Abstract
This paper uses an interpretive analysis to exam past and present developments in knowledge commercialization and provide researchers, policy makers, and university leaders an alternative framework. The model is based on historical precedent, and current economic realities, for effectively commercializing knowledge in the entrepreneurial age. While traditional technology transfer focused on an organizational centric approach, we propose an individual centric model of technology commercialization from universities. The move from an organization centric model to an individual centric model will likely follow past eras of change and innovation in higher education. The challenge for regional and university leadership is clear. Find methods and models for unleashing the knowledge across campus to solve local and regional challenges.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The nine colleges on the eve of the American Revolution were: Harvard (1636), William and Mary (1693), Yale (1701), Pennsylvania (1740), Princeton (1746), Columbia (1754), Brown (1764), Rutgers 1766), and Dartmouth (1769). See Rudolph (1990) for an extensive discussion of the founding and founders beyond each of these colleges. Universities, colleges, professional schools, and even departments have all become part of various ‘rankings games’ that try to ranks the best globally. Examples include US News and World Report, FT Business School, Times Higher Education World University Rankings, and QS Global Rankings.
The California Master Plan for Higher Education sets distinct roles for various campuses—including research, college, and community college http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/~ucalhist/archives_exhibits/masterplan/.
Other research focused universities funded by wealthy industrialists include Vanderbilt University, Tufts University, and Johns Hopkins University.
Bush’s report can be retrieved from the National Science Foundation’s website. http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm.
For more information on the Thiel Fellowships and the recipients visit the Thiel Foundation Website. http://www.thielfoundation.org/.
More information on University of Texas’ 1 Semester Startup can be found at http://www.1semesterstartup.com/ More information on Harvard Business School’s Minimum Viable Product Fun can be found at http://www.hbs.edu/entrepreneurship/resources/services.html.
Groupon Inc.’s S1 Filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission can be accessed via http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1490281/000104746911005613/a2203913zs-1.htm accessed June 24, 2011.
See New Venture Challenge Official Rules and Regulations: http://research.chicagobooth.edu/nvc/resources.aspx.
References
Allen P (2010) Idea man: a memoir by the cofounder of microsoft. Penguin Group USA, New York
Altbach P, Gumport P, Johnstone, D (2001) In defense of American higher education. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
Association of University Technology Managers (2010) Universities report startup creation, licensing activity and income strong despite recession, AUTM. 17 December 2010
Audretsch D (2007) The entrepreneurial society. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bercovitz J, Feldmann M (2006) Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. J Technol Transf 31:175–188
Bell D (1999) The coming of post-industrial society: a venture in social forecasting. Basic Books, New York
Bush V (1945) Science the endless frontier. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Cadenhead G (2002) No longer moot: the history of the moot corp competition. Renoir, USA
Cole J (2009) The great American university. Public Affairs, New York
Carlsson B, Acs Z, Audretsch D, Braunerhjelm P (2007) Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review. Ind Corporate Change 18(6):1193–1229
Crow M (2008) Building an Entrepreneurial University. In Kauffman foundation the future of the research university: meeting the global challenges of the 21st century. Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, MO, pp 11–30
Curti M, Carstensen V (1949) The university of Wisconsin: 1848–1925. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI
De Toqueville (2006) Democracy in America, vol 1. Project Gutenberg Ebook #815. http://www.projectgutenberg.org. Accessed June 2011
Drucker P (1993) Innovation and entrepreneurship. HarperBusiness, New York, NY
Economist (1976) The coming entrepreneurial revolution a survey. Economist Magazine 25 December: 41–65
Economist (2005) The brains business: a survey of higher education. Economist Magazine 10 September
Etzkowitz H (2008) The triple helix. Routledge, New York
Farrell M (2010) Creating competition among business plan competitions. Forbes.com. http://blogs.forbes.com/maureenfarrell/2010/08/16/creating-competition-among-business-plan-competitions/ Accessed 16 August 2010
Flexner A (1994) Universities: American, English, German. Oxford University Press, New York
Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. Basic Books, New York
Florida R, Gates G, Knudsen B, Stolarick K (2006) The university and the creative economy. CreativeClass.com http://www.creativeclass.org. Retrieved 2008
Gartner W, Vesper K (1994) Experiments in entrepreneurship education: successes and failures. J Bus Ventur 9:179–187
Kamenetz A (2010) DIY u: edupunks, edupreneurs, and the coming transformation of higher education. Chelsea Green Publishing Company, White River Junction VT
Katz J (2008) Fully Mature but not fully legitimate: a different perspective on the state of entrepreneurship education. J Small Bus Man 46(4):550–566
Kerr C (2001) The uses of the university. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Lehman-Haupt R (2000) Dorm room economy. Business 2.0 November, pp 204–212
Link A, Scott J (2003) The growth of research triangle park. Small Bus Econ 20:167–175
Litan R, Mitchell L (2010) A faster path from lab to market. Harv Bus Rev 88(1/2):52–53
MacMillian D (2011) Thiel awards 24 under 20 fellowships. Businessweek http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2011/tc20110524_317819.htm Accessed 30 June 2011
Markham G, Phan P, Balkin D, Gianiodis P (2005) Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. J Bus Ventur 20(2):241–263
Mardsen G (1994) The soul of the American university. Oxford University Press, New York
O’Shea R, Allen T, Morse K, O’Gorman C, Roche F (2007) Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts institute of technology experience. R& D Manag 37(1):1–16
Rudolph F (1990) The American college and university: a history. University of Georgia Press, Athens
Saxenian A (1996) Regional advantage: culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Harvard University Press, Boston
Steiner C (2010) Meet the fastest growing company ever. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0830/entrepreneurs-groupon-facebook-twitter-next-web-phenom.html Accessed June 2011
Thelin J (2004) A history of American higher education. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Thorp H, Goldstein B (2010) Engines of innovation: the entrepreneurial university in the twenty-first century. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill
Titus E (2010) Supreme court case is about principle, not revenue, says Etchemendy. Stanford daily 5 nov. http://www.stanforddaily.com/2010/11/05/supreme-court-case-isabout-principle-not-revenue-says-etchemendy/. Accessed 29 June 2011
Tsotsis A (2011) Y combinator brings on alumni to be ‘part time partners’. TechCrunch http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/13/ycombinator-brings-on-alumni-to-be-part-time-partners/ Accessed 1 July 2011
Turner F (2008) The frontier in American history. Bibliobazzar, Charleston
Veysey L (1965) The emergence of the American University. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, D.J., Acs, Z.J. Technology commercialization on campus: twentieth century frameworks and twenty-first century blind spots. Ann Reg Sci 50, 407–423 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0511-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0511-7