Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling the effect of flank wear on machining thrust stability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses an analytical assessment of the effect of cutting tool flank wear on machining stability along the thrust direction in a turning operation based on an analysis of frequency band root-mean-square (RMS) level of the accelerometer signals. The energy content of machining at the tool-tip/workpiece interface along the flank is represented by the RMS signal level, in comparison to the random vibration of the cantilever portion of the tool holder. The RMS signals measured from a tool-post accelerometer in stable machining with tool wear effect are calculated using the frequency band RMS method at the first natural frequency of the cantilever portion of the tool holder. Increasing flank wear results in increasing stability and decreasing RMS in the thrust direction in machining. For model validation, a series of machining experiments were performed under the condition of various flank wear/land widths, while the RMS signals from a tool-post accelerometer were collected and studied. It was found that theoretical predictions were shown to be in agreement with experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

c :

Viscous damping constant

c′ :

Effective damping constant, c +k c T+k f

F w :

Contact force in the x direction

f 1 :

Lower frequency of band pass filter

f 2 :

Higher frequency of band pass filter

G x (f):

One-sided power spectral density function of the signal x(t)

H(w):

Complex frequency response function

k′ :

k m

k m :

Spring constant

k c :

Cutting coefficient

k f :

Penetration rate constant

k sp :

Specific contact force

l w :

Tool wear width

ψ(x):

Variation of chip thickness in the direction normal to the primary cutting edge, ψ(x)=[x(t−T)−x(t)]

m :

Mass

m′ :

Effective mass, \(m - k_{c} \frac{{T^{2} }} {2}\)

n(t):

Random force

n′(t):

Random acceleration

p(x):

Power spectral density function

S (w):

Mean square spectral density

S o :

Spectral density

T :

Delay time (1/spindle speed)

T p :

Time period

t :

Time

V :

total volume of displaced material

v :

cutting speed

W oc :

Width of cut

w :

frequency, rad/s

w oc :

Width of cut

w n :

Natural frequency, (k′/m′)1/2

ζ :

Damping ratio, c′/2m’w n

x :

Displacement of the mass

\( \ifmmode\expandafter\bar\else\expandafter\=\fi{x} \) :

Mean

\( \dot{x} \) :

Velocity

\(\ifmmode\expandafter\ddot\else\expandafter\"\fi{x}\) :

Acceleration

σ :

Standard deviation

References

  1. Dan L, Matthew J (1990) Tool wear and failure monitoring techniques for turning—a review. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 30(4):579–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang SY, Dornfeld DA (1989) Tool wear detection using time series analysis of acoustic emission. ASME J Eng Ind 111:199–205

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pandit SM, Subramanian TL, Wu SM (1975) Modeling machine tool chatter by time series. ASME J Eng Ind 97b:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pandit SM, Subramanian TL, Wu SM (1975) Stability of random vibrations with special reference to machine tool chatter. ASME J Eng Ind 97b:216–219

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caughey TK, Stumpf HJ (1961) Transient response of a dynamic system under random excitation. J App Mech 28:563–566

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chiou YS, Chung ES, Liang SY (1995) Analysis of tool wear effect on chatter stability in turning. Int J Mech Sci 37(4):391–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ismail F, Elbestawi MA, Du R, Urbasik K (1993) Generation of milled surfaces including tool dynamics and wear. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 115:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cook NH (1959) Self-excited vibrations in metal cutting. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 81:183–186

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marui E, Ema S, Kato S, Chatter vibration of lathe tools, part 1: general characteristics of chatter vibration, part 2: on the mechanism of energy supply. ASME J Eng Ind 105:100–113

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold RN (1946) The mechanism of tool vibration in the cutting of steel. Inst Mech Eng J Proc 154:261–284

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tlusty J (1978) Analysis of the state of research in cutting dynamics. CIRP Ann 27(2):583–589

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw MC, DeSalvo GJ (1970) On the plastic flow beneath a blunt axis symmetric indenter. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 92:480–487

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu DW (1988) Application of a comprehensive dynamic cutting force model to orthogonal wave-generating processes. Int J Mech Sci 30(8):581–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshitaka K, Osamu K, Hisayoshi S (1981) Behavior of self-excited chatter due to multiple regenerative effect. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 103:324–329

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roth T, Pandit M (1998) Monitoring end-mill wear and predicting tool failure using accelerometers. Proceedings of the ASME, MED 8:867–875

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang CY, Zhang YZ, Xu HJ (1987) In-process monitoring of tool wear stage by the frequency band-energy method. CIRP Ann 36(1):45–48

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chung ES, Chiou YS, Liang SY (1993) Tool wear and chatter detection in turning via time series modeling and frequency band averaging. In: Proceedings of symposium on intelligent design and manufacturing, ASME winter annual meeting, pp 351–358

  18. Koren Y, Danai K, Ulsoy AG, Ko TR (1987) Monitoring tool wear through force measurement. In: 15th proceedings of the North American manufacturing research conference, pp 463–468

  19. Micheletti GF, Koenig W, Victor HR (1976) In-process tool wear sensors for cutting operations. CIRP Ann 25:483–496

    Google Scholar 

  20. Park JJ, Ulsoy AG (1993) On-line flank wear estimation using an adaptive observer and computer vision, part 1, 2. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 115:30–36

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ulsoy AG, Danai K (1987) A dynamic state model for on-line tool wear estimation in turning. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 109:396–399

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taglia D, Portunato A, Toni P (1976) An approach to on-line measurement of tool wear by spectrum analysis. In: proceedings of machine tool design and research conference 17:141–148

  23. Wallace PW, Andrew C (1965) Machining forces: some effects of tool vibration. J Mech Eng Sci 7(2):152–162

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rao SB (1986) Tool wear monitoring through the dynamics of stable turning: Trans ASME J Eng Ind 108:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martin P, Mutel B, Drapier JP (1974) Influence of lathe tool wear on the vibrations sustained in cutting. In: Proceedings of MTDR 15:251–257

  26. Sisson TR, Kegg RL (1969) An explanation of low speed chatter effects. Trans ASME 91(4):951–958

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wirsching PH, Paez TL, Ortiz K (1995) Random vibrations: theory and practice. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang GM, Kapoor SG (1991) Dynamic generation of machined surfaces, part 1: description of a random excitation system. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 113:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang GM, Kapoor SG (1991) Dynamic generation of machined surfaces, part 2: construction of surface topography. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 113:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sankar TS (1975) A reliability estimate for machine tool spindles subjected to random forces. Mech Mach Theory 10:131–138

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Y. Liang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, S.Y., Kwon, Y.K. & Chiou, R.Y. Modelling the effect of flank wear on machining thrust stability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23, 857–864 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1756-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1756-1

Keywords

Navigation