Skip to main content
Log in

Two traditional questions on the relationships between telecommuting, job and residential location, and household travel: revisited using a path analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to provide empirical evidence for two traditional research questions in the field of telecommuting studies: (1) Does telecommuting promotes dispersion of urban space? (2) Does telecommuting substitute for household travel? Although these causality issues have received great deal of attention, no multivariate analysis approaches exist. Using the 2006 household travel survey data from the Seoul Metropolitan Area, this study adopts a path analysis to discover the complex relationships between telecommuting, residential/job locations, and household travel. First, the path analysis shows that rather than telecommuting serving as the determinant of location choice, job locations determine the choice to telecommute. Hence, secondary impacts of telecommuting on travel may not occur with location changes as the medium. Second, the analysis also shows that the household head’s telecommuting has a positive influence on his/her non-commuting travel in both the person kilometers traveled (PKT) and vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) models and on household members’ travel in VKT models. Moreover, the VKT model suggests that the household head’s non-commuting travel has a negative impact on the household members’ travel. These results indicate that although telecommuting reduces commute travel, this may be offset by other travel demand within the household, owing to exhaustion of the limited travel budget. Thus, planners and policymakers must consider these impacts when evaluating the benefits and costs of telecommuting as an urban management policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These papers are based on the same survey data and geographical boundaries with this paper. But, the specific data set and methodologies applied are different from one another according to their different research questions.

  2. We also tested simpler models that excluded the travel variables, but we decided to apply the current structure as the models were saturated.

  3. Due to analytical errors, we did not considered reciprocal paths in Sect. 4. However, such analytical errors were not found in Sect. 5.

  4. We also analyzed this alternative model, but its goodness of fit was found to be remarkably lower than that of the other models.

  5. Household members’ travel variable is not divided by the number of household members in order to reconcile one unit of the two travel-related endogenous variables.

  6. The full results of the RHMs are available from authors upon request.

  7. In Sect. 5, the travel-related variables were rescaled in 10 km units for minimizing iterations (Muthén and Muthén 2007).

  8. The empirical setting of this paper focuses on the intra-household interactions in travel rather than overall impact of telecommuting. To draw a more precise estimate of the overall impact, household-level analyses should be performed (Kim et al. 2015). Because this approach needs comprehensive changes in the empirical setting, this issue will be addressed through future research.

References

  • Alonso W (1964) Location and land use: toward a general theory of land rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cao X (2006) The causal relationship between the built environment and personal travel choice: evidence from Northern California. Dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Davis

  • De Graaff T (2004) On the substitution and complementarity between telework and travel: a review and application. http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/1871/8927/1/20040016.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2011

  • Demographia (2012) Demographia world urban areas (built-up urban areas or world agglomerations) 10th annual edition. http://www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf. Accessed 24 November 2014

  • Ellen IG, Hempstead K (2002) Telecommuting and the demand for urban living: a preliminary look at white-collar workers. Urban Stud 39:749–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M (1989) Urban economic theory: land use and city size. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garreau J (1991) Edge city: life on the new Frontier. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glogger AF, Zängler TW, Karg G (2008) The impact of telecommuting on households’ travel behaviour, expenditures and emissions. In: Jensen-Butler C, Sloth B, Larsen MM et al (eds) Road pricing, the economy and the environment. Springer, Berlin, pp 411–425

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Golob TF (1996) A model of household demand for activity participation and mobility. University of California, Irvine

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham S (1997) Telecommunications and the future of cities: debunking the myths. Cities 14:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer R, Kroes E, Vanooststroom H (1991) Teleworking in the Netherlands: an evaluation of changes in travel behavior. Transportation 18:365–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen WG (1959) How accessibility shapes land use. J Am Inst Plan 25:73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helminen V, Ristimaki M (2007) Relationships between commuting distance, frequency and telework in Finland. J Transp Geogr 15:331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson P, James, P, Maruyama T (2002) Teleworking AT BT—the economic, environmental and social impacts of its workabout scheme http://www.slideshare.net/KennyBHS/teleworking-at-bt. Accessed 13 June 2011

  • James P (2004) Is teleworking sustainable? An analysis of its economic, environmental and social impacts. European Communities, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Janelle DG (1995) Metropolitan expansion, telecommuting, and transportation. In: Hanson S, Giuliano G (eds) The geography of urban transportation, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 407–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim H (2009) Effects of compact city planning elements on travel behavior of different income levels. Dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University (in Korean)

