Skip to main content
Log in

A rough set approach to design concept analysis in a design chain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inherent dynamic relationships among design tasks performed concurrently at different organizations characterize the complexities of a design chain where designers with diverse expertise need to collaborate across organizational boundaries. To ensure timely completion of inter-related design tasks, metrics to facilitate the early evaluation of design concepts are crucial. The ability to evaluate and select suitable design concepts at an early stage will ensure better solutions and greater savings in time and effort further downstream. This paper proposes a new approach based on the rough set theory to design concept analysis. The approach aims at early detection of design inadequacy. A so-called information system is constructed using the information gleaned from design concepts and design capabilities, and analyzed using the rough set theory to derive a set of design rules for design concept analysis. The approach embodies a technique for handling attributes with unavailable information, which is a frequent occurrence in design. This paper presents details of the proposed approach, the novel technique, and a case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khoo LP, Zhai, LY (2001) Multiconcept classification of diagnostic knowledge to manufacturing systems: analysis of incomplete data with continuous-valued attributes. Int J Prod Res 39(17):3941–3957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11:341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Komorowski J, Pawlak Z, Polkowski L, Skowron A (1999) Rough sets: a tutorial. In: Skowron A (ed) Rough Fuzzy Hybridization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3–98

  4. Pawlak Z (1996) Why Rough Sets? In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol 2, New Orleans, LA, pp 738–743

  5. Ulrich KT, Eppinger, SD (2000) Product design and development. Mc-Graw Hill, New York

  6. Hundal MS (1997) Systematical mechanical designing: a cost and management perspective. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kryszkiewicz M (1998) Rough set approach to incomplete information systems. Inf Sci 113:39–49

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhai LY, Khoo LP, Fok SC (2001) Derivation of decision rules for the evaluation of product performance using genetic algorithms and rough set theory. In: Braha D (ed) Data Mining for Design and Manufacturing. Kluwer Academic Publischer, New York, pp 337–353

  9. Kusiak A, Kern JA, Kernstine KH, Tseng, BTL (2000) Autonomous decision-making: a data mining approach. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 4(4):274–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen HP, Le LP, Santiprabhob P, De Baets B (2001) Approach to generating rules for expert systems using rough set theory”, Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Congress, vol 2, Vancouver, Canada, 2 July 2001, pp 877–882

  11. Lee S, Vachtsevanos G (2002) An application of rough set theory to defect detection of automotive glass. Math Comp Simul 60:225–231

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Mollestad T, Komorowski J (1999) A rough set framework for mining propositional default rules. In: Skowron A (ed) Rough fuzzy hybridization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 233–262

  13. Grzymala-Busse JW, Hu M (2000) A comparison of several approaches to missing attribute values in data mining. Second International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, pp 340–347, Banff, Canada, 16–19 October 2000

  14. Kryszkiewicz M (1999) Rules in incomplete information systems. Inf Sci 112:271–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Felix R, Ushio T (1999) Rules induction from inconsistent and incomplete data using rough sets. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol 5, Tokyo, Japan, 12–15 October 1999, pp 154–158

  16. Wang G (2002) Extension of rough set under incomplete information systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Honolulu, HA, vol 2, 12–17 May 2002, pp 1098–1103

  17. Pawlak Z (1998) Granularity of knowledge, indiscernibility and rough sets. In: Proceedings of IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence and IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol 1, Anchorage, AL, 4–9 May 1998, pp 106–110

  18. Liang J, Xu C (2000) Uncertainty measures of roughness of knowledge and rough sets in incomplete information systems. In: Proceedings of third world congress on intelligent control and automation, Hefei, China, 28 June-2 July 2000, pp 2526–2529

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L.P. Khoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alisantoso, D., Khoo, L., Ivan Lee, B. et al. A rough set approach to design concept analysis in a design chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26, 427–435 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-2034-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-2034-y

Keywords

Navigation