The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 153–176 | Cite as

Economic impact assessment of alternative European Neighborhood Policy (ENP) options with the application of the GMR-Turkey model

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper applies the GMR-Turkey policy impact model to estimate the likely regional effects of a selected set of policies suggested in the European Neighborhood Policy literature. We grouped the policy suggestions into two alternative sets of measures, which became the bases of two alternative scenarios of regional economic development, the Conservative scenario and the Technology- and innovation-based development scenario. Our results suggest that a persistent and systematic long-term regional technology development-based economic policy which applies measures such as investment, education and R&D support, promotion of better connectedness to EU research networks and increased physical accessibility to developed markets could in the longer run result in higher levels of regional and national production together with decreasing interregional differences than a scenario supporting the expansion of traditional industries in the region.

JEL Classification

O31 H41 O40 

References

  1. Akçomak S, Müller-Zick H (2013) Trust and innovation in Europe: causal, spatial and non-linear forces: STPS-Science and Technology Policy Studies Center, Middle East Technical UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Anagnostou A, Kallioras D, Petrakos G (2013) Integrating the neighbors: a dynamic panel analysis of EU–ENP trade relations. SEARCH working paper WP 2/11. September 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/SEARCH_Working-Paper_2.11.pdf
  3. Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42(3):422–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Autant-Bernard C, Chalaye S (2013) Knowledge diffusion between European Neighboring Countries and the European Union. SEARCH working paper WP4/13. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WP-4.13.pdf
  5. Autant-Bernard C, Guironnet J-P, Massard N (2013) Determinants of innovation diffusion in the EU: a microeconometric analysis of firms’ innovation adoption choices. SEARCH working paper 4/9. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/WP-4.9.pdf
  6. Bartlett W (2013) Skill mismatch, education systems, and labour markets in EU Neighbourhood Policy countries. SEARCH working paper WP5/20. September 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/WP05.20.pdf
  7. Bartlett W, Cuckovic N, Jurlin K, Nojkovic A, Popovski V (2013) Institutional quality and growth in EU Neighbourhood Countries. SEARCH working paper WP 5/11. January 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WP-5.11.pdf
  8. Bayar A (2007) Simulation of R&D investment scenarios and calibration of the impact on a set of multi-country modelsGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergman E, Sinozic T (2014) Final policy guide: towards an evidence-based ENP. May 2014. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/SEARCH-Deliv-6.-5_Policy-Guide_Final_DEF.pdf
  10. Boschma R, Capone G (2013) Mind your step: the heterogeneous effect of relatedness and diversification process in EU and ENP countries. SEARCH working paper WP 2/9. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/SEARCH_Working-Paper_2.09.pdf
  11. Brandsma A, Kancs A (2015) RHOMOLO: a dynamic general equilibrium modelling approach to the evaluation of the European Union’s R&D policies. Reg Stud 49:1340–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Capello R (2007) A forecasting territorial model of regional growth: the MASST model. Ann Reg Sci 41:753–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Di Guardo MC, Paci R (2013) Firms transactions and knowledge flows in the European Union’s Neighboring Countries. SEARCH working paper 4/23. September 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/WP4.23.pdf
  14. Erdil E, Pamukcu T (2013) Institutional environment, economic performance and innovation in Turkey. SEARCH working paper WP5/17. June 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/WP05.17.pdf
  15. ESRI (2002) An examination of the ex-post macroeconomic impacts of CSF 1994–1999 on objective 1 countries and regionsGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission (2003) The wider Europe Neighbourhood, a new framework for relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours, European Commission (COM 104 final). http://eeas.europa.eu/enp/pdf/pdf/com03_104_en.pdf
  17. Favale M, Borghi M (2013) Harmonization of intellectual property rights within and beyond the European Union: the acquis communautaire in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy. SEARCH working paper WP 5/25. September 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/WP05.25.pdf
  18. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A (1999) The spatial economy. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Kallioras D, Petrakos G (2013) The determinants of trade activity among the EU and the ENP countries. SEARCH working paper WP2/8. September 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/SEARCH_Working-Paper_2.08.pdf
  20. Kifle T (2007) Do remittances encourage investment in education? Evidence from Eritrea. GEFAME J Afr Stud 4:1–9. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.4761563.0004.101
  21. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lebedeva N, Schmidt P (2013) Values and attitudes towards innovation among Canadian, Chinese and Russian students. Working paper 5/8 January 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WP-5.8.pdf
  23. Liargovas P (2013) Do Business incubators and technoparks affect regional development? A comparative study in the EU27 and the NC16 countries. SEARCH working paper 4/5. January 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WP-4.5.pdf
  24. LSE (2011) Study on the impact of the single market on cohesion: implications for cohesion policy, growth and competitiveness. Final report. European Commission, Directorate-General Regional Policy, Directorate Policy Development, CCI: 2010CE16BAT006Google Scholar
  25. Marrocu E, Paci R, Usai S (2013) Knowledge production function and proximities. Evidence from spatial regression models for the European regions. SEARCH working paper WP 4/1. January 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WP-4.1.pdf
