practice and software. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Mlejnek HP, Schirrmacher R (1993) An engineering approach to optimal material distribution and shape finding. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 106:1–26

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Sigmund O (1994) Design of material structures using topology optimization. PhD thesis, Department of Solid Mechanics, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

  5. Bendsoe MP, Sigmund O (1999) Material interpolations in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech 69(9–10):635–654

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) The COC algorithm, part II: topological, geometry and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89:197–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24:359–373

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Svanberg K (1999) The MMA for modeling and solving optimization problems. In: Proceedings of the Third World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Buffalo, New York, May 1999

  9. Svanberg K (1999) A new globally convergent version of the method of moving asymptotes. Technical report, Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

  10. Svanberg K (1998) Two primal-dual interior-point methods for the MMA subproblems. Technical report TRITA-MAT-1998-0S12, Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

  11. Svanberg K (1995) A globally convergent version of MMA without linesearch. In: Rozvany GIN, Olhoff N (eds) Proceedings of the First World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Goslar, Germany, May/June 1995, pp 9–16

  12. Bruyneel M, Duysinx P, Fleury C (2002) A family of MMA approximations for structural optimization. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 24(4):263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fleury C (1979) Structural weight optimization by dual methods of convex programming. Int J Numer Methods Eng 14:1761–1783

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleury C, Braibant V (1986) Structural optimization: a new dual methods using mixed variables. Int J Numer Methods Eng 23(3):409–428

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu WX (1994) Mechanical optimal design. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haber RB, Jog CS, Bendsøe MP (1996) A new approach to variable-topology shape design using a constraint on perimeter. Struct Optim 11:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Petersson J, Sigmund O (1998) Slope constrained topology optimization. Int J Numer Method Eng 41(8):1417–1434

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Sigmund O, Petersson J (1998) Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: a survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh dependencies and local minima. Struct Optim 16(1):68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou M, Shyy YK, Thomas HL (2001) Checkerboard and minimum member size control in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 21(2):152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Diaz AR, Sigmund O (1995) Checkerboard patterns in layout optimization. Struct Optim 10(1):40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jog CS, Haber RB (1996) Stability of finite element models for distributed parameter optimization and topology design. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 130(3–4):203–226

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingzhou Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuo, KT., Chen, LP., Zhang, YQ. et al. Study of key algorithms in topology optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32, 787–796 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0387-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0387-0

Keywords

Navigation