Skip to main content
Log in

Minimizing manufacturing costs for thin injection molded plastic components

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimizing the cost of manufacturing a plastic component is very important in the highly competitive plastic injection molding industry. The current approach of R&D work focuses on optimizing the dimensions of the plastic component, particularly in reducing the thickness of the component during product design, the first phase of manufacturing, in order to minimize the manufacturing cost. This approach treats the component dimensions established in the product design phase as the given input, and uses optimization techniques to reduce the manufacturing cost of mold design and molding for producing the component. In most cases, the current approach provides the correct solution for minimizing the manufacturing cost. However, when the approach is applied to a thin component, typically when miniaturizing products, it has problems finding the true minimum manufacturing cost. This paper analyses the shortcomings of the current approach for handling thin plastic components and proposes a method to overcome them. A worked example is used to illustrate the problems and compare the differences when using the current approach and the new method proposed in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menges G, Mohren P (1993) How to make injection molds. Hanser, Munich, pp 89–125

  2. Tan LQ, Pochiraju K, Chassapis C, Manoochehri S (1998) A computer-aided optimization approach for the design of injection mold cooling systems. J Mech Des ASME 120:165–174

    Google Scholar 

  3. He W, Zhang YF, Lee KS, Fun JYH, Nee AYC (1998) Automated process parameter resetting for injection moulding: a fuzzy-neuro approach. J Intell Manuf 9:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao NS, Shumacher G, Ma C (2000) Predicting flow length of spiral melt flows in injection molds by a semi-empirical model. J Inject Mold Technol 4(2):92–96

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lam YC, Sin S (2001) Optimization of gate location for plastic injection molding. J Inject Mold Technol 5(3):180–192

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pandelidis I, Zou Q (1990) Optimization of injection molding design part 1: gate location optimization. Polym Eng Sci 30(15):873–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin JC (2001) Optimum gate design of FreeForm injection mould using the abductive network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park SJ (1998) Thermal and design sensitivity analysis for cooling system of injection mold part I: thermal analysis. J Manuf Sci Eng 120:287–295

    Google Scholar 

  9. Park SJ (1998) Thermal and design sensitivity analysis for cooling system of injection mold part ii: design sensitivity analysis. J Manuf Sci Eng 120:296–306

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee K, Kwak S (1998) Optimal layout and sizing of ejector pins for injection mold design. In: Proceedings of DETC’98 1998 ASME Design Automation Conference, Atlanta, GA, pp 13–16

  11. Shi L, Gupta M (1999) An approximate prediction of sink mark depth in rib-reinforced plastic parts by empirical equations. J Inject Mold Technol 3(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee H-S (1999) In-plane deformation analysis of plastic parts in the injection molding process. J Inject Mold Technol 3(1):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gipson PM, Grelle PF, Salamon BA (1999) The effects of process conditions, nominal wall thickness, and flow length on the shrinkage characteristics of injection molded polypropylene. J Inject Mold Technol 3(3):117–125

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffmann S, Michaeli W (2001) Analysis of the internal structure of injection molded parts based on a three-dimensional simulation software. J Inject Mold Technol 5(2):98–104

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reifschneider LG (2001) Reliability of mold filling simulation for part design. J Inject Mold Technol 5(1):1–48

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pandelidis I, Zou Q (1990) Optimization of injection molding design part II: molding conditions optimization. Polym Eng Sci 30(15):883–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim SJ, Lee K, Kim YI (1996) Optimization of injection molding conditions using genetic algorithm. SPIE 2644:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Helps CRG, Strong AB, Raed A-Z, Hawks VD, Kohkonen KE (1999) The use of artificial neural networks in the prediction of machine operational settings for injection molded parts. J Inject Mold Technol 3(4):201–211

    Google Scholar 

  19. Helps CR, Strong AB, Raed A-Z, Lunt BM, Kohkonen KE (1999) Generalization of a method using neural networks to predict part quality control during injection molding. J Inject Mold Technol 3(4):212–225

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mok SL, Kwong CK, Lau WS (2001) A hybrid neural network and genetic algorithm approach to the determination of initial process parameters for injection moulding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18:404–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Belofsky H (1995) Plastics: Product design and process engineering. Hanser, Munich

  22. Rao NS (1991) Design formulas for plastics engineers. Hanser, Munich

  23. Johannaber F (1994) Injection molding machines – a user’s guide, 3rd Edn. Hanser, Munich, pp 260–272

  24. Tan KH (1997) Determination of injection molding processing parameters for defect-free parts. Dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.K.L. Ho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ho, J., Chu, K. & Mok, C. Minimizing manufacturing costs for thin injection molded plastic components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26, 517–526 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-2023-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-2023-1

Keywords

Navigation