Abstract
This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nuccio S, Spataro C (2001) Approach to evaluate the virtual instrumentation measurement uncertainties. IEEE Instrumentation Measurement Technology Conference, Budapest, Hungary, 21–23 May 2001
ISO (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Geneva, Switzerland (ISBN 92-67-10188-9)
Ghiani E, Locci N, Muscas C (2001) Auto-evaluation of the uncertainty in virtual instruments. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Anchorage, AK, 2–23 May 2001
Walden RH (1999) Analog-to-digital converter survey and analysis. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 17(4):539–550
Pitas I, Strintzis M (1988) Floating-point error analysis of two dimensional fast Fourier transform algorithms. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 35(1):112–115
Kalliojarvi K, Astola J (1996) Roundoff errors in block-floating-point system. IEEE Trans Signal Process 44(4):783–790
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jing, X., Wang, C., Pu, G. et al. Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27, 1202–1210 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2