Skip to main content
Log in

An iterative coordinate setup algorithm for airfoil blades inspection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The six-point principle was widely used in blade design to provide a reference coordinate for dimensioning. The coordinate setup for CMM inspection was conventionally done manually. It was not only time-consuming, but also inaccurate. We proposed an algorithm for the coordinate setup of airfoil blades inspection. The datum points were divided into five types based on their locations. A specific algorithm was applied to measure each type of the datum points. A procedure based on 3-2-1 method was developed to establish the coordinate system. The coordinate setup process was formulated as an iterative procedure where an error function was derived to evaluate the convergence of the iteration. Experimental results and practical applications were also provided to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menq CH, Hoschek HJ, Yau T, Lai GY (1992) Automated precision measurement of surface profile in CAD-directed inspection. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 8(2):268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong CL, Lin CY, Lai JY (1997) Improvement of a dimensional measurement process using Taguchi robust designs. Qual Eng 9(4):561–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gunnarsson KT, Prinz FB (1987) CAD model-based localization of parts in manufacturing. Computer 20(8):66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sahoo KC, Menq CH (1991) Localization of 3-D objects having complex sculptured surfaces using tactile sensing and surface description. J Eng Ind 113:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang X, Gu P, Zernicke R (1996) Localization and comparison of two free-from surfaces. Comput Aided Des 28(12):1017–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li Z, Gou J, Chu Y (1998) Geometric algorithms for workpiece localization. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 14:864–878

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Masuda T, Yokoya N (1995) A robust method for registration and segmentation of multiple range images. Comput Vis Image Underst 61:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoschek J, Mueller R (2000) Turbine blade design by lofted B-spline surfaces. J Comput Appl Math 119(1):235–248

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ye ZQ (1984) A systematic computational design system for turbine cascades, airfoil geometry, and blade-to-blade analysis. J Eng Gas Turbines Power (Trans ASME) 106:598–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiing-Yih Lai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsu, TH., Lai, JY., Ueng, WD. et al. An iterative coordinate setup algorithm for airfoil blades inspection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26, 797–807 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-2040-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-2040-0

Keywords

Navigation