Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation model for the performance of multi-manufacturing time schedule

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The research of Dickson [1] and Weber et al. [2] about the performance evaluation of suppliers pointed out that quality and delivery are two important assessable items. Chen and Yung [3] indicated that the significance of delivery would only increase in the future. Obviously, customers value quality and delivery. Therefore, a superior quality of product and rapid manufacturing process are the major factors in obtaining orders. Much research has been carried out on quality assurance, but the research on delivery is rare. Thus, this paper uses the manufacturing process of optical glass as an example to propose a performance index for a manufacturing time schedule and related a suite of objective evaluation models used. This evaluation method is very convenient and efficient for management to monitor the multi-manufacturing performance of each stage of a manufacturing process for deliveries of high quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dickson GW (1966) An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. J Purchasing 2(1):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weber CA, Current JR, Benton WC (1991) Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur J Oper Res 50:2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen KS, Yung HH (1999) Evaluate supplier delivery performance. J Chin Inst Ind Eng 16(6):681–688

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen KS, Chen SC, Li RK (2002) Process capability analysis of capacitors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:623–628

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18(1):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1988) A new measure of process capability: Cpm. J Qual Technol 20:162–175

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boyles RA (1991) The Taguchi capability index. J Qual Technol 23(1):17–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boyles RA (1994) Process capability with asymmetric tolerances. J Tolerances Commun Stat Simul Comput 23(3):615–643

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson KL (1992) Distribution and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol 24:216–231

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen KS (1998) Incapability index with asymmetric tolerances. Stat Sin 8:253–262

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Vännman K, Delery M (1999) Process capability plots – a quality improvement tool. Qual Reliab Int 15:213–217

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen KS, Pearn WL (2001) Capability indices for processes with asymmetric tolerance. J Chin Inst Eng 24(5):559–568

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen KS, Huang ML, Li RK (2001) Process capability analysis for an entire product. Int J Prod Res 39(17):4077–4087

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen KS, Sung WP, Tsai YY (2002) The evaluation for the performance of supplier. Int J Agile Manuf 5(1):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pearn WL, Chen KS (1997) A practical implementation of the process capability index Cpk. Qual Eng 7(2):721–737

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Pei Sung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, FT., Chen, KS. & Sung, WP. Evaluation model for the performance of multi-manufacturing time schedule. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27, 345–350 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2173-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2173-9

Keywords

Navigation