Skip to main content
Log in

Geometric modeling of single point cutting tool surfaces

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we have established a new three-dimensional standard to specify single point cutting tool geometry. The paper models a single point cutting tool in terms of biparametric surface patches. Six new angles, called grinding angles, are proposed to define the orientation of these surface patches. Forward and inverse mappings among grinding angles (α i , β i , γ i ), conventional tool nomenclature (γ y, γ x, α y, α x , ..... ), and setting or swivel angles for grinding (θ A , θ B , θ C ) are established. The benefits of the new paradigm include ease of finite element based engineering analysis, simulation, and programming of the CNC tool cutter and grinder for tool sharpening. The proposed methodology is illustrated with a few numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6a,b.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

R :

Rotation matrix

T :

Translation matrix

d ij :

Displacement of i th plane in j th direction

n f :

Vector normal to rake face

n p :

Vector normal to principal flank

q ax , q ay , q az :

Transformed coordinates of any point on auxiliary flank

q px , q py , q pz :

Transformed coordinates of any point on principal flank

q rx , q ry , q rz :

Transformed coordinates of any point on rake face

q sx , q sy , q sz :

Transformed coordinates of any point on shoulder face

r:

Nose radius

u, v, w :

Parametric coefficients

α 1 :

Grinding angle for auxiliary flank about the x axis

α 2 :

Grinding angle for principal flank about the x axis

α 3 :

Grinding angle for rake face about the x axis

α n :

Normal clearance angle on the principal flank

α1 :

Normal clearance angle on the auxiliary flank

α o :

Orthogonal clearance angle on the principal flank

αo :

Orthogonal clearance angle on the auxiliary flank

α x :

Side clearance angle on the principal flank

α y :

End clearance angle on the principal flank

α'x :

Side clearance angle on the auxiliary flank

α'y :

End clearance angle on the auxiliary flank

β 1 :

Grinding angle for auxiliary flank about the y axis

β 2 :

Grinding angle for principal flank about the y axis

β 1 * :

Actual angle of the secondary cutting edge measured from the wire frame model

β 2 * :

Actual angle of the principal cutting edge measured from the wire frame model

γ 3 :

Grinding angle for rake face about the z axis

γ n :

Normal rake angle

γ o :

Orthogonal rake angle

γ x :

Side rake angle

γ y :

Back rake angle

λ :

Inclination angle

λ e :

Inclination angle of auxiliary cutting edge

θ :

Tool setting angle on a tool cutter and grinder

φ :

Principal cutting edge angle

φ e :

End cutting edge angle

φ s :

Side cutting edge angle

References

  1. Bhattacharya A (1998) Metal cutting: theory and practice. New Central Book Agency, Calcutta, pp 33–105

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rodin P (1968) Design and production of metal cutting tools. Mir Publishers, Moscow, pp 34–46

  3. Popov S, Dibner L, Kamenkovich A (1988) Sharpening of cutting tools. Mir Publishers, Moscow, pp 156–205

  4. Dallas DB (1976) Tool and manufacturing engineers handbook. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, New York

  5. Wilson FW (1987) ASTME: fundamentals of tool design. Prentice Hall, NJ

  6. Mortenson ME (1985) Geometric modeling. Wiley, New York, pp 30–371

  7. Rogers DF, Adams JA (1990) Mathematical elements of computer graphics. McGraw Hill, Singapore, pp 101–206

  8. Choi BK (1991) Surface modeling for CAD/CAM. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 95–126

  9. Sheth DS, Malkin S (1990) CAD/CAM for geometry and process analysis of helical groove machining. Annals of CIRP, 39(1):129–132

  10. Kaldor S, Moore K, Hodgson T (1983) Drill point design by computers. Ann CIRP, 32(1):27–30

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang GC, Fuh KH, Yan BH (2001) A new mathematical model for multifaceted drills derived by using angle-solid models. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(1):103–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsai WD, Wu SM (1979) Computer analysis of drill point geometry. Int J Mach Tool Des Res 19(2):95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsai WD, Wu SM (1979) A mathematical model for drill point design and grinding. T ASME, J Eng Ind 101(3):333–340

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin C, Kang SK, Ehmann KF (1995) Helical micro-drill point design and grinding. T ASME, J Eng Ind 117(4):277–287

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fujii S, DeVries MF, Wu SM (1972) Analysis and design of a drill grinder and evaluation of the grinding parameters. T ASME, J Eng Ind 94(4):1157–1163

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ehmann KF (1990) Grinding wheel profile definition for the manufacture of drill flutes. Ann CIRP 39(1):153–156

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bhattacharya A, Chaterjee AB, Mullick BK (1973) Geometry and performance of multi-cone and curved-lip twist drills. Ann CIRP 22(1):27–28

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shi HM, Zhang HS, Xiong LS (1994) A study of curved edge drill. T ASME, J Eng Ind116:267–273

  19. Mounayri HE, Spence AD, Elbestawi MA (1998) Milling process simulation — a generic solid modeler based paradigm. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 120(2):213–221

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ekambaram B, Malkin S (1993) CAD software for helical flute grinding of milling cutters. T NAMRI/SME XXI:181–188

  21. Battle JA, Foix SC, Sanz CV (1985) On the design of milling cutters or grinding wheels for twist drill manufacture, a CAD approach. Proceedings of the 25th International MTDR Conference, pp 315-320

  22. Ko SL (1994) Geometric analysis of helical flute grinding and application to end mill. T NAMRI/SME XXII:165–172

  23. Altintas Y, Lee P (1996) A general mechanics and dynamics model for helical end mills. Ann CIRP 45(1):59–64

    Google Scholar 

  24. Altintas Y, Lee P (1998) Mechanics and dynamics of ball end milling. T ASME, J Manuf Sci Eng 120(4):684–692

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yucesan G, Altintas Y (1996) Prediction of ball end milling forces. T ASME, J Eng Ind 118(1):95–103

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rajpathak TS (1996) Geometric modeling of single point cutting tools for grinding and sharpening. M Tech Thesis, IIT Kanpur

  27. Deo YV (1997) Geometric modeling of single point and fluted tool surfaces. M Tech Thesis, IIT Kanpur

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors are thankful to the Department of Science & Technology (DST), Government of India for sponsoring a project to work on modeling of cutting tools. The authors further wish to acknowledge the work done by Mr. Tushar Rajpathak and Mr. Yogesh Deo in particular, as well as all the engineers and staff of CAD-P Laboratory, IIT Kanpur for helping in one way or another.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tandon, P., Gupta, P. & Dhande, S.G. Geometric modeling of single point cutting tool surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22, 101–111 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-002-1447-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-002-1447-3

Keywords

Navigation