The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 1–27 | Cite as

Agglomeration and regional growth policy: externalities versus comparative advantages

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper explores the existence of different types of static and dynamic externalities and shows the relationship between externalities, interregional trade, and cluster policy. By guiding policy in choosing the most appropriate strategy for facing some frequent dilemmas, this paper has clear implications in regional development policy and adds to the existent literature in three ways. First, it contributes to a better characterization of dynamic externalities by extending the “advantages of backwardness” approach, formerly developed to explain the catching-up of national economies, to the regional context. Second, the paper presents a new model that relates static and dynamic externalities to the clustering mode of production in the regional context. Third, the paper contributes to give a more accurate theoretic basis to the regional cluster policy and to help policy-makers in choosing the right policy for increasing the well-being of depressed regions. The major conclusion is that policy must pursue a combination of the comparative advantage principle with one type of dynamic externalities uncovered in this paper: the “related variety benefits” of agglomeration.

JEL Classification

O25 O33 O41 R12 R13 R58 

References

  1. Abramovitz M (1979) rapid growth potential and its realisation: the experience of capitalist economics in the post-war period. In: Malinvaud E (ed) Economic growth and resources: vol I: The major issues. Macmillan, London, pp 1–30Google Scholar
  2. Abramovitz M (1986) Catching-up, forging ahead and falling behind. J Econ Hist 46(2):386–406Google Scholar
  3. Abramovitz M, David P (1995) Convergence and deferred catch-up productivity leadership and the waning of American exceptionalism. In: Landau R, Taylor T, Wright G (eds) Growth and development: the economics of the 21st century. Stanford CA, Stanford UPGoogle Scholar
  4. Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manag Sci 45:905–917Google Scholar
  5. Arrow K (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29:155–173Google Scholar
  6. Asheim B, Gertler M (2005) The geography of innovation. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) (2006) The Oxford handbook of innovation, Chap. 11, pp 291–317Google Scholar
  7. Bailly A (1998) The region: a basic concept for understanding local areas and global systems, Cybergeo. Eur J Geogr. doi:10.4000/cybergeo.333
  8. Baptista R, Swann P (1998) Do firms in clusters innovate more? Res Policy 27:525–540Google Scholar
  9. Barro R (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. J Polit Econ 98(5):S103–S125Google Scholar
  10. Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100:223–251Google Scholar
  11. Bathelt H, Schuldt N (2010) International trade fairs and global buzz, part I: ecology of global buzz. Eur Plan Stud 18:1957–1974Google Scholar
  12. Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28:31–56Google Scholar
  13. Beaudry C, Schiffauerova A (2009) Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Res Policy 38:318–337Google Scholar
  14. Benneworth P, Danson M, Raines P, Whittam G (2003) Confusing clusters: making sense of the cluster approach in theory and practice. Eur Plan Stud 11(5):511–520Google Scholar
  15. Boschma R (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39(1):61–74Google Scholar
  16. Boschma R (2009) Evolutionary economic geography and its implications for regional innovation policy. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Boschma R, Frenken K (2011) The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. J Econ Geogr 11(2):295–307Google Scholar
  18. Boschma R, Wenting R (2007) The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry. Does location matter? Ind Corp Change 16(2):213–238Google Scholar
  19. Brachert M, Titze M, Kubis A (2011) Identifying industrial clusters from a multidimensional perspective: methodical aspects with an application to Germany. Pap Reg Sci 90(2):419–440Google Scholar
  20. Braun E, MacDonald S (1978) Revolution in miniature: the history and impact of semiconductor electronics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Brenner T, Mühlig A (2007) Factors and mechanisms causing the emergence of local industrial clusters—a meta-study of 159 cases. Papers on Economics & Evolution No 0723. Max Planck Institute of Economics, JenaGoogle Scholar
  22. Camagni R (1991) Local ‘milieu’, uncertainty and innovation networks: towards a new dynamic theory of economic space. In: Camagni R (ed) Innovation networks: spatial perspectives. Belhaven Press, London, pp 121–144Google Scholar
  23. Ciccone A (2002) Agglomeration effects in Europe. Eur Econ Rev 46:213–227Google Scholar
  24. Ciccone A, Hall R (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 86(1):54–70Google Scholar
  25. Corden M (1997) Trade policy and economic welfare, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Coe D, Helpman E (1995) International R&D spillovers. Eur Econ Rev 39(5):859–887Google Scholar
