Compensation of distortion in the bottom exposure of stereolithography process

  • You-Min HuangEmail author
  • Hsiang-Yao Lan
Original Article


The rapid prototyping (RP) process is the fastest and most feasible method for prototype construction. However, with the use of any material or build method the phenomenon of volume shrinkage is unavoidable. It is known that volume shrinkage and curl distortion are the major causes that lead to poor accuracy of the built prototype. Subsequently, in order to improve the precision of dimension and volume shrinkage, more expensive equipment is used on the market. Also, it is expensive and inefficient to obtain better process parameters through trail and error in the RP process. In order to improve the precision of dimension, reduce the processing cost and the frequency of trail and error, this study first induces the concept of computer-aided engineering (CAE) into the processing of RP, which uses a dynamic finite element simulation code to simulate the photopolymerization process, so as to reduce the time for selecting the processing parameters and obtain the distortion data. Second, by means of reverse distortion compensation to obtain a new CAD model, then it is sent to a RP machine for the actual prototyping processes, so as to obtain a more accurate precision. Finally, in order to confirm this method and restriction in experimental equipment, the stereolithography process and simple laser scanning path are chosen as examples. The results of the simulation and experiment prove that the method proposed herein is effective. It not only can reduce the cost of equipment but also obtain a better precision of dimension on final-parts at the same time. Besides, it is believed that this research method can be promoted to other materials or build methods in RP fabrication .


Computer-aided engineering Curl distortion  Finite element method Rapid prototyping  Stereolithography 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jacobs P (1992) Rapid prototyping and manufacturing, fundamental of stereolithography, 1st edn. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacobs PF (1992) Rapid prototyping and manufacturing fundamentals of stereolithography. ASME Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chartoff RP, Du J (1995) Photopolymerization reaction rates by reflection real time infrared spectroscopy: application to stereolithography resins. Proc Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Univ of Texas, Austin, TX, pp 298–304Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guess TR, Chambers RS (1995) In Situ property measurement on laser-drawn strands of SL 5170 epoxy and SL 5149 acrylate. Proc Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. Univ of Texas, Austin, TX, pp 134–141Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chambers RS, Guess TR, Hinnerichs TD (1995) A phenomenological finite element model of part building in the Stereolithography process. Proc 6th International Conference on Rapid Prototyping, pp 81–90Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Narahara H et al. (1999) Reaction heat effects on initial linear shrinkage and deformation in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J 5(3):120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bugeda G et al. (1995) Numerical analysis of stereolithography processes using the finite element method. Rapid Prototyp J 1(2):12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tanaka F et al. (2000) Thermal distortion analysis during photopolymerization in stereolithography. The 8th International Conference on Rapid Prototyping, Tokyo, Japan, pp 87–92Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang YM, Jiang CP (2003) Curl distortion analysis during photopolymerization of stereolithography using dynamic finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:586–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang YM, Jiang CP (2003) Numerical analysis of mask type stereolithography process using dynamic finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:649–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hatakeyama T, Quinn FX (1994) Thermal analysis and application to polymer science. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang YM, Jeng JY, Jiang CP, Wang JC (2003) Increased accuracy by using dynamic finite element method in the constrain-surface stereolithography system. J Mater Process Technol 140:191–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Advani S et al. (2001) Simulation of injection molding into rapid prototyped molds. Rapid Prototyp J 7(1):42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations