Abstract
Process capability indices have been widely used by quality professionals for measuring process performance. Although process yield is the most common criterion used in the manufacturing industry for measuring process performance, a more advanced measurement formula Yq, called quality yield index, has been proposed as an alternative measure of process performance. Quality yield can be viewed as the classical process yield minus the truncated expected relative process loss, within the specifications, which focuses on customer satisfaction. By taking customer loss into consideration, the advantage of using the quality-yield measure as process performance is that the formula can be applied to processes with arbitrary distributions. Unfortunately, statistical properties of the estimated Yq are mathematically intractable. Therefore, capability testing cannot be performed. In this paper, a nonparametric but computer intensive method called bootstrap is used to obtain a lower confidence bound on quality yield for capability testing purposes. Simulation studies are conducted to examine the sampling distribution of the estimated Yq. An application using the index Yq for the light emitting diode manufacturing process is presented for illustration purposes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18(1):41–52
Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1988) A new measure of process capability: Cpm. J Qual Technol 20(3):162–175
Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL (1992) Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol 24:216–231
Ng KK, Tsui KL (1992) Expressing variability and yield with focus on the customer. Qual Eng 5:255–267
Johnson T (1992) The relationship of Cpm to squared error loss. J Qual Technol 24:211–215
Pearn WL, Chang YC, Wu CW (2004) A quality-yield measure for production processes with very low fraction defective. Int J Prod Res (in press)
Somerville SE, Montgomery DC (1996) Process capability indices and non-normal distributions. Qual Eng 9:305–316
Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1–26
Efron B (1982) The Jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA
Efron B (1981) Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals. Can J Stat 9:139–172
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1986) Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence interval, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1:54–77
Franklin LA, Wasserman GS (1992) Bootstrap lower confidence limits for capability indices. J Qual Technol 24(4):196–210
Chou YM, Owen DB, Borrego AS (1990) Lower confidence limits on process capability indices. J Qual Technol 22:223–229
Bissell AF (1990) How reliable is your capability index? Appl Stat 39(3)331–340
Boyles RA (1991) The Taguchi capability index. J Qual Technol 23:17–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pearn, W., Chang, Y. & Wu, CW. Bootstrap approach for estimating process quality yield with application to light emitting diodes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25, 560–570 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1879-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1879-4