  27. Coe D, Helpman E, Hoffmaister A (1997) North-South R&D spillovers. Econ J 107:134–149Google Scholar
  28. Cohen MD, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity. A new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152Google Scholar
  29. Cooke P (2001) Clusters as key determinants of economic growth: the example of biotechnology. In: Mariussen A (ed) Cluster policies —cluster development? Nordregio Report 2001/2. StockholmGoogle Scholar
  30. Cooke P (2002) Knowledge economies: clusters, learning and cooperative advantage. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Cooper D (2001) Innovation and reciprocal externalities: information transmission via job mobility. J Econ Behav Org 45(4):403–425Google Scholar
  32. David P, Rosenbloom J (1990) Marshallian factor market externalities and the dynamics of industrial location. J Urban Econ 28:349–370Google Scholar
  33. de Groot H, Poot J, Smit M (2008) Agglomeration externalities, innovation and regional growth: theoretical perspectives and meta-analysis. Department of Economics Working Paper Series, No 1/08. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of WaikatoGoogle Scholar
  34. DeLong B, Summers L (1991) Equipment investment and economic growth. Q J Econ 106(2):445–502Google Scholar
  35. Duranton G (2011) California Dreamin’: the feeble case for cluster policies. Rev Econ Anal 3(1):3–45Google Scholar
  36. Duranton G, Puga D (2001) Nursery cities: urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1454–1477Google Scholar
  37. Enright M (1996) Regional clusters and economic development: A research agenda. In: Staber U, Schaefer NV, Sharma B (eds) Business networks: prospects for regional development. De Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. European Commission (2008) The concept of clusters and cluster policies and their role for competitiveness and innovation: main statistical results and lessons learned, Commission Staff Working Document No. SEC 2637, Europe INNOVA/PRO INNO Europe Paper No. 9. European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  39. Fagerberg J (1987) A technology gap approach to why growth rates differ. Res Policy 16:87–89Google Scholar
  40. Fagerberg J, Verspagen B (2002) Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion and transformation: an evolutionary interpretation. Res Policy 31:1291–1304Google Scholar
  41. Feldman M (2000) Location and innovation: the new economic geography of innovation, spillovers, and agglomeration. In: Clark GL, Feldman M, Gertler M (eds) Oxford handbook of economic geography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 373–394Google Scholar
  42. Feldman M, Audretsch D (1999) Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):409–429Google Scholar
  43. Freeman T (1961) A hundred years of geography. Gerald Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Frenken K, Van Oort F, Verburg T (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Reg Stud 41(5):685–697Google Scholar
  45. Fujita M (1988) A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomeration: a differentiated product approach. Reg Sci Urban Econ 18:87–124Google Scholar
  46. Fujita M, Thisse J-F (2002) Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Gertler M (2003) Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). J Econ Geogr 3(1):75–99Google Scholar
  48. Glaeser E, Gottlieb J (2009) The wealth of cities: agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. J Econ Lit 47:983–1028Google Scholar
  49. Glaeser E, Maré D (2001) Cities and skills. J Lab Econ 19(2):316–342Google Scholar
  50. Glaeser E, Kallal H, Scheinkman J, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100(6):1126–1152Google Scholar
  51. Goldstein GS, Gronberg TJ (1984) Economies of scope and economies of agglomeration. J urban Econ 16:91–104Google Scholar
  52. Gordon IR, McCann P (2000) Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Stud 37(3):513–532Google Scholar
  53. Grabher G (1993) The weakness of strong ties: the ‘lock-in’ of regional development in the Ruhr area. In: Grabher G (ed) The embedded firm: on the socio-economics of industrial networks. Routledge, London, pp 255–277Google Scholar
  54. Harrison B, Kelley M, Gant J (1996) Specialization versus diversity in local economies: the implications for innovative private-sector behavior. Cityscape: J Policy Dev Res 2:61–93Google Scholar
  55. Henderson V, Kuncoro A, Turner M (1995) Industrial development in cities. J Polit Econ 103:1067–1085Google Scholar
  56. Henning M, Moodysson J, Nilsson M (2010) Innovation and regional transformation: from clusters to new combinations. Region Skåne, MalmöGoogle Scholar
  57. Hospers G-J, Sautet F, Desrochers P (2008) Silicon somewhere: Is there a need for cluster policy? In: Karlsson C (ed) (2008b) Handbook of research on innovation and cluster: cases and policies, chap. 24, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  58. Isaksen A (1997) Regional clusters and competitiveness: the Norwegian case. Eur Plan Stud 5:65–76Google Scholar
