Abstract
The aim of this paper is the formulation and numerical solution for finding the maximum dynamic load of mobile manipulators for a given two-end-point task. In fixed-base classical robots, the maximum allowable load is limited mainly by their joint actuator capacity constraints. However, besides actuator capacity constraints, kinematic redundancy and non-holonomic constraints should be considered for finding maximum dynamic payload of mobile manipulators, both of which arise from base mobility. The extended Jacobian matrix concept is used to solve the redundancy resolution and non-holonomic constraints. The problem is formulated as a trajectory optimisation problem, which fundamentally is a constrained nonlinear optimisation problem. Then, the iterative linear programming (ILP) method is utilised to solve the optimisation problem. Finally, by a numerical example involving a two-link manipulator mounted on a differentially driven wheeled base, use of the method is presented and the results are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Seraji H (1998) A unified approach to motion control of mobile manipulators. Int J Robot Res 17(12):107–118
Yamamato Y, Yun S (1994) Modeling and compensation of the dynamic interaction of mobile manipulator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 2184–2192
Wang LT, Ravani B (1988) Dynamic load carrying capacity of mechanical manipulators: I. Problem formulation. J Dyn Sys Meas Control 110:46–52
Wang LT, Ravani B (1988) Dynamic load carrying capacity of mechanical manipulators: II. Computational procedure and applications. J Dyn Sys Meas Control 110:53–61
Korayem MH, Basu A (1994) Dynamic load carrying capacity for robotic manipulators with joint elasticity imposing accuracy constraints. Robot Auton Sys 13:219–229
Korayem MH, Basu A (1994) Formulation and numerical solution of elastic robot dynamic motion with maximum load carrying capacity. Robotica 12:253–261
Yue S, Tso SK, Xu WL (2001) Maximum dynamic payload trajectory for flexible robot manipulators with kinematic redundancy. Mech Mach Theory 36:785–800
Korayem MH, Ghariblu H (2003) The effect of base replacement on dynamic load carrying capacity of robotic manipulators. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23(1):28–38
Carriker WF et al (1992) The use of simulated annealing to solve the mobile manipulator path planning problem. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 204–209
Papadopoulos EG, Ray DR (1996) A new measure of tip over stability margin for mobile manipulators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 3111–3116
Ghasempoor A, Sepehri N (1995) A measure of stability for mobile based manipulators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 2249–2254
Rey DA, Papadopoulos EG (1997) Online automatic tip-over prevention for mobile and redundant manipulators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS’97), pp 1273–1278
Huang Q et al (2000) Coordinated motion planning for a mobile manipulator considering stability and manipulation. Int J Robot Res 19(8):732–742
Ghariblu H, Korayem MH (2000) Mathematical analysis of kinematic redundancy and constraints on robotic mobile manipulators. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on applied mathematics, pp 502–511
Chung JH, Velinsky SA (1998) Modeling and control of mobile manipulators. J Robot 16:607–613
Chung JH, Velinsky SA, Hess RH (1998) Interaction control of a redundant mobile manipulator. Int J Robot Res 17(12):1302–1309
Chung PH et al (2000) An extension to operational space for kinematically redundant manipulators: kinematics and dynamics. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 16(5):592–596
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korayem, M., Ghariblu, H. & Basu, A. Maximum allowable load of mobile manipulators for two given end points of end effector. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24, 743–751 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1748-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1748-1