Localization of collaborations in knowledge creation
- 153 Downloads
This study investigates the localization of collaboration in knowledge creation by using data on Japanese patent applications. Applying distance-based methods, we obtained the following results. First, collaborations are significantly localized at the 5% level with a localization range of approximately 100 km. Second, the localization of collaboration is observed in most technologies. Third, the extent of localization was stable from 1986 to 2005 despite extensive developments in information and communications technology that facilitate communication between remote organizations. Fourth, the extent of localization is substantially greater in inter-firm collaborations than in intra-firm collaborations. Furthermore, in inter-firm collaborations, the extent of localization is greater in collaborations with small firms. This result suggests that geographic proximity mitigates the firm-border effects on collaborations, especially for small firms.
JEL ClassificationR12 O31
This study is conducted as a part of the Project “Inter-organizational and Inter-inventors Geographical Proximity and Networks” undertaken at Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI). We thank two anonymous referees for their useful suggestions that significantly improved the paper. We thank Victor Couture, Jonathan Dingel, Gilles Duranton, Tatsuaki Kuroda, Yasusada Murata, Sadao Nagaoka, Ryosuke Okamoto, Yukako Ono, and the participants at the UEA in Ottawa, the ARSC at Toyama University, and at seminars at Fukuoka University, Hitotsubashi University, Kobe University, Nihon University, RIETI, Temple University, and the University of Tokyo for their helpful comments. We also thank the Center for Spatial Information Science, University of Tokyo, for providing us with geocoding services. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Nos. 15K01217, 16H02018, 16K13367, 17H02508, 17H02514, 17H02517, 17H02518, 18H00859, and 18K04615). We gratefully acknowledge NIRA for providing funding and setting up interviews with patent-publishing companies.
- Akcigit U, Caicedo S, Miguelez E, Santcheva S, Sterzi V (2018) Dancing with the stars: innovation through interactions. NBER Working paper, No. 24466Google Scholar
- Cairncross F (2001) The death of distance: how the communications revolution is changing our lives. Harvard Business Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Huo D, Motohashi K (2015) Understanding two types of technological diversity and their effects on the technological value of outcomes from bilateral inter-firm R&D alliances. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 15-E-06Google Scholar
- Inoue H, Nakajima K, Saito YU (2015) Innovation and collaboration patterns between research establishments. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 15-E-049Google Scholar
- Japan Patent Office (2014) Japan Patent Office Annual Report 2014, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Japan Patent Office (2017) Comparative Research on the Patent Systems of Japan, the United States and Europe, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2008) Compendium of Patent Statistics. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Saito YU, Yamauchi I (2015) Inventors’ mobility and organizations’ productivity: evidence from Japanese rare name inventors. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 15-E-128Google Scholar
- Saxenian A (1994) Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki J (2011) The structural characteristics of research and development by Japanese companies, and issues for the future. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 11-J-002Google Scholar