  59. Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Jacobs J (1984) Cities and the wealth of nations: principles of economic life. Vintage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108(3):577–598Google Scholar
  62. Johansson B (2005) Parsing the menagerie of agglomeration and network externalities. In: Karlsson C, Johansson B, Stough R (eds) Industrial clusters and inter-firm networks, chapter 5. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  63. Johansson B, Karlsson C, Stough R (eds) (2001) Theories of endogenous regional growth: lessons for regional policies. Advances in spatial science. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  64. Karlsson C (ed) (2008a) Handbook of research on cluster theory (handbooks of research on clusters series, 1) Ed Elgar Publishing Limited, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  65. Karlsson C (ed) (2008b) Handbook of research on innovation and cluster: cases and policies (Handbooks of research on clusters series, 2) Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  66. Keeble D, Wilkinson F (eds) (2000) High-technology clusters. Networking and collective learning in Europe, Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  67. Ketelhöhn N (2006) The role of clusters as sources of dynamic externalities in the US semiconductor industry. J Econ Geogr 6(5):679–699Google Scholar
  68. King C, Silk A, Ketelhöhn N (2003) Knowledge spillovers and the growth in the disagglomeration of the US advertising-agency industry. J Econ Manag Strateg 12:327–362Google Scholar
  69. Krugman P (1991a) Geography and trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Krugman PR (1991b) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499Google Scholar
  71. Krugman P (2011) The new economic geography, now middle-aged. Reg Stud 45:1–7Google Scholar
  72. Leslie S (2000) The biggest “Angel” of them all: the military and the making of Silicon Valley. In: Kenney M (ed) Understanding Silicon Valley: the anatomy of an entrepreneurial region. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 48–67Google Scholar
  73. Lucas RE Jr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monetary Econ 22(1):3–42Google Scholar
  74. Macher J, Mowery D, Hodges D (1998) Reversal of fortune? The recovery of the US semiconductor industry. Calif Manag Rev 41:107–136Google Scholar
  75. Maggioni M (2002) Clustering dynamics and the location of high-tech-firms (contributions to economics). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  76. Malmberg A, Maskell P (2002) The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environ Plan A 34(3):429–449Google Scholar
  77. Malmberg A, Maskell P (2006) Localized learning revisited. Growth Change 37(1):1–18Google Scholar
  78. Malmberg A, Power D (2005) (How) do (Firms in) clusters create knowledge? Ind Innov 12:409–431Google Scholar
  79. Markusen A (1996) Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts. Econ Geogr 72(3):293–313Google Scholar
  80. Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics, 8th edn. Macmillan, London. Original work published 1890Google Scholar
  81. Martin R, Sunley P (2003) Deconstructing Clusters: chaotic concept or policy Panacea? J Econ Geogr 3(1):5–35Google Scholar
  82. Maskell P, Kebir L (2006) What qualifies a cluster theory? In: Asheim B, Cooke P, Martin R (eds) Clusters and regional development. Critical reflections and explorations. Routledge, New York, pp 30–49Google Scholar
  83. Maskell P, Malmberg A (1999) Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Camb J Econ 23(2):167–185Google Scholar
  84. Maskell P, Eskelinen H, Hannibalsson I, Malmberg A, Vatne E (1998) Competitiveness, localised learning and regional development. Specialisation and prosperity in small open economies. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  85. McCann P (2008) Agglomeration economics. In: Karlsson C (ed) Handbook of research on cluster theory. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp 23–38Google Scholar
  86. Morgan K (2004) The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. J Econ Geogr 4:3–21Google Scholar
  87. Morris P (1990) A history of the world’s semiconductor industry. Peter Peregrinus Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  88. Murphy KM, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1989) Industrialization and the big push. J Polit Econ 97(5):1003–1026Google Scholar
  89. Neffke F, Henning M (2009) Skill-relatedness and firm diversification. Papers on Economics and Evolution 2009–06. Evolutionary Economics Group, revised, Max Planck Institute of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  90. Neffke F, Henning M, Boschma R (2008) Surviving in agglomerations: plant evolution and the changing benefits of the local environment. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography PEEG. 0820, Utrecht University, Section of Economic GeographyGoogle Scholar
  91. Neffke F, Henning M, Boschma R, Lundquist K-J, Olander L-O (2011) The dynamics of agglomeration externalities along the life cycle of industries. Reg Stud 45:49–65Google Scholar
  92. Nelson R, Phelps E (1966) Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth. Am Econ Revi 61:69–75Google Scholar
