A method of accumulation and adaptation of design knowledge

  • Heebyung Koh
  • Sungdo HaEmail author
  • Taesoo Kim
  • Soo-Hong Lee
Original Article


Systematic accumulation and various adaptations of knowledge are critical issues in the knowledge management field, where the complexity of dynamic application domains and the uncertainty of future maintainability are main problems. In order to increase the flexibility of the knowledge structure for accumulation and adaptation, a non-hierarchical knowledge structure is needed. A new design knowledge expression method called design DNA is proposed in this study. Design DNA facilitates the rearrangement of design knowledge, promotes the flexibility of knowledge structure, and evolves the creative knowledge from similar design. Design DNA is based on layout-oriented domain knowledge and function-oriented domain knowledge, which enables generating new design knowledge resulting in new part geometries for given constraints on the part functions. Design DNA is applied to the design knowledge of passenger car parts as an example and shows systematic accumulation and various adaptations of design knowledge.


Flexible knowledge Knowledge accumulation  Knowledge adaptability Reusable knowledge 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    West J, Iansiti M (2003) Experience, experimentation, and the accumulation of knowledge: the evolution of R&D in the semiconductor industry. Res Policy 32:809–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cuena J, Molina M (2000) The role of knowledge modelling techniques in software development: a general approach based on a knowledge management tool. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:385–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chu S, Cesnik B (2001) Knowledge representation and retrieval using conceptual graphs and free text document self-organisation techniques. Int J Med Inform 62:121–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dieng R, Corby O, Giboin A (1999) Methods and tools for corporate knowledge management. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:385–421Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turbant E, Aronson JE (2001) Decision support systems and intelligent systems, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tiwana A (2001) The knowledge management toolkit. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kimura F, Kato S, Hata T (2001) Part modularization for parts reuse in inverse manufacturing. Ann CIRP 50(1):89–92Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2000) Product design and development, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Polanyi S (1958) Personal knowledge. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how ese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koh H, Ha S, Kim T, Rho HM, Lee SH (2003) Design knowledge management with reconstructible structure. Ann CIRP 52(1):93–96Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weaver RF (2001) Molecular biology, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heebyung Koh
    • 1
  • Sungdo Ha
    • 2
    Email author
  • Taesoo Kim
    • 2
  • Soo-Hong Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.CAD/CAM Research CenterKorea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)SeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations