Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization of continuous-time production planning using hybrid genetic algorithms-simulated annealing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms are stochastic search methods that mimic the principles of natural biological evolution to produce better and better approximations to a solution and have been used widely for optimization problems. A general problem of continuous-time aggregate production planning for a given total number of changes in production rate over the total planning horizon is considered. It is very important to identify and solve the problem of continuous-time production planning horizon with varying production rates over the interval of the planning period horizon. Some of the researchers have proposed global search methods for the continuous-time aggregate production-planning problem. So far, less work is reported to solve the problem of continuous-time production planning using local search methods like genetic algorithms (GA) and simulated annealing (SA). So in this work, we propose a modified single objective evolutionary program approach, namely GA, SA, and hybrid genetic algorithms-simulated annealing (GA-SA) for continuous-time production plan problems. The results are compared with each other and it was found that the hybrid algorithm performs better.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aghezzaf EH, Artiba A (1998) Aggregate planning in hybrid flowshops. Int J Prod Res 36(9):2463–2477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Federgruen A, Schechner Z (1983) Cost formulas for continuous review inventory models with fixed delivery lags. Oper Res 31(6):957–965

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fogel DB (1994) An introduction to simulated evolutionary optimization. IEEE Trans Neural Net 5(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Publication Co., New York

  5. Harlan CM (1984) Putting production decisions where they belong. Harvard Bus Rev 62(2):102–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kogen K, Khmelnitsky E, Maimon O (1998) Balancing facilities in aggregate production planning: make to order and make to stock environments. Int J of Prod Res 36(9):2585–2596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Konstantin K, Khmelnitsky E (1995) An optimal control method for aggregate production planning in large scale manufacturing systems with capacity expansion and deterioration. Comp Industr Eng (4):851–859

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dervitsiotis KN Production and operations management. Tata McGraw Hill, New Dheli

  9. Lee J, Johnson GE (1993) Optimal tolerance allotment using a genetic algorithm and truncated Monte Carlo simulation. Comp-Aided Des 25(9):601–611

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu L (1990) (s, S) continuous review models for inventory with random life-times. Oper Res Lett 12(3):161–167

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Luss H (1982) Operations research and capacity expansion problems: a survey. Oper Res 30(5):904–947

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher ML, Hammond JH, Obermeyer WR, Raman A (1994) Making supply meet demand in an uncertain world. Harvard Bus Rev 7(3):84

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gen M, Liu B (1995) Evolution program for production plan problem. Engineering Design and Automation 1(3):199–204

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michalewicz Z (1992) Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  15. Moinzadeh K, Nahmias S (1988) A continuous review model for an inventory system with two supply modes. Manage Sci 34(5):761–773

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quennichie J, Bactor FF, Martel A (1999) The impact of sequencing decisions on multi item lot sizing and scheduling in flow shops. Int J Prod Res 37(10):2253–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stockton DJ, Quinn L (1995) Aggregate production planning using genetic algorithnms. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part, J Eng Manuf 209(B3):201–209

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang RC, Fang HH (2001) Aggregate production planning with multiple objective in a fuzzy environment. Eur J Oper Res 133:521–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang D, Fang SC (1997) A genetics-based approach for aggregated production planning in a fuzzy environment. IEEE Trans Syst Manual, Cybernetics, Part A: Syst Humans 27:636–645

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang PP, Wilson GR, Odrey NG (1994) An on-line controller for production system with seasonal demands. Comp Ind Eng 27:565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weinstein L, Chung CH (1999) Integrating maintenance and production decisions in a hierarchical production planning environment. Comp Oper Res 26:1059–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Ganesh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganesh, K., Punniyamoorthy, M. Optimization of continuous-time production planning using hybrid genetic algorithms-simulated annealing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26, 148–154 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1976-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1976-4

Keywords

Navigation