Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with measurement uncertainty of virtual instruments (VIs). First the main uncertainty sources of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion and digital signal processing (DSP) are analyzed in detail. Two approaches to evaluate uncertainties of direct and indirect measurements are presented. The first approach deals with measuring an objective variable directly by application of a physical law. Its procedure includes: Step 1: the combined measurement uncertainties of transducer, signal conditioning, A/D conversion, and DSP are estimated respectively according to Type B evaluation of “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” based on Gram-Chariler series. Step 2: their corresponding relative measurement uncertainties are calculated, moreover the overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement is evaluated in rms value. Step 3: the combined uncertainty of the direct measurement is estimated according to the measurement result and the value of overall relative uncertainty of the direct measurement. The second approach involves measurement of an objective variable that is a function of several independent variables; however these variables could be determined by direct respective measurements. The measurement uncertainty of the objective variable could be estimated by applying the “uncertainty propagation law” of GUM. Finally a case study is given to illustrate the application of these approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nuccio S, Spataro C (2001) Approach to evaluate the virtual instrumentation measurement uncertainties. IEEE Instrumentation Measurement Technology Conference, Budapest, Hungary, 21–23 May 2001

  2. ISO (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Geneva, Switzerland (ISBN 92-67-10188-9)

  3. Ghiani E, Locci N, Muscas C (2001) Auto-evaluation of the uncertainty in virtual instruments. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Anchorage, AK, 2–23 May 2001

  4. Walden RH (1999) Analog-to-digital converter survey and analysis. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 17(4):539–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pitas I, Strintzis M (1988) Floating-point error analysis of two dimensional fast Fourier transform algorithms. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 35(1):112–115

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalliojarvi K, Astola J (1996) Roundoff errors in block-floating-point system. IEEE Trans Signal Process 44(4):783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuedong Jing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jing, X., Wang, C., Pu, G. et al. Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27, 1202–1210 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2293-2

Keywords

Navigation