  93. Nooteboom B (2000) Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  94. Ohlin BG (1933) Interregional and international trade. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Revised edition published in 1967Google Scholar
  95. Otter HS, van der Veen A, de Vriend HJ (2001) ABLOoM: Location behaviour, spatial patterns, and agent-based modelling. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 4(4). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/4/2.html
  96. Parr JB (2002) Agglomeration economies: ambiguities and confusions. Environ Plan A 34:717–731Google Scholar
  97. Perry M (2010a) Controversies in local economic development: stories, strategies, solutions. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  98. Perry M (2010b) Controversies in local economic development. Local Econ 25(7):527–534Google Scholar
  99. Polanyi M (1967) The tacit dimension. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  100. Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  101. Porter M (1998) Clusters versus industrial policy. In: Porter M (ed) On competition. Harvard Business School Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  102. Porter M (2000) Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in the global economy. Econ Dev Q 14:15–31Google Scholar
  103. Potter A, Watts H (2011) Evolutionary agglomeration theory: increasing returns, diminishing returns, and the industry life cycle. J Econ Geogr 11(3):417–455Google Scholar
  104. Power D, Lundmark M (2004) Working through knowledge pools: labour market dynamics, the transference of knowledge and ideas, and industrial clusters. Urban Stud 41:1025–1044Google Scholar
  105. Richardson GB (1972) The organisation of industry. Econ J 82(327):883–896Google Scholar
  106. Rodriguez-Clare A (2007) Clusters and comparative advantage: implications for industrial policy. J Dev Econ 82(1):43–57Google Scholar
  107. Rodrik D (1996) Coordination failures and government policy: a model with applications to East Asia and Eastern Europe. J Int Econ 40(1–2):1–22Google Scholar
  108. Romer P (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94:1002–1037Google Scholar
  109. Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):S71–S102Google Scholar
  110. Ros J (2000) Development theory and the economics of growth. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  111. Rosenfeld S (2005) Industry clusters: business choice, policy outcome, or branding strategy? J New Bus Ideas Trends 3(2):4–13Google Scholar
  112. Rosenthal S, Strange W (2003) Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Rev Econ Stat 85(2):377–393Google Scholar
  113. Rosenthal S, Strange W (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of urban and regional economics, vol 4. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 2119–2171Google Scholar
  114. Ruan J, Zhang X (2009) Finance and cluster-based industrial development in China. Econ Dev Cult Change 58:143–164Google Scholar
  115. Saxenian A (1994) Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  116. Scherer F (1982) Demand-pull and technological innovation: schmookler revisited. J Ind Econ 30(3):225–238Google Scholar
  117. Schmitz H (1995) Collective efficiency: growth path for small-scale industry. J Dev Stud 31(4):529–566Google Scholar
  118. Scitovsky T (1954) Two concepts of external economies. J Polit Econ 62:70–82Google Scholar
  119. Scott AJ (2004) A perspective of economic geography. J Econ Geogr 4:479–499Google Scholar
  120. Simon HA (1997) An empirically based microeconomics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  121. Smith T (2000) Semiconductors. Standard & Poor’s Industry Surveys, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  122. Spencer G, Vinodrai T, Gertler M, Wolfe D (2009) Do clusters make a difference? Defining and assessing their economic performance. Reg Stud 34:1–19Google Scholar
  123. Stilwell F (1992) Understanding cities and regions: spatial political economy. Pluto Press, LeichardtGoogle Scholar
  124. Storper M (2009) The economics of context, location and trade: another great transformation? In: Becattini G, Bellandi M, De Propris L (eds) The handbook of industrial districts. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 141–157Google Scholar
  125. Tödtling F, Lehner P, Kaufmann A (2009) Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation 29:59–71Google Scholar
  126. Van der Linde C (2003) The demography of clusters—findings from the cluster meta-study. In: Bröcker J, Dohse D, Soltwedel R (eds) Innovation clusters and interregional competition. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 130–149Google Scholar
  127. Van der Panne G (2004) Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs. J Evol Econ 14:593–604Google Scholar
  128. Woodward D, Guimaraes P (2009) Porter’s cluster strategy and industrial targeting. In: Goetz SJ, Deller S, Harris T (eds) Targeting regional economic development. Routledge, New York, pp 68–83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEF.UP and NIFIP, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations