Skip to main content
Log in

Applying grey model to prioritise technical measures in quality function deployment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The traditional approach to prioritise the technical measures in quality function deployment is to view an entire process as a decision-making problem and to use a one-to-one relationship, a standard series versus a compared series, instead of using a systematic viewpoint to determine the importance of technical measures by assuming the technical measures are independent. In this study, grey model, both GM(1,N) and GM(0,N) models, is applied to determine the priority of technical measures by evaluating the impact of each technical measure in the system. The technical measure with the highest impact in the system is considered to be the most important technical measure. Therefore, technical measures can be prioritised by their respective impacts in the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan LK, Wu ML (2002) Quality function deployment: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 143:463–497

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Akao Y (1994) Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Productivity Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hauser JR, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harvard Business Rev 66(3):63–73

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chan LK, Wu ML (2002–2003) Quality function deployment: a comprehensive review of its concepts and methods. Qual Eng 15(1):23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan LK, Wu ML (1998) Prioritizing the technical measures in quality function deployment. Qual Eng 10(3):467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu H-H (2002) Implementing grey relational analysis in quality function deployment to strengthen multiple attribute decision making processes. J Qual 9(2):19–39

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu H-H (2002–2003) A comparative study of using grey relational analysis in multiple attribute decision making problems. Qual Eng 15(2):209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burke E, Kloeber JM, Deckro RF (2002–2003) Using and abusing QFD scores. Qual Eng 15(1):9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deng J (1982) Control problems of grey systems. Syst Control Lett 5(2):288–294

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deng J (1989) Introduction to grey system. J Grey Syst 1(1):1–24

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin Z-C, Lin WS (2001) The application of grey theory to the prediction of measurement points for circularity geometric tolerance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:348–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin Y-H (2001) Application of smoothing technique on GM(1,1) for forecasting system. Dissertation, Department of Industrial Engineering, Da Yeh University

  13. Kuo T-C, Wu H-H (2001) Using a green quality function deployment to develop green products. Proc International Conference on Production Research, No. 0189

  14. Lin Z-C, Ho C-Y (2003) Analysis and application of grey relation and ANOVA in chemical-mechanical polishing process parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:10–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuo T-C, Wu H-H (2003) Green products development by applying grey relational analysis and green quality function deployment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 5(4):229–238

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wen K-L (2004) The grey system analysis and its application in gas breakdown and VAR compensator finding. Int J Comput Cognit 2(1):21–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsin-Hung Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, HH. Applying grey model to prioritise technical measures in quality function deployment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29, 1278–1283 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0016-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0016-y

Keywords

Navigation