Abstract
The coordinate measuring machine (CMM) has been recognized as a powerful tool for dimensional and geometric tolerance inspection in the manufacturing industry. The power of the CMM depends heavily on an efficient inspection plan that measures a part in minimal time. This paper proposes CMM inspection planning that can minimize the number of part setups and probe orientations and the inspection feature sequence. In our planning, a greedy heuristic method is adopted to obtain the minimal number of part setups and probe changes. Meanwhile, a continuous Hopfield neural network is developed to solve the inspection feature-sequencing problem. The proposed method was successfully implemented and tested using a machine spindle cover part. The results show that the proposed method can achieve excellent performance compared to the other methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schaffer (1982) Taking the measure of CMMs. Am Mach 145–160
Wang N, Ozsoy TM (1991) A scheme to represent features, dimensions, and tolerances in geometric modeling. J Manuf Syst 10:233–240
ElMaraghy HA, Gu P (1987) Expert system for inspection process planning. Annals CIRP 36:85–89
Menq CH, Yau HT, Wong CL (1992) An intelligent planning environment for automated dimensional inspection using coordinate measuring machines. Trans ASME 144:222–230
Merat FL, Radack GM (1992) Automatic inspection planning within a feature-based cad system. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 9:61–69
Roy U, Xu Y, Wang L (1994) Development of an intelligent inspection planning system in an object oriented programming environment. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 7:240–246
Gu P, Chan K (1995) An integrated object-oriented product modeling and inspection planning system. J Design Manuf 5:127–141
Lin Z-C, Chen C-C (1997) Measuring-sequence planning by the nearest neighbor method and the refinement method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13:271–281
Ziemian CW, Medeiros DJ (1998) Automating probe selection and part setup planning for inspection on a coordinate measuring machine. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 11:448–460
Fan K-C, Leu MC (1998) Intelligent planning of CAD-directed inspection for coordinate measuring machines. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 11:43–51
Kweon S, Medeiros DJ (1998) Part orientations for CMM inspection using dimensioned visibility maps. CAD 30:741–749
Lin Z-C, Chow J-J (2001) Near optimal measuring sequence planning and collision-free path planning with a dynamic programming method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18:29–43
Beg J, Shunmugam MS (2002) An object oriented planner for inspection of prismatic parts—OOPIPP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:905–916
Aho AV, Hopcroft JE, Ullman JD (1972) The design and analysis of computer algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Chvátal V (1979) A greedy heuristic for the set-covering problem. Math Oper Res 5:233–235
Corman TH, Leiserson CE, Rivest RL (1989) Introduction to Algorithms. MIT, Cambridge 974–978
Hopfield JJ, Tank DW (1985) Neural computation of decision in optimization problems. Biol Cybern 52:141–152
Abe S, Kawakami J, Hirasawa K (1992) Solving inequality constrained combinatorial optimization problems by the Hopfield neural networks. Neural Netw 5:663–670
Wilson GV, Pawley GS (1988) On the stability of the traveling salesman problem algorithm of Hopfield and Tank. Biol Cybern 58:63–70
Takefuji Y (1992) Neural network parallel computing. Kluwer, Boston
Corrigall MJ, Bell R (1991) Probe and component set-up planning for coordinate measuring machines. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 4:34–44
Aiyer SVB, Niranjan M, Fallside F (1990) A theoretical investigation into the performance of the Hopfield model. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1:204–215
Kamger-Parsi B, Kamger-Parsi B (1992) Hopfield and optimization problems. In: Neural networks perception-computation, learning, and architectures. Academic Press, San Diego
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, CY., Tsai, CY. & Chang, C.A. Efficient inspection planning for coordinate measuring machines. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23, 732–742 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1642-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1642-x