Advertisement

The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 231–254 | Cite as

Computable urban economic model incorporated with economies of scale for urban agglomeration simulation

  • Runsen ZhangEmail author
  • Kakuya Matsushima
  • Kiyoshi Kobayashi
Original Paper

Abstract

Urban agglomeration has attracted attentions of urban planners, economists, and policymakers. For the sake of urban agglomeration simulation, this paper attempts to develop a computable urban economic (CUE) model incorporated with economies of scale, through the approach of new economic geography. It is assumed that each firm produces a product variant in a monopolistic competition market, and the number of firms is explicit and determined endogenously. The Dixit–Stiglitz type utility function with product variety is adopted into the households’ behavior to reflect consumers’ preference for variety. On the other hand, internal increasing returns to scale and fixed cost are introduced in firms’ behavior to extend the model with economies of scale. The model’s parameter estimations and calibration are conducted on the basis of empirical data from several approved sources for Changzhou in 2008. Numerical computations are implemented by employing the extended CUE model incorporated with economies of scale to explain and examine how the urban agglomeration comes into being. Simulation results show that the extended model incorporated with economies of scale is able to commendably represent the urban agglomeration mechanism, providing a promising simulation tool for urban planning and policymaking.

JEL Classification

R10 R13 O18 

References

  1. Abdel-Rahman HM (1988) Product differentiation, monopolistic competition and city size. Reg Sci Urban Econ 18:69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anas A, Kim I (1996) General equilibrium models of polycentric urban land use with endogenous congestion and job agglomeration. J Urban Econ 40:232–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anas A, Liu Y (2007) A regional economy, land use, and transportation model (RELU-TRAN): formulation, algorithm design, and testing. J Reg Sci 47:415–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anas A, Xu R (1999) Congestion, land use, and job dispersion: a general equilibrium model. J Urban Econ 45:451–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Changzhou Bureau of Land and Resources (CBLR) (2008) Changzhou Benchmark Land Price. Changzhou, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  6. Changzhou Planning Bureau (CPB) (2008) Changzhou Person Trip Survey. Changzhou, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  7. Changzhou Statistical Bureau (CSB) (2009) Changzhou StatisticalYearbook. Changzhou, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  8. Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67:297–308Google Scholar
  9. Fujita M (1988) A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomeration. Reg Sci Urban Econ 18:87–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glazer A, Gradstein M, Ranjan P (2003) Consumption variety and urban agglomeration. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33:653–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krugman PR (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lowry IS (1964) A model of metropolis. RM-4035-RC. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
  13. Quigley JM (1998) Urban diversity and economic growth. J Econ Perspect 12:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tabuchi T (1998) Urban agglomeration and dispersion: a synthesis of Alonso and Krugman. J Urban Econ 44:333–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Takagi A, Muto S, Ueda T (1999) The benefit evaluation of urban transportation improvements with computable urban economic model. In: 99th Shanghai international symposium on urban transportation proceedings, 18–20 Nov 1999. Tongji University Press, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  16. Ueda T, Hiratani K, Tsutsumi M (1993) Land use model based on the general equilibrium of land and building markets. In: Proceedings of international conference on land problem and urban policy, 19–22 Aug 1993, Kyoto, JapanGoogle Scholar
  17. Ueda T, Tsutsumi M, Muto S, Yamasaki K (2013) Unified computable urban economic model. Ann Reg Sci 50:341–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. United Nations (2014) World urbanization prospects. Technical report, UN, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Yamasaki K, Ueda T, Muto S (2007) The evaluation of the tokyo-metropolitan area policy by computable urban economic model (CUE). In: Selected proceedings of the 11th world conference on transport research (CD-ROM, No. 734), 24–28 June 2007. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang R, Matsushima K, Kobayashi K (2016) Land use, transport, and carbon emission: a computable urban economic model for Changzhou, China. Rev Urban Reg Dev Stud 28:162–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Runsen Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Kakuya Matsushima
    • 1
  • Kiyoshi Kobayashi
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.National Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations