Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Okun’s law, asymmetries and regional spillovers: evidence from Virginia metropolitan statistical areas and the District of Columbia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to examine the strength of the relationship between unemployment and GDP, to determine the extent to which this relationship has been stable in Virginia metropolitan statistical areas (MSA) during the Great Recession and to examine the importance of regional spillovers in Okun’s law. Our results suggest that regional spillovers are very important in local labor markets and in defining the relationship observed at the national level. The MSA level data further supports asymmetries in Okun’s law. The weaker direct relationship between GDP and unemployment at the local level suggests that while federal fiscal and monetary policies to stimulate aggregate demand during periods of economic recovery may be effective, over time, in reducing the unemployment rate, local economic development policies are not effective in achieving the substantial short-term reduction in unemployment needed during recovery. The strong business cycle effects observed in the state MSA, relative to the U.S., suggests that countercyclical policies are fundamentally important and should be targeted more generally to exploit regional spillovers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dorddrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Rezitis A (2003) An examination of Okun’s law: evidence from regional areas in Greece. Appl Econ 35(10):1147–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball N, Koenig E (2009) Recent unemployment increases break the law. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas National Economic Update, June 29. http://dallasfed.org/research/update-us/2009/0904.cfm. Accessed 5 April 2012

  • Ball L, Leigh D, Loungani P (2013) Okun’s law: fit at fifty?, NBER Working Papers 18668, National Bureau of Economic Research Inc

  • Binet M, Facchini F (2013) Okun’s law in the french regions: a cross-regional comparison. Econ Bull 33(1):420–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackley P (1991) The measurement and determination of Okun’s law: evidence from state economies. J Macroecon 13(4):641–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O, Summers L (1987) Hysteresis in unemployment. Eur Econ Rev 31(1–2):288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlino G, Inman R (2013) Local deficits and local jobs: can U.S. states stabilize their own economies? NBER Working Paper No. 18930, National Bureau of Economic Research Inc

  • Christopoulos D (2004) The relationship between output and unemployment: evidence from Greek regions. Papers Reg Sci 83(3):611–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connaughton J, Madsen R (2009) Regional implications of the 2001 recession. Ann Reg Sci 43(2):491–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connaughton J, Madsen R (2012) U.S. State and regional economic impact of the 2008/2009 recession. J Reg Anal Policy 42(3): 177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuaresma J (2003) Okun’s law revisited. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 65(4):439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuestas J, Gil-Alana L (2011) Unemployment hysteresis, structural changes, non-linearities and fractional integration in European transition economies. Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series, University of Sheffield, UK

  • Debarsy N, Ertur C, LeSage J (2012) Interpreting dynamic space-time panel data models. Stat Methodol 9(1–2):158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman D (2001) Panel tests of Okun’s law for ten industrial countries. Econ Inq 39(4):511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes M, Silverstone B (2006) Okun’s law, asymmetries and jobless recoveries in the United States: a Markov-switching approach. Econ Lett 92(2):293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im K, Pesaran M, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115:53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangasharju A, Tavera C, Nijkamp P (2012) Regional growth and unemployment: the validity of Okun’s law for the Finnish regions. Spat Econ Anal 7(3):381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knotek E II (2007) How useful is Okun’s law? Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue Q IV, pp 73–103

  • Kuscevic C (2012) Okun’s law and urban spillovers. Banco Central de Bolivia, Encuentro de Economistas de Bolivia. http://www.bcb.gob.bo/eeb/sites/default/files/paralelas5eeb/viernes/Macroeconomia%20B/Casto%20Montero.pdf

  • LeSage J, Pace R (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton

  • Moosa I (1997) A cross-country comparison of Okun’s coefficient. J Comp Econ 24(3):335–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates W (1972) Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberst C, Oelgemöller J (2013) Economic Growth and Regional Labor Market Development in German Regions: Okun’s Law in a Spatial Context, FCN Working Papers 5/2013, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN)

  • Okun A (1962) Potential GNP: its measurement and significance. In: Proceedings of the business and economics statistics section of the American statistical association, pp 98–104

  • Owyang M, Sekhposyan T (2012) Okun’s law over the business cycle: was the great recession all that different? Fed Reserve Bank St. Louis Rev 94(5):399–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Owyang M, Piger J, Wall H (2013) Discordant city employment cycles. Reg Sci Urban Econ 43(2):367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira R (2013) Okun’s law across the business cycle and during the great recession: a Markov switching analysis. The College of William and Mary Working Paper Series

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57(6):1361–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perugini C (2009) Employment intensity of growth in Italy. A note using regional data. Reg Sect Econ Stud 9(1) 59–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvapulle P, Moosa I, Silvapulle M (2004) Asymmetry in Okun’s law. Can J Econ 37(2):353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirlwall A (1969) Okun’s law and the natural rate of growth. South Econ J 36:87–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villaverde J, Maza A (2009) The robustness of Okun’s law in Spain, 1980–2004: regional evidence. J Policy Model 31(2):289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber C (1995) Cyclical output, cyclical unemployment and Okun’s coefficient: a new approach. J Appl Econ 10:433–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazgan M, Yilmazkuday H (2009) Okun’s convergence within the US. Lett Spat Res Sci 2(2):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was developed with support from Virginia Employment Commission. I would also like to thank Tim Kestner, Peter McHenry, Sarah Stafford and the anonymous referees for their very valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui M. Pereira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pereira, R.M. Okun’s law, asymmetries and regional spillovers: evidence from Virginia metropolitan statistical areas and the District of Columbia. Ann Reg Sci 52, 583–595 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0600-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0600-x

JEL Classification

Navigation