Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technology commercialization on campus: twentieth century frameworks and twenty-first century blind spots

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses an interpretive analysis to exam past and present developments in knowledge commercialization and provide researchers, policy makers, and university leaders an alternative framework. The model is based on historical precedent, and current economic realities, for effectively commercializing knowledge in the entrepreneurial age. While traditional technology transfer focused on an organizational centric approach, we propose an individual centric model of technology commercialization from universities. The move from an organization centric model to an individual centric model will likely follow past eras of change and innovation in higher education. The challenge for regional and university leadership is clear. Find methods and models for unleashing the knowledge across campus to solve local and regional challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The nine colleges on the eve of the American Revolution were: Harvard (1636), William and Mary (1693), Yale (1701), Pennsylvania (1740), Princeton (1746), Columbia (1754), Brown (1764), Rutgers 1766), and Dartmouth (1769). See Rudolph (1990) for an extensive discussion of the founding and founders beyond each of these colleges. Universities, colleges, professional schools, and even departments have all become part of various ‘rankings games’ that try to ranks the best globally. Examples include US News and World Report, FT Business School, Times Higher Education World University Rankings, and QS Global Rankings.

  2. The California Master Plan for Higher Education sets distinct roles for various campuses—including research, college, and community college http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/~ucalhist/archives_exhibits/masterplan/.

  3. Other research focused universities funded by wealthy industrialists include Vanderbilt University, Tufts University, and Johns Hopkins University.

  4. Bush’s report can be retrieved from the National Science Foundation’s website. http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm.

  5. For more information on the Thiel Fellowships and the recipients visit the Thiel Foundation Website. http://www.thielfoundation.org/.

  6. More information on University of Texas’ 1 Semester Startup can be found at http://www.1semesterstartup.com/ More information on Harvard Business School’s Minimum Viable Product Fun can be found at http://www.hbs.edu/entrepreneurship/resources/services.html.

  7. Groupon Inc.’s S1 Filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission can be accessed via http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1490281/000104746911005613/a2203913zs-1.htm accessed June 24, 2011.

  8. See New Venture Challenge Official Rules and Regulations: http://research.chicagobooth.edu/nvc/resources.aspx.

References

  • Allen P (2010) Idea man: a memoir by the cofounder of microsoft. Penguin Group USA, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach P, Gumport P, Johnstone, D (2001) In defense of American higher education. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

  • Association of University Technology Managers (2010) Universities report startup creation, licensing activity and income strong despite recession, AUTM. 17 December 2010

  • Audretsch D (2007) The entrepreneurial society. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz J, Feldmann M (2006) Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. J Technol Transf 31:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell D (1999) The coming of post-industrial society: a venture in social forecasting. Basic Books, New York

  • Bush V (1945) Science the endless frontier. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • Cadenhead G (2002) No longer moot: the history of the moot corp competition. Renoir, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole J (2009) The great American university. Public Affairs, New York

  • Carlsson B, Acs Z, Audretsch D, Braunerhjelm P (2007) Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review. Ind Corporate Change 18(6):1193–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow M (2008) Building an Entrepreneurial University. In Kauffman foundation the future of the research university: meeting the global challenges of the 21st century. Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, MO, pp 11–30

  • Curti M, Carstensen V (1949) The university of Wisconsin: 1848–1925. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • De Toqueville (2006) Democracy in America, vol 1. Project Gutenberg Ebook #815. http://www.projectgutenberg.org. Accessed June 2011

  • Drucker P (1993) Innovation and entrepreneurship. HarperBusiness, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (1976) The coming entrepreneurial revolution a survey. Economist Magazine 25 December: 41–65

  • Economist (2005) The brains business: a survey of higher education. Economist Magazine 10 September

  • Etzkowitz H (2008) The triple helix. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell M (2010) Creating competition among business plan competitions. Forbes.com. http://blogs.forbes.com/maureenfarrell/2010/08/16/creating-competition-among-business-plan-competitions/ Accessed 16 August 2010

  • Flexner A (1994) Universities: American, English, German. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R, Gates G, Knudsen B, Stolarick K (2006) The university and the creative economy. CreativeClass.com http://www.creativeclass.org. Retrieved 2008

  • Gartner W, Vesper K (1994) Experiments in entrepreneurship education: successes and failures. J Bus Ventur 9:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamenetz A (2010) DIY u: edupunks, edupreneurs, and the coming transformation of higher education. Chelsea Green Publishing Company, White River Junction VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz J (2008) Fully Mature but not fully legitimate: a different perspective on the state of entrepreneurship education. J Small Bus Man 46(4):550–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr C (2001) The uses of the university. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Lehman-Haupt R (2000) Dorm room economy. Business 2.0 November, pp 204–212

  • Link A, Scott J (2003) The growth of research triangle park. Small Bus Econ 20:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litan R, Mitchell L (2010) A faster path from lab to market. Harv Bus Rev 88(1/2):52–53

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillian D (2011) Thiel awards 24 under 20 fellowships. Businessweek http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2011/tc20110524_317819.htm Accessed 30 June 2011

  • Markham G, Phan P, Balkin D, Gianiodis P (2005) Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. J Bus Ventur 20(2):241–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardsen G (1994) The soul of the American university. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea R, Allen T, Morse K, O’Gorman C, Roche F (2007) Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts institute of technology experience. R& D Manag 37(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph F (1990) The American college and university: a history. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A (1996) Regional advantage: culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C (2010) Meet the fastest growing company ever. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0830/entrepreneurs-groupon-facebook-twitter-next-web-phenom.html Accessed June 2011

  • Thelin J (2004) A history of American higher education. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp H, Goldstein B (2010) Engines of innovation: the entrepreneurial university in the twenty-first century. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus E (2010) Supreme court case is about principle, not revenue, says Etchemendy. Stanford daily 5 nov. http://www.stanforddaily.com/2010/11/05/supreme-court-case-isabout-principle-not-revenue-says-etchemendy/. Accessed 29 June 2011

  • Tsotsis A (2011) Y combinator brings on alumni to be ‘part time partners’. TechCrunch http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/13/ycombinator-brings-on-alumni-to-be-part-time-partners/ Accessed 1 July 2011

  • Turner F (2008) The frontier in American history. Bibliobazzar, Charleston

  • Veysey L (1965) The emergence of the American University. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, D.J., Acs, Z.J. Technology commercialization on campus: twentieth century frameworks and twenty-first century blind spots. Ann Reg Sci 50, 407–423 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0511-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0511-7

JEL Classification

Navigation