  • Kim S-N, Ahn K (2010) Estimating the travel-related impacts of home-based telecommuting. J Korea Plan Assoc 45:147–164 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-N, Ahn K (2011) The relationships between home-based telecommuting and residential location. J Korea Plan Assoc 46:37–55 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-N, Mokhtarian PL, Ahn K (2012) The Seoul of Alonso: new perspectives on telecommuting and residential location from South Korea. Urban Geogr 33:1163–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-N, Choo S, Mokhtarian P (2015) Home-based telecommuting and intra-household interactions in work and non-work travel: a seemingly unrelated censored regression approach. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 80:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig BE, Henderson DK, Mokhtarian PL (1996) The travel and emissions impacts of telecommuting for the State of California Telecommuting Pilot Project. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 4:13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang R (2003) Edgeless cities: Exploring the elusive metropolis. Brookings Institution Press, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Lari A (2012) Telework/Workforce Flexibility to Reduce Congestion and Environmental Degradation? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 48:712–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Lim J (2008) Structural Equation Modeling and AMOS 7. Bupmoonsa, Paju (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund JR, Mokhtarian PL (1994) Telecommuting and residential location: theory and implications for commute travel in monocentric metropolis. Transp Res Rec 1463:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan M (1967) The city has no existence beyond being a cultural ghost for tourists. http://shirleyshor.com/text/city_of_bits.htm. Accessed 29 April 2010

  • McLuhan M (1995) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Routledge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WJ (1995) City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WJ (1999) E-topia: Urban life, Jim - but not as we know it. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian PL (1991) Telecommuting and travel: state of the practice, state of the art. Transportation 18:319–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian PL (1998) A synthetic approach to estimating the impacts of telecommuting on travel. Urban Studies 35:215–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian PL, Collantes GO, Gertz C (2004) Telecommuting, residential location, and commute-distance traveled: Evidence from State of California employees. Environment and Planning A 36:1877–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian PL, Handy SL, Salomon I (1995) Methodological Issues in the Estimation of the Travel, Energy, and Air-Quality Impacts of Telecommuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 29:283–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon S (2009) Basic Concepts and Applications of Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS 17. Hakjisa, Seoul [in Korean]

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos M, Skaburskis A (2007) The characteristics and location of home workers in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. Urban Studies 44:1781–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos M, Skaburskis A (2010) Workplace restructuring and urban form: the changing national settlement patterns of the Canadian workforce. Journal of Urban Affairs 32:25–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad S, Ottens HFL, Ettema D et al (2007) Telecommuting and residential locational preferences: A case study of the Netherlands. J Housing Built Environ 22:339–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2007) Mplus User‘s Guide, 5th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles

  • Nagurney A, Dong J, Mokhtarian PL (2003) A space-time network for telecommuting versus commuting decision-making. Papers in Regional Science 82:451–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilles J (1991) Telecommuting and urban sprawl: mitigator or inciter? Transportation 18:411–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilles J (1996) What does telework really do to us? World Transport Policy and Practice 2:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ory DT, Mokhtarian PL (2006) Which came first, the telecommuting or the residential relocation? An empirical analysis of causality. Urban Geography 27:590–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendyala RM, Goulias KG, Kitamura R (1991) Impact of telecommuting on spatial and temporal patterns of household travel. Transportation 18:383–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee H (2009) Telecommuting and urban sprawl. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 14:453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon I (1986) Telecommunications and travel relationships: A review. Transportation Research Part A: General 20:223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sener IN, Bhat CR (2011) A copula-based sample selection model of telecommuting choice and frequency. Environment and Planning A 43:126–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Q (2000) New telecommunications and residential location flexibility. Environment and Planning A 32:1445–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang W, Mokhtarian PL, Handy SL (2008) The role of neighborhood characteristics in the adoption and frequency of working at home: empirical evidence from Northern California.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/13x2q3rb;jsessionid=845EA468EDB1D949EC5508A331385C83. Accessed 28 February 2011

  • Tayyaran M, Khan A (2007) Telecommuting and residential location decisions: Combined stated and revealed preferences model. Can J Civ Eng 34:1324–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ommeren J, Rietveld P, Nijkamp P (2000) Job mobility, residential mobility and commuting: A theoretical analysis using search theory. The Annals of Regional Science 34:213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber MM (1968) The post-city age. Daedalus 97:1091–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfle LM (2003) The introduction of path analysis to the social sciences, and some emergent themes: an annotated bibliography. Struct Equa Model Multidiscip J 10:1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou LR, Su Q, Winters PL (2009) Telecommuting as a component of commute trip reduction program trend and determinants analyses. Transp Res Rec 2135:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P (2012) Are telecommuting and personal travel complements or substitutes? Ann Region Sci 48:619–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P (2013) Telecommuting, household commute and location choice. Urban Stud 50:2441–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The comments of the anonymous reviewers have substantially improved this paper. I would like to express our deepest thanks to them. This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012R1A1A2009216), and also partially supported by the Architecture and Urban Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Nam Kim.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (docx 66 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, SN. Two traditional questions on the relationships between telecommuting, job and residential location, and household travel: revisited using a path analysis. Ann Reg Sci 56, 537–563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0755-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0755-8

JEL Classification

Navigation