The Annals of Regional Science

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 595–618 | Cite as

New housing supply elasticity in Australia: a comparison of dwelling types

Special Issue Paper

Abstract

This paper extends the work of McLaughlin (Australas J Reg Stud 1(17):60–80, 2011) by estimating housing supply elasticities of the six Australian capital cities over a longer panel, from 1983–2010. In addition, we extend McLaughlin’s analysis by comparing housing supply elasticities by dwelling type and also test for the presence of longer supply lags than previously examined in the supply literature. Based on widespread implementation of land-use regulations by Australian federal and state governments over the past 30 years, we hypothesize difference in elasticity between housing types is ambiguous, with supply lags greater for multifamily units. We employ the urban growth model of new housing supply developed by Mayer and Somerville (J Urb Econ 48(1):85–109, 2000a) and Mayer and Somerville (Reg Sci Urb Econ 30(6):639–662, 2000b) and employed in Zabel and Paterson (J Reg Sci 46(1):67–95, 2006) and McLaughlin (Australas J Reg Stud 1(17):60–80, 2011), to estimate the elasticity of new housing supply in Australia’s six capital cities—Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, and Hobart—using an unbalanced quarterly panel from 1983–2010. Our findings suggest that the elasticity of new supply is greater for multifamily units than single-family units, while supply response lags for multifamily homes are on the order of 4–8 quarters longer than that of single-family homes. These findings suggest that although Australian land-use policies may be achieving their goal of increasing the supply of smaller, more affordable units, future policies should seek to reduce the extensive supply lags of housing types to help ease short-run price increases.

JEL Classification

R31 R38 R52 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball M (2003) Markets and the structure of the housebuilding industry. Urb Stud 40(5–6): 897–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Ilan A, Strange W (1996) Urban development with lags. J Urb Econ 39(1): 87–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bar-Ilan A, Strange W (1998) A model of sequential investment. J Econ Dyn Control 22(3): 437–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunker R (2008) A plenitude, plethora or plague of plans? State strategic Plans, metropolitan strategies and infrastructure plans. Built Environ 34(3): 319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron A, Trivedi P (2009) Microeconometrics using Stata. Stata Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  6. Capozza DR, Helsley RW (1989) The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth. J Urban Econ 26(3): 95–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coiacetto E (2009) Industry structure in real estate development: is city building competitive. Urban Policy Res 27(2): 117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demographia (2011) International housing affordability survey, 7th edn. http://www.demographia.com accessed 20 July 2011
  9. DiPasquale D, Wheaton WC (1994) Housing market dynamics and the future of housing prices. J Urban Econ 35(1): 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dowling R (2005) Residential building in Australia: 1993–2003. Urb Policy Res 23(4): 447–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Economist (2010) The global house prices: froth and stagnation, 8 July. http://www.economist.com/node/16542826 accessed 20 July 2011
  12. Fischel W (2001) The Homevoter hypothesis. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Gan Q, Hill RJ (2009) Measuring housing affordability: looking beyond the median. J Housing Econ 18(2): 115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gleeson B, Coiacetto E (2007) Positive planning in Australia: a review of historical and emergent rationales. Urb Policy Res 25(1): 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grenadier S (1995) The persistence of real estate cycles. J Real Estate Finance Econ 10(2): 95–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gyourko K, Saiz A, Summers A (2008) A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: the Wharton residential land use regulatory index. Urb Stud 45(3): 693–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamnett S, Kellett J (2007) Onward, outward, upward? A review of contemporary australian metropolitan growth policies. Third State of Australian Cities Conference, Adelaide, February 18–20Google Scholar
  18. Hanak E (2008) Is water policy limiting residential growth? Evidence from California. Land Econ 84(1): 31–50Google Scholar
  19. Ihlanfeldt K, Burge G (2006) The effects of impact fees on multifamily housing construction. J Reg Sci 46(1): 5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang H, Song Y, Liu C (2011) House price bubble estimations in Australia’s capital cities with market fundamentals. Pac Rim Prop Res J 17(1): 132–156Google Scholar
  21. Kellett J (2011) The Australian quarter acre block: the death of a dream. Town Plan Rev 82(3): 263–284Google Scholar
  22. Lea M (2010) Alternative forms of mortgage finance: what can we learn from other countries? Paper prepared for Harvard Joint Center for Housing studies national symposium moving forward: the future of consumer credit and mortgage finance. Harvard Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  23. Mayer C, Somerville T (2000a) Residential construction: using the urban growth model to estimate housing supply. J Urb Econ 48(1): 85–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mayer C, Somerville T (2000b) Land use regulation and new construction. Reg Sci Urb Econ 30(6): 639–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McLaughlin R (2011) Metropolitan growth policies and new housing supply: evidence from Australia’s capital cities. Australas J Reg Stud 1(17): 60–80Google Scholar
  26. National Housing Supply Council (2010) State of supply report 2010. Australian Government. Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  27. Nelson A, Pendall R, Dawkins C, Knaap G (2004) The link between growth management and housing affordability: the academic evidence. In: Downs A (eds) Growth management and affordable housing: do they conflict?. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, pp 82–101Google Scholar
  28. Real estate institute of Australia (2010) Australian house prices: bursting the bubble myth. http://www.reia.com.au/userfiles/REIAPublications_HousingBubblePaper.pdf Accessed 22 July 2011
  29. Richards A (2009) Housing market developments. Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin, pp 20–26. http://www.rba.gov. Accessed 10 Aug 2011
  30. Saiz A (2010) The geographic determinants of housing supply. Q J Econ. 125(3): 1253–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stapledon N (2010) A history of housing prices in Australia 1880–2010. UNSW Australian School of Business Research Paper No. 2010 ECON 18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1711224
  32. Troy P (1978) A fair price: the land commission program 1972–77. Hale and Iremonger, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  33. Voith R, Crawford D (2004) Smart growth and affordable housing. In: Downs A (eds) Growth management and affordable housing: do they conflict?. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, pp 82–101Google Scholar
  34. Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Yates J (2001) The rhetoric and reality of housing choice: the role of urban consolidation. Urb Policy Res 19(4): 491–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zabel JE, Paterson RW (2006) The effects of critical habitat designation on housing supply: an analysis of California housing construction activity. J Reg Sci 46(1): 67–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Natural and Built EnvironmentsUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations