Does absorptive capacity determine collaboration returns to innovation? A geographical dimension
- 226 Downloads
This paper aims to estimate the impact of collaboration in innovation activities with partners in different geographical areas on innovative performance. By using the Spanish Technological Innovation Panel, this study provides evidence that the benefits of collaboration differ across different dimensions of the geography. We find that the impact of extra-European cooperation on innovation performance is larger than that of national and European cooperation, indicating that firms tend to benefit more from interaction with international collaborators as a way to access new technologies or specialized and novel knowledge that they are unable to find locally. We also find evidence of the positive role played by absorptive capacity, concluding that it implies a higher premium on the innovation returns to cooperation in the international case and mainly in the European one.
JEL ClassificationL25 O31 O33 R1
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, ECO2011-30260-C03-03. Erika Badillo wishes to acknowledge the financial support from the AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya) through “the grant for universities and research centres for the recruitment of new research personnel (FI-DGR 2011)”. Rosina Moreno acknowledges financial support from Ayudas Fundación BBVA and the Program ICREA Acadèmia.
- Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1988) Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. Am Econ Rev 78:678–690Google Scholar
- Arvanitis S, Lokshin B, Mohnen P, Wörter M (2013) Impact of external knowledge acquisition strategies on innovation: a comparative study based on Dutch and Swiss panel data. UNU-MERIT Working Papers 2013-003, pp 1–26Google Scholar
- Cincera M, Kempen L, van Pottelsberghe B, Veugelers R, Villegas C (2003) Productivity growth, R&D and the role of international collaborative agreements: some evidence for Belgian manufacturing companies. Bruss Econ Rev 46(3):107–140Google Scholar
- European Commission (2012) Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations (RIS 3). Smart Specialization PlatformGoogle Scholar
- Ghemawat P (2001) Distance still matters: the hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Bus Rev 79(8):137–147Google Scholar
- Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2005) Oslo manual, guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation, 3rd edn. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 3rd edn. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Zahra S, George G (2002) Absorptive capability: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):185–203Google Scholar