  26. Matano A, Ramos R (2013) Remittances and educational outcomes: evidence for Moldova. SEARCH working paper WP3/10. April 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SEARCH-WP-3.10.pdf
  27. Miguélez E, Moreno R (2013a) Knowledge creation in Europe along time: indirect impact of high-skilled workers mobility and research networks. SEARCH working paper WP3/14. May 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/WP_3.14.pdf
  28. Miguélez E, Moreno R (2013b) Research networks and inventors’ mobility as drivers of innovation: evidence from Europe. SEARCH working paper 3/13. May 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/WP_3.13.pdf
  29. Miguélez E, Moreno R (2013c) The determinants of inventors’ interregional mobility between EU regions. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/WP_3.16.pdf
  30. Monastiriotis V, Borrel M (2013) Origin of FDI and domestic productivity spillovers: does European FDI have a ’productivity advantage’ in the ENP countries?’. SEARCH working paper WP2/13. September 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/SEARCH_Working-Paper_2.13.pdf
  31. Ondos S, Bergman E (2013a) European integration as policy metaphor for future EU–EN knowledge sharing. SEARCH working paper 4/11. January 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WP-4.11.pdf
  32. Ondos S, Bergman E (2013b) Emerging knowledge networks: EU–ENC patent citation links. SEARCH working paper 4/20. September 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/WP4.20.pdf
  33. ORAN (2013) 2014–2020 regional development plan of TR72 region, Mid-Anatolian Development Agency – ORANGoogle Scholar
  34. Parts E (2013) The dynamics and determinants of social capital Eve Parts in the European Union and Neighbouring Countries. SEARCH working paper WP 5/1. January 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WP-5.1.pdf
  35. Pikalova A, Mazurin A (2013) Analysis of knowledge diffusion and EU-Neighbouring Countries research networks based on the outcomes of interviews with INCO projects consortium members. SEARCH working paper WP4/14. January 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/WP-4.14.pdf
  36. Pinna AM (2013) Is the EU the best trade partner for its neighbors? SEARCH working paper WP2/2. January 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WP-2.2.pdf
  37. Ratto M, Roeger W, in’t Veld J (2009) QUEST III: an estimated open-economy DSGE model of the euro area with fiscal and monetary policy. Econ Model 26(1):222–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scherngell T, Barber MJ (2009) Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme*. Pap Reg Sci 88(3):531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scherngell T, Barber MJ (2009) Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme*. Pap Reg Sci 88(3):531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sebestyén T, Varga A (2013) Research productivity and the quality of interregional knowledge networks. Ann Reg Sci 155–189. doi:10.1007/s00168-012-0545-x
  41. Varga A (2007) GMR-Hungary: a complex macro-regional model for the analysis of development policy impacts on the Hungarian economy. PTE KTK KRTI working papers (2007/4)Google Scholar
  42. Varga A (2015) Place-based, spatially blind, or both? Challenges in estimating the impacts of modern development policies: the case of the GMR policy impact modeling approach. Int Reg Sci Rev. doi:10.1177/0160017615571587
  43. Varga A (2000) Local academic knowledge transfers and the concentration of economic activity. J Reg Sci 40(2):289–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Varga A (2006) The spatial dimension of innovation and growth: empirical research methodology and policy analysis. Eur Plan Stud 14(9):1171–1186. doi:10.1080/09654310600933298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Varga A, Pontikakis D, Chorafakis G (2014) Metropolitan Edison and cosmopolitan Pasteur? Agglomeration and interregional research network effects on European R&D productivity. J Econ Geogr 14:229–263. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Varga A, Járosi P, Sebestyén T (2011) Modeling the economic impacts of regional R&D subsidies: the GMR-Europe model and its application for EU Framework Program policy impact simulations. In: Paper presented at the 6th international seminar on regional innovation policies. University of Lund, Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  47. Varga A, Járosi P, Sebestyén T, Baypinar M (2013) Detailed policy impact model. Report of the SEARCH FP7 Project. November 2013Google Scholar
  48. Varga A, Járosi P, Sebestyén T, Szerb L (2015) Extension and application of the GMR-Eurozone model towards the CEE regions for impact assessment of smart specialisation policies. GRINCOH FP6 Project reportGoogle Scholar
  49. Wanzenböck I, Scherngell T, Brenner T (2014) Embeddedness of regions in European knowledge networks: a comparative analysis of inter-regional R&D collaborations, co-patents and co-publications. Ann Reg Sci 53(2):337–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wesselink E, Boschma R (2012) Overview of the European Neighbourhood Policy: its history, structure, and implemented policy measures. SEARCH working paper WP1/4. January 2012. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/WP-1.4.pdf
  51. Yalciner UG, Durukan C, Ertan A (2013) Legal framework for intangible assets in Turkey. SEARCH working paper WP 5/26. June 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/WP05.26.pdf
  52. Yeldan AE, Taşçı K, Voyvoda E, Özsan ME (2013) Bölgesel Kalkınma ve İkili Tuzaktan Çıkış Stratejileri Orta Gelir Tuzağı’ndan Çıkış: Hangi Türkiye? (vol 2): TURKONFEDGoogle Scholar
  53. Zvirgzde D, Schiller D, Diez JR (2013) The role of local institutional environment for the development of multinationals and SMEs in Ukraine: transition economies perspective. SEARCH working paper 5/19, June 2013. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/WP05.19.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Econometrics, Faculty of Business and EconomicsUniversity of PécsPécsHungary
  2. 2.MTA-PTE Innovation and Economic Growth Research Group, Faculty of Business and EconomicsUniversity of PécsPécsHungary
  3. 3.Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Regional Planning Division, Faculty of ArchitectureIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations