Skip to main content
Log in

A technique for advanced manufacturing systems capability evaluation and comparison (ACEC)

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a generic technique for the evaluation and comparison of the capability of manufacturing systems as a decision-making aid. It provides a methodical approach for extracting key capability factors (CF) and their degree of fulfilment by the institutes. The capability factors and their priorities are determined by experts in the related industry. By adopting this approach, a “capability index” for each institute will be derived. This will be the basis for capability comparison. The proposed method applies fuzzy relations and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) techniques to calculate capability indices. The case study discussed in this paper is the result of a project commissioned by a prominent UK based company (UBC) to consolidate its EU operations. The results illustrate the effectiveness and flexibility of the proposed methodology for a wide range of applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holt GD (1998) Which contractor selection methodology? Int J Proj Manag 16(3):153–164

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Holt GD, Olomolaiye PO, Harris FC (1995) A review of contractor selection practice in the UK construction industry. Build Environ 30(4):553–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DeMoranville CW, Bienstock CC (2003) Question order effects in measuring service quality. Int J Res Mark 20:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Hagan M (2000) A fuzzy decision maker. Technical report in Fuzzy Logic. (Downloadable from: http://wwwfuzzysys.com/fdmtheor.pdf

  5. Flood RL, Jackson MC (1991) Creative problem solving. Total systems intervention. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–14

  6. Mousavi A, Adl P, Rakowski RT, Gunasekaran A (2001) Design of production planning system using customer oriented design and resource utilisation (CODARU). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(11):805–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ossadnik W, Lange O (1999) Theory and methodology, AHP-based evaluation of AHP-Software. Eur J Oper Res 118:578–588

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Yager RR (1981) A new methodology for ordinal multi-objective decisions based on fuzzy sets. Decis Sci 12(4):589–600

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Yager RR (1988) An order-weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decisions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8(1):183–190

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Bellman R, Zadeh L (1970) Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage Sci 17:141–164

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process, planning, priority setting and resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, pp 1–85

  13. Saaty TL (1997) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure. J Math Psychol 15:234–281

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Keen P, McDonald M (2000) The eProcess edge, creating customer value and business wealth in the Internet era. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 92, 143,144, 161–166, 212–215, 223,224, 138–142, 206–207, 266

  15. Dombi J (1982) A general class of fuzzy operators, the DeMorgan class of fuzzy operators and fuzziness measures induced by fuzzy operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 8:149–163

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Mousavi A, Adl P, Rakowski RT, Gunasekaran A (2001) Customer optimisation route and evaluation (CORE). Int J Comput Integr Manuf 14(2):236–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Woodbridge L, Hayden F, DiRomualdo T (2003) Realising IT contribution to mergers, acquisitions and divestments. Computer Sciences Corporation Research Services, online research services library web site address: http://www.cscresearchservices.com/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mousavi, A., Bahmanyar, M.R., Sarhadi, M. et al. A technique for advanced manufacturing systems capability evaluation and comparison (ACEC). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31, 1044–1048 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0268-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0268-6

Keywords

Navigation