Abstract
This paper proposes a generic technique for the evaluation and comparison of the capability of manufacturing systems as a decision-making aid. It provides a methodical approach for extracting key capability factors (CF) and their degree of fulfilment by the institutes. The capability factors and their priorities are determined by experts in the related industry. By adopting this approach, a “capability index” for each institute will be derived. This will be the basis for capability comparison. The proposed method applies fuzzy relations and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) techniques to calculate capability indices. The case study discussed in this paper is the result of a project commissioned by a prominent UK based company (UBC) to consolidate its EU operations. The results illustrate the effectiveness and flexibility of the proposed methodology for a wide range of applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Holt GD (1998) Which contractor selection methodology? Int J Proj Manag 16(3):153–164
Holt GD, Olomolaiye PO, Harris FC (1995) A review of contractor selection practice in the UK construction industry. Build Environ 30(4):553–561
DeMoranville CW, Bienstock CC (2003) Question order effects in measuring service quality. Int J Res Mark 20:217–231
O’Hagan M (2000) A fuzzy decision maker. Technical report in Fuzzy Logic. (Downloadable from: http://wwwfuzzysys.com/fdmtheor.pdf
Flood RL, Jackson MC (1991) Creative problem solving. Total systems intervention. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–14
Mousavi A, Adl P, Rakowski RT, Gunasekaran A (2001) Design of production planning system using customer oriented design and resource utilisation (CODARU). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17(11):805–809
Ossadnik W, Lange O (1999) Theory and methodology, AHP-based evaluation of AHP-Software. Eur J Oper Res 118:578–588
Yager RR (1981) A new methodology for ordinal multi-objective decisions based on fuzzy sets. Decis Sci 12(4):589–600
Yager RR (1988) An order-weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decisions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8(1):183–190
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353
Bellman R, Zadeh L (1970) Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage Sci 17:141–164
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process, planning, priority setting and resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, pp 1–85
Saaty TL (1997) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure. J Math Psychol 15:234–281
Keen P, McDonald M (2000) The eProcess edge, creating customer value and business wealth in the Internet era. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 92, 143,144, 161–166, 212–215, 223,224, 138–142, 206–207, 266
Dombi J (1982) A general class of fuzzy operators, the DeMorgan class of fuzzy operators and fuzziness measures induced by fuzzy operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 8:149–163
Mousavi A, Adl P, Rakowski RT, Gunasekaran A (2001) Customer optimisation route and evaluation (CORE). Int J Comput Integr Manuf 14(2):236–243
Woodbridge L, Hayden F, DiRomualdo T (2003) Realising IT contribution to mergers, acquisitions and divestments. Computer Sciences Corporation Research Services, online research services library web site address: http://www.cscresearchservices.com/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mousavi, A., Bahmanyar, M.R., Sarhadi, M. et al. A technique for advanced manufacturing systems capability evaluation and comparison (ACEC). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31, 1044–1048 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0268-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0268-6