Skip to main content
Log in

Procedures for testing manufacturing precision Cpbased on (\(\bar{x}\),R) or (\(\bar{x}\),S) control chart samples

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process precision index Cp has been widely used in the manufacturing industry for measuring process potential and precision. Estimating and testing process precision based on one single sample have been investigated extensively. In this paper, we consider the problem of estimating and testing process precision based on multiple samples taken from (\(\bar{x}\),R)or (\(\bar{x}\),S)control chart. We first investigate the statistical properties of the natural estimator of Cp and implement the hypothesis testing procedure. We then develop efficient MAPLE programs to calculate the lower confidence bounds, critical values, and p-values based on m samples of size n. Based on the test, we develop a step-by-step procedure for practitioners to use in determining whether their manufacturing processes are capable of reproducing products satisfying the preset precision requirement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kane, VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rado LE (1989) Enhance product development by using capability indexes. Qual Prog 22(4):38–41

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pearn WL, Lin GH, Chen KS (1998) Distributional and inferential properties of the process accuracy and process precision indices. Commun Stat: Theory & Methods 27(4): 985–1000

    Google Scholar 

  4. Montgomery DC (1985) Introduction to statistical quality Control. Wiley, New York

  5. Kirmani SNUA, Kocherlakota K, Kocherlakota S (1991) Estimation of σ and the process capability index based on subsamples. Commun Stat: Theory & Methods 20:275–291

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pearn WL, Yang YS (2003) Distributional and inferential properties of the estimated precision index Cp based on multiple samples. Qual Quant 37:443–453

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pearson ES (1932) The percentage limits for the distribution of range in samples from a normal population. Biometrika 24: 404–417

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patnaik PB (1950) The use of mean range as an estimator of variance in statistical tests. Biometrika 37:78–87

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kocherlakota S (1992) Process capability index: recent developments. Sankhya Indian J Stat 54:352–369

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kotz S, Lovelace, CR (eds)(1998) Process capability indices in theory and practice. Arnold, London

  11. Chou YM, Owen DB, Borrego SA (1990) Lower confidence limits on process capability indices. J Qual Technol 22:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li H, Owen DB, Borrego SA (1990) Lower confidence limits on process capability indices based on the range. Commun Stat: Simul and Comput 19(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W.L. Pearn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearn, W., Wu, CW. & Chuang, H. Procedures for testing manufacturing precision Cpbased on (\(\bar{x}\),R) or (\(\bar{x}\),S) control chart samples. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25, 598–607 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1870-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1870-0

Keywords

Navigation